Nuvisan GmbH
Neu-Ulm, 89231, Germany
NCT Number: NCT04314037
The purpose of this study is to assess the bioequivalence (BE) of new coated Cesol tablet (Test) versus Biltricide tablets (Comparator) in healthy male participants. Praziquantel (rac-PZQ) is the active ingredient for Cesol and Biltricide tablets.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–55 year
Male
Interventional
Phase 1
Neu-Ulm, 89231, Germany
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participant will receive coated cesol tablet in sequence 1 (Day 1 and Day 15) and in sequence 2 (Day 8 and Day 22). A washout period of 7 days will be maintained between 4 treatment periods.
Other names: Praziquantel
Participant will receive biltricide tablet in Sequence 1 (Day 8 and Day 22) and in sequence 2 (Day 1 and Day 15). A washout period of 7 days will be maintained between 4 treatment periods.
Other names: Praziquantel
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 8.0, 9.0, 10.0 and 12 hours post-dose in each treatment period
Cmax was obtained directly from the concentration versus time curve.
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 8.0, 9.0, 10.0 and 12 hours post-dose in each treatment period
Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time zero to the last sampling time t at which the concentration was at or above the lower limit of quantification (LLQ). AUC0-t was calculated according to the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule.
Time frame: Baseline up to Day 27
Adverse event (AE): any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. Serious AE: an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important. TEAE: AE with onset after start of treatment or with onset date before the treatment start date but worsening after the treatment start date. TEAEs included both serious and non-serious TEAEs. Treatment-related TEAEs: reasonably related to the study intervention. Number of participants with TEAEs and treatment related TEAEs were reported.
Time frame: Baseline up to Day 27
Severity of TEAEs were graded using Qualitative Toxicity Scale, as follows: Mild: Participant is aware of the event or symptom, but the event or symptom is easily tolerated; Moderate: Participant experiences sufficient discomfort to interfere with or reduce his or her usual level of activity; Severe: Significant impairment of functioning: the participant is unable to carry out his or her usual activities. Number of participants with TEAEs by severity were reported.
Time frame: Baseline up to Day 27
Laboratory investigation included hematology, biochemistry and urinalysis. Clinical relevance was determined by the investigator. The number of participants with clinically relevant changes from baseline in laboratory parameters were reported.
Time frame: Baseline up to Day 27
Vital signs included body temperature, systolic and diastolic blood pressure and pulse rate. Clinical relevance was determined by the investigator. The number of participants with clinically relevant changes from baseline in vital signs were reported.
Time frame: Baseline up to Day 27
12-lead ECG recordings included rhythm, heart rate (as measured by RR interval), PR interval, QRS duration and QT interval. The corrected QT interval (QTcF) was calculated using Fridericia's formula. 12-lead ECG recordings were obtained after the participants have rested for at least 10 minutes in semisupine position. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator. The number of participants with clinically significant changes from baseline in 12-Lead ECG findings were reported.
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 8.0, 9.0, 10.0 and 12 hours post-dose in each treatment period
Cmax was obtained directly from the concentration versus time curve.
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 8.0, 9.0, 10.0 and 12 hours post-dose in each treatment period
Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time zero to the last sampling time t at which the concentration was at or above the lower limit of quantification (LLQ). AUC0-t was calculated according to the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule.
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 8.0, 9.0, 10.0 and 12 hours post-dose in each treatment period
AUC0-inf was calculated by combining AUC0-t and AUCextra. AUCextra represents an extrapolated value obtained by Clast pred/Lambda z, where Clast pred was the calculated plasma concentration at the last sampling time point at which the measured plasma concentration is at or above the Lower Limit of quantification (LLQ) and Lambda z was the apparent terminal rate constant determined by log-linear regression analysis of the measured plasma concentrations of the terminal log-linear phase.
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 8.0, 9.0, 10.0 and 12 hours post-dose in each treatment period
Tmax was obtained directly from the concentration versus time curve.
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 8.0, 9.0, 10.0 and 12 hours post-dose in each treatment period
Time prior to the first measurable (non-zero) concentration; calculated as last time point at which the concentration is less than (<) Lower Limit of Quantification (LLQ) before the occurrence of the first quantifiable concentration.
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 8.0, 9.0, 10.0 and 12 hours post-dose in each treatment period
Elimination Half Life (T1/2) was defined as the time required for the concentration or amount of drug in the body to be reduced by one-half. T1/2 was calculated by natural log 2 divided by Lambda z. Lambda z was determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve using linear regression method.
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 8.0, 9.0, 10.0 and 12 hours post-dose in each treatment period
Lambda z was determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve using linear regression method.
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 8.0, 9.0, 10.0 and 12 hours post-dose in each treatment period
CL/f was a measure of the rate at which a drug was metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes. CL/f was calculated as Dose/AUC0-inf, where AUC0-inf was estimated by determining the total area under the curve of the concentration versus time curve extrapolated to infinity. AUC0-inf was calculated as AUC0-t + Clast pred/Lambda Z, where Clast pred was the calculated plasma concentration at the last sampling time point at which the measured plasma concentration was at or above the lower limit of quantification (LLQ) and Lambda Z was the apparent terminal rate constant determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve.
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 8.0, 9.0, 10.0 and 12 hours post-dose in each treatment period
Vz/f: the distribution of a study drug between plasma and the rest of the body after oral dosing. For single dose Vz/f = Dose/(AUC0-inf*Lambda Z), where AUC0-inf = (AUC0-t + Clast pred/Lambda Z). Clastpred was the calculated plasma concentration at the last sampling time point at which the measured plasma concentration was at or above the LLQ and Lambda Z = the apparent terminal rate constant determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve.
Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
Industry
A Phase I, Open-label, Randomized, Four-period, Crossover, Fully Replicated, Reference-scaled, Single Center Study to Assess the Bioequivalence of a Single Oral Dose of 1200 mg of the Coated Cesol Tablet Formulation Versus Comparator Biltricide® in Healthy Male Volunteers
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06068257
Breast Cancer, Breast Diseases
Orlando, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06702423
Healthy
London, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT07223164
Healthy
Irvine, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05595902
Healthy
Kadıköy, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details