Berzosertib
DrugGiven IV
Other names: 2-Pyrazinamine, 3-(3-(4-((Methylamino)methyl)phenyl)-5-isoxazolyl)-5-(4-((1-methylethyl)sulfonyl)phenyl)-, M 6620, M6620, VX 970, VX-970, VX970
NCT Number: NCT03641313
This phase II trial studies the how well berzosertib and irinotecan work in treating patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer that is growing, spreading or getting worse (progressive), has spread to other places in the body (metastatic), or cannot be removed by surgery (unresectable). Berzosertib may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for growth. Chemotherapy drugs, such as irinotecan, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Giving berzosertib and irinotecan may work better than irinotecan alone in treating patients with gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, United States
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. Determine objective response rate (ORR) superiority (target 25%) in TP53 mutant patients with progressive metastatic or unresectable gastric/gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer who receive berzosertib (M6620) and irinotecan compared to ORR (5%) in historical control patients treated with single agent irinotecan alone.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Determine duration of response (DOR), time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) superiority in TP53 mutant gastric/GEJ cancer patients who receive M6620 and irinotecan compared to these measures in historical control patients treated with irinotecan alone.
II. Perform the following correlative studies in 9 patients: gamma-H2AX, KAP1 phosphorylated (p)-Ser 824 and p-ATR analysis from biopsies collected at 24 hours (+/- 1 hour) post-irinotecan infusion on cycle 1 day 2 (C1D2) and at 24 hours (+/- 1 hour) post-M6620 on cycle 2 day 2 (C2D2).
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:
I. Determine ORR, DOR, TTP, PFS, and OS in patients with other concomitant damage response defects (DDRD), such as mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, MRE11, RAD50, RAD51, RAD52, RAD54L, NBN, ATM, H2AX, PALB2, RPA, BRIP1, BARD1, ATR, ATRX, CHK1, CHK2, MDM2, MDM4, FANCA, FANCC, FANCD2, FANCE, FANCF, FANCG, FANCL, treated with the experimental combination.
II. Determine whether patients with first line platinum sensitivity (PFS > 3 months) demonstrate improved ORR, DOR, TTP, PFS, and OS compared to patients who were platinum insensitive (PFS < 3 months).
OUTLINE:
Patients receive irinotecan intravenously (IV) over 90 minutes and berzosertib IV over 60 minutes on days 1 and 15. Cycles repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo endoscopic or computed tomography (CT) assisted biopsy and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on study.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up for 30 days and then every 2 months for up to 1 year.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Given IV
Other names: 2-Pyrazinamine, 3-(3-(4-((Methylamino)methyl)phenyl)-5-isoxazolyl)-5-(4-((1-methylethyl)sulfonyl)phenyl)-, M 6620, M6620, VX 970, VX-970, VX970
Undergo CT assisted biopsy
Other names: Computed Tomography Biopsy, Computed Tomography-Guided Needle Biopsy, CT Assisted Biopsy, CT Guided Biopsy
Undergo endoscopic biopsy
Other names: Endoscopy and Biopsy
Given IV
Undergo MRI
Other names: Magnetic Resonance, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Magnetic resonance imaging (procedure), Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scan, Medical Imaging, Magnetic Resonance / Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, MR, MR Imaging, MRI, MRI Scan, MRIs, NMR Imaging, NMRI, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging, sMRI, Structural MRI
Time frame: Up to 1 year
Number of patients that achieved either a partial response or complete response as measured by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 response criteria. Per RECIST v.1.1 assessed by CT or MRI: complete response (CR) is disappearance of all target lesions; partial response (PR) is >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall response (OR) = CR + PR.
Time frame: From when patients achieve their best response (complete response [CR] or partial response [PR]) to when they progress or die for any reason, assessed up to 1 year
As 0 participants achieved a response (either complete response or partial response), data for this outcome measure can not be calculated.
Time frame: From start of treatment to time of progression or death from progression, assessed up to 1 year
Time to progression was calculated for all participants. Progression was defined as: 1) using the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions; and 2) clinical progression as defined by participant's treating physician. This measure was estimated using the method of Kaplan and Meier and presented with 95% confidence intervals.
Time frame: From enrollment to disease progression or death for any reason, assessed up to 1 year
Progression-free survival was calculated for all participants. Progression was defined as: 1) using the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions; and 2) clinical progression as defined by participant's treating physician. This measure was estimated using the method of Kaplan and Meier and presented with 95% confidence intervals.
Time frame: From study enrollment to death for any reason, assessed up to 1 year
Overall survival was calculated for all participants. Will be estimated using the method of Kaplan and Meier and presented with 95% confidence intervals.
Time frame: Up to 1 year
Number of participants that had a partial response or complete response to treatment per RECIST v1.1 categorized by platinum sensitivity. Platinum sensitivity was defined as receiving a prior platinum-based therapy for more than 3 months. Per RECIST v.1.1 assessed by CT or MRI: complete response (CR) is disappearance of all target lesions; partial response (PR) is >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall response (OR) = CR + PR.
Time frame: Up to 1 year
As 0 participants achieved a response (either complete response or partial response), data for this outcome measure can not be calculated.
Time frame: Up to 1 year
Time to progression was calculated for sub cohorts of participants based on sensitivity to prior platinum-based treatment. Progression was defined as: 1) using the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions; and 2) clinical progression as defined by participant's treating physician. This measure was estimated using the method of Kaplan and Meier and presented with 95% confidence intervals.
Time frame: Up to 1 year
Progression-free survival was calculated for sub cohorts of participants based on sensitivity to prior platinum-based treatment. Progression was defined as: 1) using the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions; and 2) clinical progression as defined by participant's treating physician. This measure was estimated using the method of Kaplan and Meier and presented with 95% confidence intervals.
Time frame: Up to 1 year
Overall survival was calculated for sub cohorts of participants based on sensitivity to prior platinum-based treatment
Time frame: Up to 1 year
Mutations present will be summarized as frequency counts and percent of study group.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Nih
A Phase 2 Single-Arm Study of M6620 in Combination With Irinotecan in Patients With Progressive TP53 Mutant Gastric and Gastro-Esophageal Junction Cancer
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05041153
Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma, Advanced Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06203600
Adenocarcinoma Of Esophagus, Advanced Esophageal Adenocarcinoma
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05677490
Adenocarcinoma Of Esophagus, Advanced Esophageal Adenocarcinoma
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05269381
Adenocarcinoma, Anatomic Stage III Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
View Trial Details