Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07453277

Blood-Based Molecular Clock Biomarkers Predict Acute Ischemic Stroke Onset: A Prospective Observational Study

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a major cause of mortality and long-term neurological disability worldwide. The effectiveness of reperfusion therapies such as intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy is highly dependent on the time elapsed since symptom onset. However, in approximately 15-25% of patients, the exact onset time cannot be determined because symptoms begin during sleep (wake-up stroke) or the onset is otherwise unclear. This uncertainty often prevents patients from receiving time-dependent reperfusion treatments.

Currently, imaging-based approaches such as diffusion-weighted imaging-fluid attenuated inversion recovery (DWI-FLAIR) mismatch are used to estimate the biological stage of ischemia in patients with unknown onset time. However, advanced imaging techniques may not be available in all centers and interpretation may vary.

This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a multi-biomarker panel representing different biological components of ischemic brain injury, including glial, neuronal, axonal, cellular stress, and vascular responses. Blood samples obtained at admission will be analyzed for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1), serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL), phosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein 1 (PEBP1), and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9).

The primary objective is to determine whether this biomarker panel can distinguish patients presenting within ≤4.5 hours from those presenting after >4.5 hours of symptom onset. Biomarker findings will be compared with imaging-based reference methods to explore the feasibility of a blood-based "molecular clock" approach for estimating stroke timing in patients with uncertain onset.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Izmir Katip Çelebi University Ataturk Research and Training Hospital

Izmir, 35220, Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is one of the leading causes of mortality and long-term neurological disability worldwide. The effectiveness of reperfusion therapies, including intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy, is highly dependent on the time elapsed since symptom onset. Determination of the symptom onset time is therefore a critical component of treatment eligibility. However, a substantial proportion of patients present with stroke symptoms of unknown onset, most commonly because the symptoms develop during sleep (wake-up stroke) or because the exact onset time cannot be reliably established. This uncertainty may prevent eligible patients from receiving time-dependent reperfusion therapies.

Current clinical decision-making in patients with uncertain onset time relies largely on imaging-based approaches that attempt to estimate the biological stage of ischemia. The diffusion-weighted imaging-fluid attenuated inversion recovery (DWI-FLAIR) mismatch concept is the most widely used method and is based on the hypothesis that tissue signal evolution reflects the duration of ischemia. Advanced perfusion imaging techniques have also been incorporated into clinical practice. However, these imaging methods require specialized equipment and expertise, may not be available in all centers, and their interpretation may vary between institutions. Consequently, there is increasing interest in identifying circulating biomarkers that can reflect the biological timing of ischemic injury.

Ischemic brain injury initiates a complex cascade of pathophysiological processes involving astroglial activation, neuronal membrane disruption, axonal injury, inflammatory signaling, cellular stress responses, and vascular dysfunction. These processes evolve dynamically over time and lead to the release of measurable molecular components into the systemic circulation. Biomarkers reflecting different cellular compartments of the neurovascular unit may therefore provide complementary information regarding the temporal evolution of ischemic injury.

Several candidate biomarkers have been identified that represent different biological aspects of this process. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is an astrocyte-specific structural protein that reflects astroglial injury and early glial activation following acute brain damage. Ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) is a neuron-specific cytoplasmic enzyme released after neuronal membrane disruption and has been proposed as an indicator of acute neuronal injury. Serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) is a structural component of the axonal cytoskeleton and is considered a marker of axonal degeneration and structural neuronal damage. Phosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein 1 (PEBP1), also known as Raf kinase inhibitory protein, is involved in the regulation of cellular signaling pathways and stress responses and may reflect cellular adaptation to ischemic stress. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) is associated with inflammatory activation, extracellular matrix degradation, and blood-brain barrier dysfunction during the evolution of ischemic brain injury.

The combined evaluation of biomarkers representing multiple biological layers of the neurovascular unit may provide a more comprehensive representation of the temporal dynamics of ischemic injury than single-marker approaches. A multi-biomarker strategy has the potential to capture different phases of the ischemic cascade, including glial activation, neuronal damage, axonal injury, cellular stress response, and vascular dysfunction.

The present study aims to investigate whether a multi-compartment biomarker panel can contribute to the estimation of the biological timing of acute ischemic stroke. By evaluating circulating biomarkers representing different components of the neurovascular unit, the study seeks to explore the feasibility of a blood-based molecular signature that reflects the temporal evolution of ischemic injury.

The findings of this study may contribute to the development of a biologically informed approach for estimating stroke timing and may support clinical decision-making in patients presenting with uncertain symptom onset, particularly in settings where advanced imaging techniques are not readily available.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Be 18 years of age or older
  • Presence of acute focal neurological deficit
  • Presentation within ≤24 hours of the last time the patient was well

Exclusion criteria

  • Intracranial hemorrhage
  • Active infection or sepsis
  • Major surgery/trauma within the last 14 days
  • Active autoimmune disease
  • Stroke within the last 3 months
  • Immunosuppressive therapy

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic performance of the multi-biomarker panel in identifying the biological time window of acute ischemic stroke (≤4.5 hours vs >4.5 hours from symptom onset)

    Time frame: At emergency department admission.

    The primary outcome will be the ability of the combined biomarker panel (GFAP, UCH-L1, sNfL, PEBP1, and MMP-9) measured from admission blood samples to discriminate patients presenting within ≤4.5 hours versus >4.5 hours after symptom onset. Diagnostic performance will be evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and reported as area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and optimal cut-off values.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic performance of individual biomarkers

    Time frame: At emergency department admission.

    The diagnostic accuracy of each biomarker (GFAP, UCH-L1, sNfL, PEBP1, and MMP-9) will be evaluated individually for distinguishing ≤4.5 hours versus >4.5 hours from symptom onset using ROC curve analysis.

  2. Association between biomarker levels and imaging-based reference methods

    Time frame: Baseline imaging obtained at hospital admission.

    Circulating biomarker levels will be compared with imaging findings used to estimate stroke timing (e.g., DWI-FLAIR mismatch or other clinically available imaging parameters) to assess concordance between molecular and imaging-based indicators of ischemic timing.

  3. Incremental diagnostic value of the combined biomarker model

    Time frame: At emergency department admission.

    We will assess multivariable models that include the biomarker panel to see if analyzing the biomarkers together offers better diagnostic accuracy than looking at each biomarker separately.

  4. Correlation between circulating biomarker levels and infarct volume on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)

    Time frame: Baseline imaging obtained within the initial diagnostic evaluation after hospital admission.

    The relationship between admission biomarker concentrations (GFAP, UCH-L1, sNfL, PEBP1, and MMP-9) and infarct volume measured on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) will be evaluated to explore the association between molecular markers of ischemic injury and the extent of cerebral infarction. Correlation analyses will be performed to determine whether biomarker levels reflect infarct burden.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Izmir Katip Celebi University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

The Role of Blood-Based Molecular Clock Biomarkers in Predicting the Onset Time of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Prospective Observational Study

Acronym: wakeupstroke

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Mar 5, 2026
Registry last updated
Mar 6, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.