Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03268187

Biofeedback-based Relaxation Training or Self-alert Training to Alleviate Fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis Patients.

The presented study compares the effectiveness of a biofeedback-based relaxation training with the effectiveness of a biofeedback-based self-alert training on the reduction of fatigue in multiple sclerosis patients using a between groups design. Furthermore, the relation of fatigue in multiple sclerosis patients and autonomic potentials as well as the performance in a vigilance task will be examined.

The relaxation training is based on the principle of progressive muscle relaxation according to Jacobsen. The patient is asked to tense all muscles in their face and perceive consciously the relaxation afterwards according to verbal cues. In the self-alert training condition, the patient will hear verbal cues to increase their attention. In both conditions the external cues given will be reduced in four phases until the patient has to cue himself. The patient is advised to track the changes in the skin resistance mirrored by biofeedback on a screen.

In both conditions the training will be split on two days. During the whole examination heart rate and skin resistance will be recorded. The allocation to the training happens randomly. On the first day the patient will complete questionnaires to survey depression and apathy and do a baseline vigilance task. Before and after the vigilance task the current fatigue status will be assessed using a visual analogue scale. Afterwards an introduction in the treatment method will be given.

On the second day the introduction into the training will be repeated. Afterwards a short time vigilance task will be done and questionnaires to survey fatigue and sleep behaviour and quality will be completed. Subsequently the last part of the training (no external cues) will be done. The examination will be completed by a long-time vigilance task. Before and after the vigilance task the current fatigue status will be assessed using a visual analogue scale.

It is hypothesised that especially the biofeedback-based self-alert training has a positive effect on fatigue and the vigilance performance in multiple sclerosis patients, as it increases the ectodermal activity and increases the sympathetic activation. It was shown that phasic changes of the skin resistance are correlated with an increase of neuronal activity in the brain areas relevant for vigilance (Critchley et al., 2002; Nagai et al., 2004). The relaxation training will reduce the sympatho-adrenergic excitation disposition and reduce the level of activity. Consequently, we do not expect an alleviation of the perceived fatigue according to our underlying model (Hanken et al., 2016). In addition, it is hypothesized that, independent from the treatment, autonomic potentials correlate with fatigue.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Rehazentrum Wilhelmshaven

Wilhelmshaven, Lower Saxony, 26382, Germany

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • at least a moderate cognitive fatigue (Fatigue Scale for Motor and Cognition minimum 22)
  • clinical diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis

Exclusion criteria

  • psychiatric conditions independent from Multiple Sclerosis
  • Pregnancy
  • regular intake of psychostimulants
  • no relapse in the last four weeks before
  • no cortisone therapy in the last four weeks before
  • patients with schizophrenia or serious personality disorders

Treatment and study plan

biofeedback

Device

The skin conductance of the patient is measured and fed back to the patient via screen.

Self-Alert Training

Behavioral

Self-Alert Training

Relaxation Training

Behavioral

Relaxation Training

Primary outcomes

  1. Reaction Time of Vigilance Task (TAP)

    Time frame: Vigilance is measured at the beginning of the first day before the training introduction as well as after the training at the second day.

    Changes of the reaction time in the vigilance task

  2. Subjective Fatigue (VAS)

    Time frame: Before and after the long-term vigilance tasks at day 1 and 2

    The current perceived fatigue

Secondary outcomes

  1. Omissions and errors of Vigilance Task (TAP)

    Time frame: At day one before the introduction in the training and at day two after the training.

    The number of omissions and errors made in the Vigilance Task

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Rehazentrum Wilhelmshaven

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Aug 31, 2017
Registry last updated
Apr 11, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.