SocraTec R&D GmbH
Erfurt, Thuringia, 99084, Germany
NCT Number: NCT06855576
This study aims to evaluate the bioequivalence of new formulated orodispersible tablet (ODT) containing 500 milligram (mg) paracetamol in comparison to the European marketed Alvedon (paracetamol) 500 mg film-coated tablets and the Australian marketed Panadol (paracetamol) 500 mg film-coated tablets as reference products.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–55 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1
Erfurt, Thuringia, 99084, Germany
This will be a single center, open-label, randomized (order of treatments), balanced, 3-period, 3-sequence, single dose, change-over trial with oral administration under fasting conditions separated by a washout period of at least 72 hours. Fifty-four healthy participants of both sexes (27 male, 27 female) are intended to be randomized to obtain 42 evaluable participants. The investigational products will be administered in fasted state as single oral doses of 500 mg paracetamol tablet. 1 tablet of test and 1 film-coated tablet of reference 1 and 1 film-coated tablet of reference 2 will be administered in a cross-over manner. Blood sampling will be performed over 24-hour post dose in order to characterize pharmacokinetic parameters.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Experimental Paracetamol 500 mg ODT
Marketed Paracetamol 500 mg film-coated tablet
Marketed Paracetamol 500 mg film-coated tablet
Time frame: Within one hour prior to dosing, at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 50, 60, 75, 90, 120, 150, 180 minutes and at 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 and 24 hours following dosing in each treatment period
Cmax was defined as maximum observed post-dose plasma concentration for paracetamol. Blood samples were collected at indicated timepoints for the analysis of Cmax. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were determined by non-compartmental analysis.
Time frame: Within one hour prior to dosing, at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 50, 60, 75, 90, 120, 150, 180 minutes and at 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 and 24 hours following dosing in each treatment period
AUC0-tlast was defined as area under the concentration vs. time curve from dosing time to the last measurement time point with a concentration value above the lower limit of quantitation, calculated by means of the linear up/log down method (linear trapezoidal rule for increases in concentration/logarithmic trapezoidal rule for decreases in concentrations). Blood samples were collected at indicated timepoints for the analysis of AUC0-tlast. PK parameters were determined by non-compartmental analysis.
Time frame: Within one hour prior to dosing, at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 50, 60, 75, 90, 120, 150, 180 minutes and at 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 and 24 hours following dosing in each treatment period
Blood samples were collected at indicated timepoints for the analysis of tmax. PK parameters were determined by non-compartmental analysis.
Time frame: Within one hour prior to dosing, at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 50, 60, 75, 90, 120, 150, 180 minutes and at 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 and 24 hours following dosing in each treatment period
Cmax was defined as maximum observed post-dose plasma concentration for paracetamol. Blood samples were collected at indicated timepoints for the analysis of Cmax. PK parameters were determined by non-compartmental analysis.
Time frame: Within one hour prior to dosing, at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 50, 60, 75, 90, 120, 150, 180 minutes and at 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 and 24 hours following dosing in each treatment period
AUC0-tlast was defined as area under the concentration vs. time curve from dosing time to the last measurement time point with a concentration value above the lower limit of quantitation, calculated by means of the linear up/log down method (linear trapezoidal rule for increases in concentration/logarithmic trapezoidal rule for decreases in concentrations. Blood samples were collected at indicated timepoints for the analysis of AUC0-tlast). PK parameters were determined by non-compartmental analysis.
Time frame: Within one hour prior to dosing, at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 50, 60, 75, 90, 120, 150, 180 minutes and at 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 and 24 hours following dosing in each treatment period
Blood samples were collected at indicated timepoints for the analysis of tmax. PK parameters were determined by non-compartmental analysis.
Time frame: Within one hour prior to dosing, at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 50, 60, 75, 90, 120, 150, 180 minutes and at 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 and 24 hours following dosing in each treatment period
AUC (0-inf) equal to(=) AUC0-tlast addition(+) AUCexpol, where AUCexpol = Clast/Lz, where Clast was observed concentration at the last time point with a concentration value above the lower limit of quantitation, directly taken from measured concentration values and Lz was apparent terminal elimination rate constant determined by log-linear regression(Lz); the regression generally involved at least 3 consecutive measurable concentrations that decreased over time. Blood samples were collected at indicated timepoints for the analysis of AUC (0-inf). PK parameters were determined by non-compartmental analysis.
Time frame: Within one hour prior to dosing, at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 50, 60, 75, 90, 120, 150, 180 minutes and at 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 and 24 hours following dosing in each treatment period
AUC (0-inf)= AUC0-tlast + AUCexpol, where AUCexpol = Clast/Lz, where Clast was observed concentration at the last time point with a concentration value above the lower limit of quantitation, directly taken from measured concentration values and Lz was apparent terminal elimination rate constant determined by log-linear regression; the regression generally involved at least 3 consecutive measurable concentrations that decreased over time. Blood samples were collected at indicated timepoints for the analysis of AUC (0-inf). PK parameters were determined by non-compartmental analysis.
Time frame: Within one hour prior to dosing, at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 50, 60, 75, 90, 120, 150, 180 minutes and at 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 and 24 hours following dosing in each treatment period
AUC (0-inf)= AUC0-tlast + AUCexpol, where AUCexpol = Clast/Lz, where Clast was observed concentration at the last time point with a concentration value above the lower limit of quantitation, directly taken from measured concentration values and Lz was apparent terminal elimination rate constant determined by log-linear regression; the regression generally involved at least 3 consecutive measurable concentrations that decreased over time. Blood samples were collected at indicated timepoints for the analysis of AUC (0-inf). PK parameters were determined by non-compartmental analysis.
Time frame: Within one hour prior to dosing, at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 50, 60, 75, 90, 120, 150, 180 minutes and at 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 and 24 hours following dosing in each treatment period
AUCexpol%= AUCexpol multiplied by (*)100/AUC0-inf, where AUCexpol = Clast/Lz. Blood samples were collected at indicated timepoints for the analysis of AUCexpol%. PK parameters were determined by non-compartmental analysis.
Time frame: Within one hour prior to dosing, at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 50, 60, 75, 90, 120, 150, 180 minutes and at 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 and 24 hours following dosing in each treatment period
AUCexpol%= AUCexpol*100/AUC0-inf, where AUCexpol = Clast/Lz. Blood samples were collected at indicated timepoints for the analysis of AUCexpol%. PK parameters were determined by non-compartmental analysis.
Time frame: Within one hour prior to dosing, at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 50, 60, 75, 90, 120, 150, 180 minutes and at 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 and 24 hours following dosing in each treatment period
AUCexpol%= AUCexpol*100/AUC0-inf, where AUCexpol = Clast/Lz. Blood samples were collected at indicated timepoints for the analysis of AUCexpol%. PK parameters were determined by non-compartmental analysis.
Time frame: Within one hour prior to dosing, at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 50, 60, 75, 90, 120, 150, 180 minutes and at 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 and 24 hours following dosing in each treatment period
Lz was an apparent terminal elimination rate constant determined by log-linear regression; the regression generally involved at least 3 consecutive measurable concentrations that decreased over time. Blood samples were collected at indicated timepoints for the analysis of Lz. PK parameters were determined by non-compartmental analysis.
Time frame: Within one hour prior to dosing, at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 50, 60, 75, 90, 120, 150, 180 minutes and at 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 and 24 hours following dosing in each treatment period
Lz was an apparent terminal elimination rate constant determined by log-linear regression; the regression generally involved at least 3 consecutive measurable concentrations that decreased over time. Blood samples were collected at indicated timepoints for the analysis of Lz. PK parameters were determined by non-compartmental analysis.
Time frame: Within one hour prior to dosing, at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 50, 60, 75, 90, 120, 150, 180 minutes and at 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 and 24 hours following dosing in each treatment period
Lz was an apparent terminal elimination rate constant determined by log-linear regression; the regression generally involved at least 3 consecutive measurable concentrations that decreased over time. Blood samples were collected at indicated timepoints for the analysis of Lz. PK parameters were determined by non-compartmental analysis.
Time frame: Within one hour prior to dosing, at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 50, 60, 75, 90, 120, 150, 180 minutes and at 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 and 24 hours following dosing in each treatment period
t1/2 = ln(2) / Lz. Blood samples were collected at indicated timepoints for the analysis of t1/2. PK parameters were determined by non-compartmental analysis.
Time frame: Within one hour prior to dosing, at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 50, 60, 75, 90, 120, 150, 180 minutes and at 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 and 24 hours following dosing in each treatment period
t1/2 = ln(2) / Lz. Blood samples were collected at indicated timepoints for the analysis of t1/2. PK parameters were determined by non-compartmental analysis.
Time frame: Within one hour prior to dosing, at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 50, 60, 75, 90, 120, 150, 180 minutes and at 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 and 24 hours following dosing in each treatment period
t1/2 = ln(2) / Lz. Blood samples were collected at indicated timepoints for the analysis of t1/2. PK parameters were determined by non-compartmental analysis.
HALEON
Industry
A Phase I, Randomised, Open Label, Single Center, Single Oral Dose, Three Treatment, Three Period, Three Sequence, Change-over Bioequivalence Study of Paracetamol Orodispersible Tablet 500 mg (Haleon) to Assess Bioequivalence With Alvedon 500 mg Film-Coated Tablet (Haleon, Sweden) and Panadol 500 mg Film-Coated Tablet (Haleon, Australia) in Healthy Adult Subjects Under Fasting Conditions
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01334944
Body Temperature Changes, Fever
San Diego, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05366049
Body Temperature Changes, Fever
Istanbul, Fatih, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT04715932
Abdominal Pain, Anosmia
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT02583399
Body Temperature Changes, Fever
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
View Trial Details