Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07284264

Biomarker-Integrated Digital Guidance for Early Alzheimer's Detection (BRIDGE-AD): A Nationwide Multicenter Study

The investigators propose a stepwise screening approach. The first step involves rapid digital pre-screening of cognitive function through three components: the SCD-9 questionnaire to capture subjective cognitive complaints, a digital cognitive assessment to evaluate objective performance, and a predictive model to estimate future dementia risk in cognitively normal individuals. The second step confirms the presence of AD pathology using blood-based biomarkers, with a head-to-head comparison of multiple novel candidates to identify those with the greatest diagnostic utility.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

50 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Background: Cognitive impairment represents a spectrum of conditions affecting memory, reasoning, and daily functioning, with Alzheimer's disease (AD) constituting 60-80% of dementia cases globally. The worldwide burden of AD has reached 56.9 million cases, with projections indicating this will escalate dramatically due to population aging, particularly in low- and middle-income countries which will bear 65% of the economic burden by 2050.

The progression of AD typically involves a prolonged preclinical phase lasting 15-20 years before symptom onset. This extended window, coupled with the mild cognitive impairment stage, presents critical opportunities for early intervention. Contemporary diagnostic paradigms have shifted from symptom-based to pathology-driven criteria, enabling detection through biomarkers during asymptomatic phases. Community settings serve as ideal platforms for population-wide monitoring, where systematic screening combined with interventions like lifestyle modifications and cognitive training may also delay disease progression.

Current cognitive impairment screening systems face considerable challenges in terms of accuracy, efficiency, and scalability. Standard neuropsychological assessments are constrained by practice effects, subjective scoring, limited sensitivity to early cognitive changes, and the need for trained professionals. Emerging digital tools can improve testing efficiency and maintain high accuracy, offering benefits such as automated scoring and reduced reliance on specialized personnel. Meanwhile, predicting the future risk of dementia in cognitively normal individuals could enable personalized monitoring strategies. In the era of disease-modifying therapies, early detection of AD pathology is essential for initiating timely interventions. Therefore, there is an urgent need for accessible, scalable, and cost-effective screening approaches that can detect both cognitive symptoms and AD pathology, particularly in aging populations and resource-limited settings where the burden of dementia is growing most rapidly.

Our research proposes a stepwise screening approach. The first step involves rapid digital pre-screening of cognitive function through three components: the SCD-9 questionnaire to capture subjective cognitive complaints, a digital cognitive assessment to evaluate objective performance, and a predictive model to estimate future dementia risk in cognitively normal individuals. The second step confirms the presence of AD pathology using blood-based biomarkers, with a head-to-head comparison of multiple novel candidates to identify those with the greatest diagnostic utility.

Research Objective: Develop a screening and diagnostic pathway integrating digital cognitive tools and blood biomarkers for early detection of AD-related cognitive impairment in community populations.

Innovations: (1) Enhance screening efficiency via digital cognitive assessments. (2) Improve diagnostic accuracy by combining blood biomarkers. (3) Establish a community-based operational model tailored to China's primary healthcare system, offering a scalable reference for dementia action plans in developing countries.

Study Design: A nationwide, multicenter study. Study Setting: Nationwide multicenter, encompassing Beijing, Shenzhen (Guangdong Province), Haikou (Hainan Province), Shenyang (Liaoning Province), Yichun (Jiangxi Province), and Ningxia (Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region).

Sample Size: A total of 6,000 participants. The sample sizes will be allocated proportionally, based on the population aged 50 and above in each multicenter community.

Study Population: Community residents aged 50 and above who have resided in the community for over one-year, self-report no cognitive impairment disorder or use of anti-dementia medications, and are capable of communicating in Chinese. Participants with a self-reported or clinically confirmed diagnosis of severe psychiatric disorders, such as bipolar disorder or schizophrenia, as well as those with medical conditions that impair their ability to complete cognitive assessments, were excluded.

Screening Strategy:

  • Part 1: The first screening step includes the SCD-9 questionnaire (a brief self-assessment of cognitive decline), the PCAT digital cognitive test (comprising face-name memory and symbol matching tasks), and a dementia risk prediction model based on validated models identified through a systematic review.

Gold standard of cognitive impairment: Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR), evaluated by a qualified physician.

  • Part 2: The second diagnostic step targets AD pathology using multiple blood-based biomarkers, including conventional markers (p-tau217, p-tau181, Aβ42/40) and emerging microRNA candidates. Various assay platforms, such as Simoa and CLEIA, will be utilized for biomarker quantification.

Gold standard of AD pathology: amyloid PET scan.

Outcome Measures:

(1) Primary outcome: Sensitivity and specificity of the AD-related cognitive impairment screening and diagnosis program. (2) Secondary outcome: program completion rate, time to completion, community feasibility, compliance, and health-economic evaluation (cost per participant) for screening and diagnosis.

Statistical Methods: Statistical analysis will be conducted using the screening research analysis framework and health economics calculation theory, with P<0.05 considered statistically significant.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • adults aged 50 and above;
  • living in community for at least one year and having established medical records;
  • denying a history of cognitive disorders (mild cognitive impairment, dementia, Alzheimer's disease, etc.) and the use of anti-dementia drugs (cholinesterase inhibitors or memantine, etc.);
  • agreeing to participate in the study;
  • individual or their relatives can communicate normally in Chinese.
  • high-risk groups for dementia(including:1. Complaints of cognitive decline and/or statements by the informant;2. History of AD in first-degree relatives;3. Known ApoE e4 carrier.)

Exclusion criteria

  • Self-reporting or confirmation through inquiry indicates the presence of severe mental disorders, such as bipolar disorder or schizophrenia, etc.
  • Having a disease that makes it impossible to complete the cognitive assessment.

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Sensitivity and specificity of the AD-related cognitive impairment screening and diagnosis program.

    Time frame: Baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Community feasibility and compliance

    Time frame: Baseline

    Evaluate the feasibility and practicality of implementing cognitive impairment screening in the community environment.

    The proportion of people who underwent screening among the total number of people who met the screening criteria.

  2. Program completion rate

    Time frame: Baseline

    Evaluating the practicability of implementing dementia screening in the community environment.

    The proportion of people with positive screening results among those who completed the cognitive impairment diagnosis assessment.

  3. Time to completion

    Time frame: Baseline

    It is calculated by recording the time(minites) it takes for each patient to complete the screening interview. During the research process, the software background recorded the time it took for each screened individual to complete the screening module (SCD, predictive model and digital cognition), and the scale assessors recorded the time required for the diagnosis of cognitive impairment (medical history +MMSE+CDR).

  4. health-economic evaluatio for screening and diagnosis

    Time frame: Baseline

    Including the cost(yuan) of screening the APP, the cost of project management, the cost of neuropsychological assessment, etc.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Yi Tang, M.D., Ph.D

CONTACT

[email protected]

00861083199456

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Dec 16, 2025
Registry last updated
Dec 16, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.