University of California, San Diego
San Diego, California, 92093, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Rana McKay, MD
CONTACT
Tyler Seibert, MD, PhD
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT06651697
The present study evaluates empty and full bladder protocols for radiation therapy of genitourinary (GU), gynecological (Gyn), and gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies of the pelvis.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
San Diego, California, 92093, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Rana McKay, MD
CONTACT
Tyler Seibert, MD, PhD
CONTACT
Pelvic radiation therapy plays a key role in the treatment of common genitourinary (GU), gynecological (Gyn), and gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies of the pelvis. Prior to starting a course of radiation therapy, patients undergo a CT simulation that allows for computer-based optimization of radiation dose delivery to target while simultaneously minimizing dose to surrounding normal tissues, such as the bladder and rectum. Commonly, physicians instruct patients undergoing pelvic radiation therapy to present with a reproducibly full bladder for the simulation and for each subsequent treatment session with the hope that increased distance between normal tissues (anterior bladder wall and bowel) and treatment target will limit toxicity. However, treating with a full bladder can result in wide variations in bladder volume. Often patients are unable to reproduce the bladder distention achieved at simulation, especially as typical urinary symptoms related to radiation develop during treatment. As the initial CT simulation is used to calculate dose distribution, bladder volume changes can affect radiation dose distribution to the bladder itself as well as adjacent pelvic organs. Given the challenges and uncertainties of treating with a full bladder, there has been increasing interest in bladder empty protocols. Retrospective, non-randomized, single-institution studies demonstrate that bladder empty protocols reduced absolute variation in bladder volume during treatment, had minimal impact on treatment related toxicity, and had non-inferior biochemical progression free survival, GI toxicities, and GU toxicities. However, prospective data is very limited. The present study plans to fill this knowledge gap by randomizing study participants to empty and full bladder protocols for simulation and radiation therapy.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Radiation therapy with full bladder or empty bladder protocols
Time frame: 3 months post radiation
Acute any attribution GU and/or GI grade ≥2 toxicity. This will be defined as the percentage of patients with CTCAE version 5.0 GU and/or GI grade ≥2 toxicity within 3 months post radiation therapy. This will be defined as a co-primary endpoint.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Rana McKay, MD
CONTACT
Tyler Seibert, MD, PhD
CONTACT
University of California, San Diego
Other
Acronym: BEFORE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05605353
Neoplasms, Neoplasms by Site
Aberdeen, Scotland, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT07622888
Abdominal Neoplasm, Abdominal Neoplasms
Saint Petersburg, Russia
View Trial DetailsNCT03458598
Anesthesia, Local, Bladder Neoplasm
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT07216456
Anorectal Cancer, Female Urogenital Diseases
Durham, North Carolina, United States
View Trial Details