REAplan®
Devicemotor skill learning with the REAplan® rehabilitation robot, to be performed with both arms
NCT Number: NCT05760846
The subacute phase of stroke provides a window into how a lesion perturbs sensorimotor functions prior to reorganisation driven by plasticity and neurorehabilitation. The recovery from motor impairment has been extensively studied, but it is currently unknown whether motor skill learning (MSkL) is enhanced or impaired during acute stroke, especially bimanual motor skill learning (bim-MSkL), which likely requires more motor-attentional-cognitive resources than unimanual MSkL.
The goals of this project are: to determine the neural substrates critical to achieve proximal and distal bimanual motor skill learning (bim-MSkL) by specifying whether (sub)acute stroke to different brain areas (cortical and subcortical) induce specific deficits in bimanual and/or distal bim-MSkL, which behavioral components are involved in bim-MSkL, and whether damage to the motor, sensory and inter-hemispheric pathways specifically impairs proximal and/or distal bim-MSkL.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–90 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
CHU UCL Namur, Yvoir, Namur, Belgium
Over 3 consecutive days, the patients will be evaluated and will train on the rehabilitation robot REAplan® (http://www.axinesis.com/) to assess proximal bim-MSkL and on the manual dexterity tool Dextrain Manipulandum (https://www.dextrain.com/) to assess distal bim-MSkL.
For proximal bim-MSkL, patients will train over the 3 days on the serious game Circuit on the bimanual REAplan® and will be randomised to two different bimanual versions. By this means, the investigators will explore the components of bim-MSkL in acute stroke patients.
The motor skill learning setup (Circuit) that was developed and successfully used in healthy individuals and stroke patients has already been implemented in the REAplan® environment and will be used as innovative serious games based on a speed/accuracy trade-off (SAT), allowing a detailed analysis of motor skill learning components (speed, accuracy, SAT, movement smoothness, dynamics...). For the serious game Circuit, who based on motor skill learning, the subjects will have to practice a complex circuit and move a cursor as quickly and accurately as possible by controlling the handles of the robot with both arms.
For distal bim-MSkL, patients will train on a complex sequence of finger movements involving both hands. Each day, several successive repetitions of the sequence will be displayed, corresponding to one block. 3 to 6 blocks will be repeated, each separated by 30 sec of rest. After training on the third day, a new sequence will be repeated for 3 blocks to assess generalization.
To explore the role of different brain structures in bim-MskL, Voxel-based Lesion Symptom Mapping (VLSM) based on high-resolution brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, will be used to analyse the relationship between tissue damage and proximal/distal bim-MskL scores on a voxel-by-voxel basis.
Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) will quantify the integrity of several white matter tracts, allowing through correlation analyses to unveil the white matter tracts crucial to achieve proximal and/or distal bim-MskL.
In addition, several "classical" clinical scales and tests will be used to evaluate overall motor-sensory-cognitive functions.
In addition to the (sub)acute stroke patients, a group of healthy individuals who will not undergo MRI (n=60) will be enrolled as control group. Subjects in this group will also be randomized 1/1 in the two versions of the bimanual Circuit task on the REAplan® robot.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
ACUTE STROKE PATIENTS:
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS:
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
motor skill learning with the REAplan® rehabilitation robot, to be performed with both arms
motor skill learning with the Dextrain Manipulandum® dexterity tool to be performed with both hands
Time frame: change between baseline (Day 1) and after training (Day 3)
bimanual Speed/Accuracy Trade-off: mathematical computation of the relationship between speed and accuracy
Time frame: change between baseline (Day 1) and after training (Day 3)
bimanual Coordination factor, mathematical measure of the phase coherence between speeds of both arms
Time frame: change between baseline (Day 1) and after training (Day 3)
bimanual forces, forces exerted in the wrong direction by each arm (Newtons)
Time frame: change between baseline (Day 1) and after training (Day 3)
Tracking error between the actual applied force and the target force
Time frame: change between baseline (Day 1) and after training (Day 3)
bimanual Coordination factor, mathematical measure of the phase coherence between speeds of both thumb-index clamps
Time frame: change between baseline (Day 1) and after training (Day 3)
time between the target appearance and when the force applied exceeds threshold
Time frame: change between baseline (Day 1) and after training (Day 3)
time between the reaction time and reaching the plateau
Time frame: change between baseline (Day 1) and after training (Day 3)
binary measure of unasked fingers activated above the force threshold
Time frame: change between baseline (Day 1) and after training (Day 3)
time of plateau maintenance
Time frame: Baseline
Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI)
Time frame: Baseline
Fractional Anisotropy
Time frame: Day1
Tests impairments of the upper limb after stroke. Range: 0-66. A higher score means less impairment.
Time frame: Day 1
Measure disabilities of the upper limb after stroke. Range: 0-100. A higher score means less disabilities in activities of daily living.
Time frame: Day 1
Tests the short-term memory, visuospatial skills, executive functions, attention, concentration, working memory, language and orientation in time and space. Range: 0-30, higher score means no cognitive impairment.
Time frame: Day 1
Visual Analog Scale to evaluate fatigue = a psychometric response scale which can be used in questionnaires. It is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured. When responding to a VAS item, respondents specify their level of agreement to a statement by indicating a position along a continuous line between two end-points. Range : 0- 10. A higher score means a higher level of fatigue.
Time frame: Day 1
A prognostic determinant of the function of the hemiparetic upper limb (UL) after a stroke. For each of the 2 subitems, the range is 0-5. A score of 5 means normal power. A score of 0 means no contraction possible.
Time frame: Day 1
clinical measure of spasticity. For each of the 8 subitems, the range is 0-4. A higher score means a higher level of spasticity
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Coralie van Ravestyn, MSc
CONTACT
Yves Vandermeeren, MD, PhD
CONTACT
University Hospital of Mont-Godinne
Other
Exploring the Neural Substrates of Proximal and Distal Bimanual Motor Skill Learning Through Robotics and Multimodal Brain Imaging
Acronym: MLAS4
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06107010
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Créteil, France
View Trial DetailsNCT04187209
Behavior, Brain Diseases
Berck, France
View Trial DetailsNCT04694001
Behavior, Brain Diseases
Brussels, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT05378035
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Arterial Thromboembolism
Hong Kong
View Trial Details