Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01345695

Bihar Evaluation of Social Franchising and Telemedicine

This study will conduct an evaluation of the World Health Partners (WHP) private provider project to see if the social franchising and telemedicine project has an impact on health outcomes in treatment vs. control areas. The evaluation will also estimate specific parameters of the WHP program that can be used to maximize financial sustainability and replicability/scalability of the program.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

BEST

Patna, Bihar, India

About this study

In 2011, World Health Partners (WHP) will launch a large social franchising program of healthcare delivery in Bihar, India, with funding from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF). The WHP project is particularly innovative in integrating a social franchising delivery model with a telemedicine platform. Although social franchising models of delivery are becoming increasingly common, to our knowledge, none of these efforts has been rigorously evaluated.

COHESIVE-India plans to undertake an evaluation of the BMGF-financed WHP project. The overarching focus of the evaluation project (called Bihar Evaluation of Social Franchising and Telemedicine (BEST)) is to provide evidence on the performance and effectiveness of the WHP program. In addition to studying the overall impact and effectiveness of the social franchising and telemedicine program, the evaluation will estimate how the WHP model influences outcomes related to two target diseases of interest to BMGF: childhood diarrhea and childhood pneumonia.

The Evaluation Design The core objective of the evaluation is to estimate the causal impact of the WHP program on BMGF target disease outcomes as well as other indicators of its primary health care success. The key design feature of the evaluation is that it relies on the franchisee network model of the WHP program. The evaluation design involves identifying villages in Bihar that have asymmetric digital subscriber line (ADSL) connectivity where WHP is likely to find providers who would participate in the program. The areas surrounding these villages that form catchment areas for providers will be identified; 360 such areas will be randomly sampled from the list and divided into 180 treatment and 180 control areas for implementation of the WHP program.

The study also includes a detailed costing component to estimate the costs associated with the target diseases and the benefits from the program intervention. In doing so, the evaluation strategy addresses specific policy-relevant questions about sustainability, affordability, replicability, and future Government support for privately provided healthcare options in Bihar as well as in other parts of India.

In addition, COHESIVE-India, with funding from external sources also plans to conduct studies that will provide insights on how to improve the effectiveness of the WHP model, as well as its financial sustainability. These studies include the distribution of vouchers for WHP services to estimate household's willingness to pay for them, as well experiments on financial incentives to learn how to improve the performance of network providers.

This evaluation is closely aligned with the objectives of the Government of Bihar to reduce the burden of disease. Through a rigorous evaluation of the WHP program, this study will provide evidence on whether this model of rural health service delivery is efficient and whether it can be scaled up. The stated goals of the WHP program indicate the many potential health and economic benefits to the people of Bihar. The evaluation will provide an empirical and objective assessment of the impact of WHP's effort on quality of care available in rural areas (the program anticipates a significant improvement), increases in access to healthcare providers and improved drug supply, reductions in time lapse between onset of disease and optimal care, as well as reductions in unnecessary healthcare expenditures.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Households with children age < 60 months
  • Persons with tuberculosis or visceral leishmaniasis
  • Rural private sector medical providers

Exclusion criteria

  • Households without children
  • Households with children aged > 60 months

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Improvements in population based health outcomes

    Time frame: Baseline; 3 years

    Improvements in population based health outcomes in the treatment vs. the control areas

Secondary outcomes

  1. Improvements in population based health outcomes for childhood diarrhea

    Time frame: Baseline; 3 years

    Proportion of children with diarrhea in the last two weeks who were treated with zinc

  2. Improvements in population based health outcomes for childhood pneumonia

    Time frame: Baseline; 3 years

    Proportion of children with suspected pneumonia in the past two weeks who received a full course of antibiotics (five days)

  3. Cost-effectiveness of the service model

    Time frame: Baseline; 3 years

    Through micro-experiments, we hope to gain insights on how to improve the cost effectiveness of the WHP model, as well as evaluate its financial sustainability. We will also evaluate whether the are overall improvements in the population level health indicators in the treatment vs. the control areas.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Duke University

Other

Collaborators

  • Institute of Socio-Economic Research in Development and Democracy (ISERDD)
  • Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI)
  • Sambodhi Research and Communication Pvt., Ltd.
  • Stanford University
  • University College, London

Registry information

Official study title

Bihar Evaluation of Social Franchising and Telemedicine in India

Acronym: BEST

Important dates

Study start
2011
Primary completion
2014
Study completion
2015
First posted
May 2, 2011
Registry last updated
Dec 16, 2015

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.