Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04257864

Bevacizumab Versus Docetaxel/Erlotinib on Tumor Metrics in Patients With Previously Untreated Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer

To determine the more effective dosing sequence of intermittent erlotinib and docetaxel for treating patients with the diagnosis of advanced Non-Small-Lung-Cancer.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

In 2008, the Hellenic Co-operative Oncology group (HeCOG) initiated a randomized phase II study to determine the comparative efficacy of intermittent docetaxel/erlotinib chemotherapy, with erlotinib given for twelve consecutive days either before (group A) or after (group B) docetaxel, in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non small cell lung cancer. Docetaxel chemotherapy was considered one of the valid non-platinum containing therapeutic options at that time and today represents one of the approved second-line treatment options after failure of first-line platinum based chemotherapy. The trial was terminated early due to slow accrual after enrollment of 51 patients and was published in 2014, showing no clinically meaningful difference between the two treatment arms.

Based on the aforementioned trial population,a parallel radiological study was conducted, evaluating sequential tumor metrics on computed tomography performed at baseline and after each cycle of treatment in patients receiving either bevacizumab or docetaxel/erlotinib. Given the differential mechanism of action of these agents, it was hypothesized that the different parameters of radiological tumor response evaluation, namely the maximum diameter, tumor volume and tumor density, would respond differently for each therapeutic category (a chemotherapeutic agent, a molecular agent and and an anti-angiogenic agent). For bevacizumab, in particular, it was hypothesized that its unique mechanism of action, inducing central tumor necrosis and subsequent shrinkage, would lead to completely different tumor metrics as compared to the other two agents. Herein the final results of this analysis are presented, showing the comparison of the three agents in terms of tumor response metrics, as evaluated in CT scans performed at baseline and after each cycle of treatment

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male and female patients aged 18 to 75 years inclusive, with histologically confirmed metastatic non small cell lung cancer will be enrolled.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 - 1.
  • Presence of measurable or evaluable disease (lesions that are present but do not fulfil the criteria for measurable disease).

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients who have undergone complete tumor resection after responding to platinum based chemotherapy.

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Tumor response

    Time frame: Every 12 -16 weeks

    Evaluation of response using RECIST 1.1 criteria (REF) was based on the measurement of a total of 5 measurable lesions.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Impact of Bevacizumab Versus Docetaxel/Erlotinib on Tumor Metrics in Patients With Previously Untreated Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Study by the Hellenic Co-operative Oncology Group

Important dates

Study start
2008
Primary completion
2010
Study completion
2014
First posted
Feb 6, 2020
Registry last updated
Feb 10, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.