Cardiovascular Aging Research Laboratory
Austin, Texas, 78705, United States
NCT Number: NCT05451641
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of blood flow restriction (BFR) resistance training on vascular function. The investigators aim to compare the effects of different BFR devices (wide-rigid cuffs and narrow elastic bands) on vascular function. The investigators hypothesize that BFR resistance training with wide-rigid cuffs might have a minor negative effect (short-term and reversible) on vascular function, while BFR resistance training with narrow-elastic bands may improve vascular function. Both training methods are equally effective in increasing muscle strength.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–40 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Austin, Texas, 78705, United States
Blood flow restriction (BFR) resistance training has been proven to be effective in increasing muscle mass and strength. During BFR training, cuffs (similar to blood pressure cuffs) are placed on the proximal ends of the extremities to partially occlude arterial blood flow to the working muscles and fully restrict venous outflow from the working muscle. The metabolites produced by the working muscle during exercise are trapped in the working muscle, which causes metabolic stress to augment muscle adaptation. Typically, two types of cuffs are used in the BFR training: the narrow-elastic bands and wide-rigid nylon cuffs adapted from surgical tourniquets and blood pressure cuffs.
Currently, the effect of BFR training on vascular function remains unclear. When the cuffs are removed after BFR training, there will be a reactive hyperemic blood flow to wash out all the metabolites produced during exercise. This reactive hyperemic blood flow also will impose shear stress on the arterial vessel wall. The shear stress will lead to an increase in vasodilator factors, which lead to an improvement in vascular function. However, other studies have pointed out that BFR training might cause a negative effect on vascular function when the occlusion pressure was too high. The possible mechanisms of the negative effect might be ischemia-reperfusion injury and retrograde shear stress in the artery. The wide-rigid cuffs are easily available but have the potential to inhibit the expansion of muscle upon increased blood flow accompanying exercise and muscle contraction while the narrow-elastic bands do not prevent the expansion. To the investigators' best knowledge, there is no study directly comparing different BFR cuffs on vascular function. Thus, the aim of the present study is to compare the effects of different BFR cuffs on vascular function (evaluated by flow-mediated dilation, a non-invasive measure of endothelial-derived vasodilation).
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The participants will receive a 2-week exercise training program (3 times per week). Each training session will consist of 3 resistance training exercises with two blood flow restriction devices (wide-rigid cuff and narrow-elastic band). For both arms, the participants will perform the same exercise with different BFR devices.
Time frame: Baseline measurement and measurement at 2 weeks
Flow-mediated dilation evaluated by an ultrasound machine
Time frame: Baseline measurement and measurement at 2 weeks
Measured by a cable machine in the gym
Time frame: Baseline measurement and measurement at 2 weeks
Measured by a hand dynamometer
Time frame: Baseline measurement and measurement at 2 weeks
Measured by a bioelectrical impedance analysis machine
Time frame: Baseline measurement and measurement at 2 weeks
Measured by a bioelectrical impedance analysis machine
Time frame: Baseline measurement and measurement at 2 weeks
Measured by a bioelectrical impedance analysis machine
Time frame: Baseline measurement
Measured by an ultrasound machine
Time frame: At 2 weeks
Measured by an ultrasound machine
Time frame: Baseline measurement and measurement at 2 weeks
Evaluated by the Omron VP-1000plus device (Non-invasive measurement)
Time frame: At 10 minutes before the training sessions (baseline measurement) and at 10 minutes after the training sessions
Measured by a lactometer
Time frame: At 10 minutes before the training sessions (baseline measurement), at 10 minutes, 20 minutes, and 30 minutes during the training sessions
Measured by a heart rate monitor
Time frame: At 10 minutes before the training sessions (baseline measurement), at 10 minutes, 20 minutes, and 30 minutes during the training sessions
Measured by an Omron digital blood pressure monitor
Time frame: At 10 minutes, 20 minutes, and 30 minutes during the training sessions
Borg rating of perceived exertion scale
Hirofumi Tanaka
Other
The Effect of Blood Flow Restriction Resistance Training on Vascular Function: Wide-Rigid Cuffs vs. Narrow-Elastic Bands
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06288828
Aerobic Exercises, Atrophy
Bangkok, Thailand
View Trial DetailsNCT07544186
COVID-19, Chronic Disease
Mexico City, Mexico
View Trial DetailsNCT04971408
Central Nervous System Diseases, Chronic Inflammation
San Antonio, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05726474
Arterial Stiffness, Behavior
Cuenca, Spain
View Trial Details