Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07681804

Betamethasone vs Dextrose Injections in Trigger Finger

This study aims to compare the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided betamethasone and dextrose injections in patients with trigger finger.

Trigger finger is a common hand condition characterized by pain, clicking, and locking of the finger due to tendon entrapment at the A1 pulley. Corticosteroid injections are widely used as a first-line treatment; however, they may be associated with potential side effects.

Dextrose injection is an alternative treatment that may promote tissue healing through regenerative mechanisms. However, there is limited high-quality evidence regarding its effectiveness in trigger finger.

In this randomized controlled trial, patients will be assigned to receive either betamethasone or dextrose injection under ultrasound guidance. The primary outcome will be pain intensity measured by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Secondary outcomes will include triggering severity, hand function, grip and pinch strength, and fine motor skills evaluated over a 12-week follow-up period.

The results of this study may help determine whether dextrose injection is a safe and effective alternative to corticosteroid treatment in trigger finger.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine

Istanbul, 34098, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Merve Yıldız, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+905350229993

Merve Yıldız, MD

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

About this study

Trigger finger, also known as stenosing tenosynovitis, is a common hand disorder characterized by pain, catching, and locking of the affected digit due to impaired gliding of the flexor tendon at the A1 pulley. It can significantly impair hand function and quality of life.

Corticosteroid injections are widely accepted as an effective first-line treatment for trigger finger. However, potential adverse effects such as skin atrophy, tendon rupture, and systemic effects, particularly in patients with metabolic disorders, have led to increasing interest in alternative treatment options.

Dextrose injection has emerged as a potential alternative treatment modality in musculoskeletal disorders. However, there is limited high-quality evidence evaluating its effectiveness in trigger finger.

The aim of this prospective, randomized controlled trial is to compare the clinical effectiveness of ultrasound-guided betamethasone injection and dextrose injection in patients with trigger finger.

Eligible participants aged 18 to 75 years with clinically diagnosed trigger finger of at least 4 weeks' duration will be enrolled. Patients will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group will receive an ultrasound-guided injection of 1 ml lidocaine and 1 ml betamethasone, while the other group will receive an ultrasound-guided injection of 1 ml lidocaine and 1 ml 30% dextrose solution (resulting in a final concentration of 15% dextrose). All injections will be performed under sterile conditions at the A1 pulley level.

The study is designed as a randomized, participant-, injector-, and assessor-blinded trial. The injector will be blinded to the injectate using opaque-covered syringes. Randomization will be performed by an independent researcher who will not be involved in outcome assessment.

The primary outcome of the study is the change in pain intensity, assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS).

Secondary outcomes include triggering severity assessed using the Modified Quinnell classification, functional status assessed using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire, grip and pinch strength, and fine motor skills evaluated with the Purdue Pegboard test.

Outcome assessments will be conducted at baseline, 1 hour, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks after injection, according to the predefined schedule of each outcome measure.

This study is expected to provide high-quality evidence regarding the effectiveness of dextrose injection as a potential alternative to corticosteroid treatment in trigger finger.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age between 18 and 75 years
  • Clinical diagnosis of trigger finger
  • Presence of symptoms for at least 4 weeks

Exclusion criteria

  • Previous surgery on the affected finger
  • Injection treatment to the affected finger within the previous 3 months
  • Active local or systemic infection
  • Active malignancy
  • Active inflammatory rheumatic disease (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, polymyalgia rheumatica, vasculitis)
  • Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus and/or uncontrolled hypertension
  • Autoimmune connective tissue diseases (e.g., systemic lupus erythematosus, antiphospholipid syndrome, systemic sclerosis, Sjögren syndrome, polymyositis, dermatomyositis, adult-onset Still's disease)
  • Coagulopathy that increases the risk of injection procedures
  • Pregnancy
  • Known allergy or hypersensitivity to lidocaine, betamethasone, or dextrose
  • Mental impairment or severe psychiatric disorder that may interfere with study participation or informed consent

Treatment and study plan

Betamethasone

Drug

Ultrasound-guided injection of 1 ml lidocaine combined with 1 ml betamethasone administered at the A1 pulley level for the treatment of trigger finger.

Other names: Corticosteroid injection

Dextrose Injection

Other

Ultrasound-guided injection of 1 ml lidocaine combined with 1 ml 30% dextrose solution resulting in a final concentration of 15% dextrose, administered at the A1 pulley level for the treatment of trigger finger.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in pain intensity assessed by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 hour, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks

    Pain intensity will be evaluated using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates worst imaginable pain.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in triggering severity assessed by Modified Quinnell classification

    Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks

    Triggering severity will be evaluated using the Modified Quinnell classification system.

  2. Change in hand function assessed by QuickDASH

    Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks

    Functional status will be assessed using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire.

  3. Change in grip strength

    Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks

    Grip strength will be measured using a hand dynamometer.

  4. Change in pinch strength

    Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks

    Pinch strength will be measured using a pinch meter.

  5. Change in fine motor skills assessed by Purdue Pegboard test

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks

    Fine motor skills and manual dexterity will be evaluated using the Purdue Pegboard test.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Merve Yıldız, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+905350229993

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Betamethasone and Dextrose Injections in the Treatment of Trigger Finger: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Jul 2, 2026
Registry last updated
Jul 28, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.