Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05959252

BivaLirudin versUS Heparin in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

The goal of this open label randomised clinical trial is to compare Bivalirudin versus Heparin for anticoagulation in patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support.

The main question it aims to answer are include the ability to maintain anticoagulation within defined therapeutic range, bleeding and thrombotic complications and a comparison of the total cost of anticoagulation care.

Participants will be randomised to either anticoagulation with Bivalirudin or anticoagulation with Unfractionated Heparin.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Royal Prince Alfred Hospital

Sydney, New South Wales, 2050, Australia

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Anthony Keech

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Brian Plunkett

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Bruce Cartwright

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Elliot Worku

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Ian Marschner

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Lianne Khoo

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Lucy Wells

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Mark Dennis

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Mark Dennis, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+61295156111

Paul Forrest

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Richard Totaro

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Ru Carey

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Timothy J Southwood

CONTACT

[email protected]

+61295156111

Timothy J Southwood

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

About this study

Rationale:

Anticoagulation whilst on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is required. Bleeding and thrombotic complications whilst on ECMO are common and may effect the patient outcome. The optimal anticoagulant for ECMO patients is not clear and there exists no randomised control trial data comparing anticoagulants on ECMO. This Phase 2b trial will provide data to enable larger definitive phase III trials to determine the best anticoagulant whilst on ECMO.

Hypothesis: Hypothesis: In adults ECMO patients'; anticoagulation with Bivalirudin results in more samples within therapeutic range than unfractionated Heparin. Total anticoagulation costs with Bivalirudin are similar to unfractionated Heparin.

The objectives of this study is to assess anticoagulation protocol of bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin and assess the to the cost of each protocol.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients receiving ECMO
  • Age: 18 years or older
  • Ability to randomise the patient within 4 hours of ECMO support initiation

Exclusion criteria

  • Post-cardiotomy ECMO patients
  • Contraindication to heparin or bivalirudin at time of randomisation e.g., active bleeding
  • Heparin induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia syndrome
  • Where the patient is expected to be disconnected from ECMO in the next day after cannulation.
  • Limitations of care put in place either through patient wishes or the treating medical teams
  • Other reason where the treating physician deems the study is not in the patient's best interest
  • Patients who are suspected or confirmed to be pregnant
  • Inherited bleeding or thrombotic disorders, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus patients

Treatment and study plan

Unfractionated heparin

Drug

Unfractionated Heparin protocol with target anti-Xa of 0.3-0.5 IU/mL

Other names: Heparin

Bivalirudin

Drug

Bivalirudin protocol with target aPTT 50-70 seconds

Primary outcomes

  1. Time in therapeutic range

    Time frame: 30 days

    Proportion of monitoring samples within therapeutic range

Secondary outcomes

  1. Enrolment rate

    Time frame: 30 days

    Enrolment rate

  2. Reasons for non-enrolment

    Time frame: 30 days

    Reasons for non-enrolment of eligible patients into the study

  3. Crossover between arms

    Time frame: 30 days

    The number of cross over patients between arms of the study

  4. Circuit changes

    Time frame: 30 days

    The number of circuit changes and length of circuit life

  5. Daily mean aPTT and anti-Xa

    Time frame: 30 days

    Daily mean aPTT and anti-Xa versus stated range

  6. Serious adverse events (SAEs)

    Time frame: 30 days

    Number of SAEs

  7. Protocol violations

    Time frame: 30 days

    Number of protocol violations

  8. Thrombotic events

    Time frame: 30 days

    Number of deep vein thrombosis identified by ultrasound or CT

  9. Major bleeding events defined by International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH)

    Time frame: 30 days

    Major bleeding was defined according to the criteria as clinically overt bleeding which was fatal or associated with any of the following: (a) a fall in hemoglobin level of 2 g/dL or more or documented transfusion of at least 2 units of packed red blood cells, (b) involvement of a critical anatomical site (intracranial, spinal, ocular, pericardial, articular, intramuscular with compartment syndrome, retroperitoneal)

  10. Bleeding events defined by Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC)

    Time frame: 30 days

    Number of bleeding events as per BARC

    Hemorrhagic complications assessed and adapted as per Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) Type 0: No bleeding Type 1: Bleeding requiring transfusion of packed red blood cells (PRBC) or reduction of unfractionated heparin Type 2: Bleeding requiring transfusion of PRBC and reduction of unfractionated heparin Type 3: Life-threatening bleeding requiring, transfusion of PRBC, surgical intervention or discontinuation of ECMO Type 4: Any fatal bleeding

  11. Survival to Intensive care Unit (ICU) discharge

    Time frame: 30 days

    Survival to discharge from ICU (percentage of patients surviving to ICU discharge)

  12. Survival to hospital discharge

    Time frame: 30 days

    Hospital Survival (percentage of patients surviving hospital discharge)

  13. Blood product usage

    Time frame: 30 days

    Total amount of red blood cells (RBC), platelets, plasma and blood products used during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support

  14. Cost

    Time frame: 30 days

    Total cost of of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support that includes blood products, blood tests and complications (measured in United States dollars)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Sydney Local Health District

Other Gov

Registry information

Official study title

BivaLirudin versUS Heparin in ECMO - A Registry-embedded, Randomised, Open Label, Feasibility Trial Comparing Two Anticoagulation Strategies in Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO)

Acronym: BLUSH

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jul 25, 2023
Registry last updated
May 8, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.