Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02825615

Better Arterial Cannulation Technique With Different Hemodynamics

Purpose Two techniques of radial artery cannulation, ultrasound guided (USG) and conventional method (CM) were compared to find the better technique in general and in different hemodynamic subsets of patients.

Method This is a prospective randomized, single center study of 100 patients. The details of the primary cannulation technique, number of attempts, time taken, failure and cross-over technique were recorded for three different hemodynamic subsets with Systolic blood pressure <80 mm hg, 80-100 mm hg and > 100 mm hg.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Acute Respiratory Failure Pathologic Processes Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms Shock

Age range

13 year–90 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • All adult Patients worthy of radial artery cannulation, who consented

Exclusion criteria

  • No consent

Treatment and study plan

Radial artery cannulation

Procedure

Radial artery cannulation done with conventional and ultrasound guidance in two respective groups of patients and their first pass success and ultimate success rates compared in different hemodynamic subsets of the patients.

Primary outcomes

  1. First pass success rate

    Time frame: 1 year

    First pass success rate depicted the better method of cannulation of radial artery

  2. Final/ultimate success rate of an intervention

    Time frame: 1 year

    If the primary technique failed then the cannulation was done with the secondary technique and hence the final success rate was calculated for each of the techniques: conventional and ultrasound guided.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time taken for the respective technique

    Time frame: 1 year

    Time taken for each technique was calculated from start of needle insertion till the cannula was completely inserted. The time was compared between the two arms

  2. Attempts of cannulation

    Time frame: 1 year

    Number of attempts made by a technique was recorded and compared

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Sultan Qaboos University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of Conventional and Ultrasound Guided Techniques of Radial Artery Cannulation in Different Hemodynamic Subsets: a Randomized Controlled Study

Acronym: CCURDS

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2016
First posted
Jul 7, 2016
Registry last updated
Jul 11, 2016

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.