NCT Number: NCT03634358
Bipolar Scissors for Circumcision
comparing the outcomes of using bipolar scissors for male circumcision to the classic scalpel method
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
40 day–18 month
Sex eligibility
Male
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Not applicable
About this study
A prospective, randomized study, comparing two different techniques for pediatric male circumcision: the bipolar diathermy scissors technique with that of a classic scalpel technique. Study included male infants from 40 days old up to 18 month old. They were reviewed regarding Operative time, bleeding, complications, postoperative pain and morbidity. Differences in the outcome were compared.
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- Male infant between 40 days and 18 month old
- parents' request and approval of circumcision
Exclusion criteria
- previous attempts of circumcision or revision cases
- bleeding tendency
- congenital anomalies involving genitalia
- age below 40 days (expected Vit. K deficiency) or above 18 month old.
Treatment and study plan
classic scalpel
ProcedurePrimary outcomes
-
Post-operative bleeding
Time frame: A week
occurrence of active bleeding after circumcision
Secondary outcomes
-
Post-operative pain
Time frame: A week
pain after operation as assessed and described by parents (through a questionnaire) by the Neonatal/Infant Pain Scale (NIPS): It is composed of six (6) indicators.
- facial expression
- cry
- breathing patterns
- arms
- legs
- state of arousal Each behavioral indicator is scored with 0 or 1 except "cry", which has three possible descriptors therefore, being scored with a 0, 1 or 2. Infants should be observed for one minute in order to fully assess each indicator. Total pain scores range from 0-7. Pain Level is determined as: 0-2 = mild to no pain. 3-4 = mild to moderate pain >4 = severe pain
-
wound complications
Time frame: Two weeks
occurrence of infection, necrosis or skin loss around wound
-
Cosmetic outcome
Time frame: Two month
Presence or absence of scar
-
Operative time
Time frame: Operative time
Duration of procedure of both techniques
-
Over or under correction
Time frame: 2 month
Excessive or insufficient removal of foreskin (presence of redundant skin or compression of penile length)
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
Zagazig University
Other Gov
Registry information
Official study title
Bipolar Scissors Versus Classic Method for Circumcision
Important dates
- Study start
- 2016
- Primary completion
- 2018
- Study completion
- 2018
- First posted
- Aug 16, 2018
- Registry last updated
- Aug 16, 2018
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
The Effect of Two Different Interventions Applied During the Transfer of Children to the Operating Room for Circumcision on Fear, Anxiety, Comfort and Pain Levels
NCT07094555
Anxiety Disorders, Male Circumcision
Merkez, Kars, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsHigh Volume Caudal Study
NCT04263064
Male Circumcision
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsRandomized Trial Comparing PrePex Day 7 Foreskin Removal Procedure (FRP) to a Day 0 PrePex FRP .
NCT03223532
Male Circumcision
Kisumu, Nyanza, Kenya
View Trial DetailsPhase 4 Field Trial of the Unicirc Instrument With Tissue Adhesive
NCT02091726
Male Circumcision
Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa
View Trial Details