Medical Center Leeuwarden MCL
Leeuwarden, 8934AD, Netherlands
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Floor L Reimann, MD
CONTACT
Reinhard Bos, MD PhD
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT04985435
Despite their efficacy in the treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis and their partial advantage over traditional bDMARDs ( biological Disease Modifying antirheumatic drugs), JAK inhibitors (JAKi or tsDMARDs) have not gained preference over Tumor Necrosis Factor inhibitors (TNFi) in guidelines or clinical practice. The biggest influence on recent guidelines has been the "Treat To Target" principle (T2T), in which Shared Decision Making (SDM) plays a key part. Patient preference has proven to be a large barrier in treatment adjustments (14- 37%) while patients showed better adherence and higher treatment satisfaction when engaged in Shared Decision Making. From survey studies it is suggested that patient preference and satisfaction will be in favour of oral JAK inhibitors over parenteral biologics.The investigators want to establish the treatment preference of patients with active RA and compare the treatment satisfaction of patients who are given the opportunity to choose between the JAKi filgotinib and TNFi, to the treatment satisfaction of patients who are randomized to the same treatment options.
In addition to higher treatment satisfaction and better adherence, the investigators expect to find an improvement in DAS28-, HAQ-, SQUASH- and WPAI-scores and also an improved activity and work productivity.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–101 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Leeuwarden, 8934AD, Netherlands
Location status: Recruiting
Floor L Reimann, MD
CONTACT
Reinhard Bos, MD PhD
CONTACT
Rationale: Despite their efficacy in the treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis and their partial advantage over traditional bDMARDs, JAK inhibitors (JAKi or tsDMARDs) have not gained preference over Tumor Necrosis Factor inhibitors (TNFi) in guidelines or clinical practice. The biggest influence on recent guidelines has been the "Treat To Target" principle (T2T), in which Shared Decision Making (SDM) plays a key part. Patient preference has proven to be a large barrier in treatment adjustments (14- 37%) while patients showed better adherence and higher treatment satisfaction when engaged in Shared Decision Making. From survey studies it is suggested that patient preference and satisfaction will be in favour of oral JAK inhibitors over parenteral biologics. The investigators want to establish the treatment preference of patients with active RA and compare the treatment satisfaction of patients who are given the opportunity to choose between the JAKi filgotinib and TNFi, to the treatment satisfaction of patients who are randomized to the same treatment options.
In addition to higher treatment satisfaction and better adherence, the investigators expect to find an improvement in DAS28-, HAQ-, SQUASH- and WPAI-scores and also an improved activity and work productivity.
Objective:
Study design: This study is a multicenter, randomized, 24-week, open label trial
Study population and intervention:
Early, bDMARD naive RA patients, of whom a group of 50 patients will be given the opportunity to choose between either TNFi (etanercept 50 mg SC once a week or adalimumab 40 mg SC once every two weeks) or filgotinib, an oral JAKi, 200 mg once a day while another group of 50 patients will be randomized to the same treatment arms.
Main study parameters/endpoints: The two primary endpoints consist of:
Burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: All medication is prescribed at the indicated dosages used in clinical care, according to international guidelines. Study burden and risks are similar to daily clinical care: In addition to daily clinical care one half of the participants has to make the treatment choice and all participants will fill in questionnaires, which will take about 15 minutes to complete.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Demographic and general characteristics:
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
200 mg tablet once daily or 100 mg once daily
Other names: Jyseleca
Adalimumab subcutaneous injections 40 mg once every two weeks Etanercept subcutaneous injections 50 mg weekly
Other names: Adalimumab (Humira) Etanercept (Enbrel)
50 patients will be given the opportunity to choose between either TNFi (etanercept 50 mg SC once a week or adalimumab 40 mg SC once every two weeks) or filgotinib, an oral JAKi, 200 mg once a day while another group of 50 patients will be randomized to the same treatment arms.
Time frame: Baseline data
The proportion of subjects in the first subgroup choosing filgotinib therapy at baseline
Time frame: 24 weeks
Treatment satisfaction of both subgroups at week 24 at a 5-point Likert scale for current medical treatment: Ranging from 1: very dissatisfied, 2: dissatisfied, 3: neither dissatisfied nor satisfied, 4: satisfied, 5: very satisfied.
Time frame: week 6 and week 24
How patients rate being informed by the neutral information video on a Likert scale of agreement on being well informed, ranging from 1: strongly disagree, 2: disagree, 3: undecided, 4: agree, 5: strongly agree
Time frame: week 6 and week 24
How do patients in the treatment Choice group I rate being in control for their treatment decision.
Time frame: week 24
Proportion of subjects who would choose filgotinib (again or otherwise) at 24-weeks if they were allowed to choose again.
Time frame: baseline data
Proportion of patients who were not able to make a treatment decision.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Floor L Reimann, MD
CONTACT
Reinhard Bos, MD PhD
CONTACT
R.Bos
Other
Better After CHoosing. Randomly Allocated or Patient Preference Based Treatment With Filgotinib or TNFi in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (BACH)
Acronym: BACH
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07207954
Arthritis, Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Melbourne, Australia
View Trial DetailsNCT07295847
Arthritis, Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Tucson, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07137598
Arthritis, Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Peoria, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07620392
Arthritis, Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Tamarac, Florida, United States
View Trial Details