Solia S lead
DeviceThe Solia S pacing lead will be implanted in the LBB area for patients who meet all inclusion/exclusion criteria and give written informed consent.
NCT Number: NCT05251363
The purpose of the BIO-CONDUCT study is to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the BIOTRONIK Solia S pacing lead when implanted in the left bundle branch (LBB) area. Safety will be assessed by evaluating serious adverse device effects that occur through 3 months post-implant. Efficacy will be assessed by evaluating implant success rate.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Banner - University Medical Center Phoenix, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The Solia S pacing lead will be implanted in the LBB area for patients who meet all inclusion/exclusion criteria and give written informed consent.
Time frame: 3 months post implant
The overall rate of serious Solia S Left Bundle Branch (LBB) lead related adverse device effects and serious implant procedure events related to the Solia S LBB lead that occur through 3 months post-implant. The definition of adverse device effect is an untoward medical occurrence (e.g. disease, injury) related to the use of a study device. Pacemaker lead-related examples include events such as lead dislodgements or lead malfunction. The Solia S LBB lead complication-free rate is calculated as the number of subjects without one or more adverse device effect complications divided by the total number of study subjects successfully enrolled and subjects undergoing an unsuccessful implant attempt who have a qualifying primary safety endpoint event. Classification of adverse device related events from the pool of potential events is determined by a clinical events committee (CEC). The complication-free rate is expressed in percent.
Time frame: at implant procedure
The percentage of subjects with Solia S placed successfully in the LBBA divided by the total number of consented study subjects in whom an implant of Solia S in the LBBA was attempted.
Time frame: 12 months post implant
The change in the physical function Short Form-36 (SF-36, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey) QOL subscale was calculated as the mean change from baseline to 12-month follow-up for all subjects that completed both the baseline QOL and 12-month QOL questionnaire. The physical function subscale of Short Form-36 is comprised of ten questions out of the total of 36 questions. The responses to the ten questions relating to physical function were averaged at baseline and at 12 months. The difference in the averages (12 months minus baseline) is reported as the outcome for secondary endpoint 1. Note that each question and each component is scored such that a higher score defines a more favorable health state. Each is scored on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively.
Time frame: 6 months post implant
The overall rate of serious Solia S LBBA lead related adverse device effects and serious implant procedure events related to the Solia S LBBA lead that occur through 6 months post-implant. The Solia S LBBA lead complication-free rate per subject, which was calculated as the number of subjects without one or more complications divided by the total number of study subjects successfully enrolled and subjects undergoing an unsuccessful implant attempt who have a qualifying safety endpoint event. The complication-free rate is expressed in percentage of participants without SADE.
Time frame: 12 months post implant
The overall rate of serious Solia S LBBA lead related adverse device effects and serious implant procedure events related to the Solia S LBBA lead that occur through 12 months post-implant. The Solia S LBBA lead complication-free rate per subject, which was calculated as the number of subjects without one or more complications divided by the total number of study subjects successfully enrolled and subjects undergoing an unsuccessful implant attempt who have a qualifying safety endpoint event. The complication-free rate is expressed in percent.
Time frame: 3 months post implant
Pacing threshold measurements for Solia S leads implanted in the LBBA at the 3 month follow-up visit.
Time frame: 3 months post implant
R-wave sensing amplitude measurements for Solia S leads implanted in the LBBA at the 3 month follow-up visit.
Time frame: 3 months post implant
Pacing impedance measurements for Solia S leads implanted in the LBBA at the 3 month follow-up visit.
Time frame: 6 months post implant
Pacing threshold measurements for Solia S leads implanted in the LBBA at the 6 month follow-up visit.
Time frame: 6 months post implant
R-wave sensing amplitude measurements for Solia S leads implanted in the LBBA at the 6 month follow-up visit.
Time frame: 6 months post implant
Pacing impedance measurements for Solia S leads implanted in the LBBA at the 6 month follow-up visit.
Time frame: 12 months post implant
Pacing threshold measurements for Solia S leads implanted in the LBBA at the 12 month follow-up visit.
Time frame: 12 months post implant
R-wave sensing amplitude measurements for Solia S leads implanted in the LBBA at the 12 month follow-up visit.
Time frame: 12 months post implant
Pacing impedance measurements for Solia S leads implanted in the LBBA at the 12 month follow-up visit.
Biotronik, Inc.
Industry
Acronym: BIO-CONDUCT
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07209852
Arrhythmia, Sinus, Arrhythmias, Cardiac
Bruges, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT06540079
Arrhythmia, Sinus, Arrhythmias, Cardiac
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05887323
Arrhythmia, Sinus, Arrhythmias, Cardiac
Jonesboro, Arkansas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03719040
Arrhythmia, Sinus, Arrhythmias, Cardiac
Huntsville, Alabama, United States
View Trial Details