University of Virginia, Dept. of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908, United States
NCT Number: NCT03207893
The purpose of this study is to determine if the use of continuous glucose monitoring with the GEM lifestyle modification program (Glycemic load, Exercise and Monitoring glucose) will result in better diabetes control than routine care.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me21 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908, United States
Type 2 diabetes (t2d) is a major epidemic of the developing world which has huge fiscal consequences and many physical complications. It is thought to be brought on in part by contemporary easy access to high energy foods and reduced physical activity, resulting in increased belly fat that culminates in growing insulin resistance and subsequent hyperglycemia. Because of ease and efficacy of medication management, t2d is primarily managed with ever-escalating medication use, which significantly contributes to medical cost and possibly the progression of the disease itself.
An effective supplement or alternative to medication management is lifestyle modification. Conventional lifestyle modification focuses on reducing body fat and insulin resistance through weight reduction from caloric restriction and aerobic exercise. Sustained routine application of this approach is limited because some individuals do not need to lose weight, some do not want to lose weight, others cannot lose weight, and when successful, lifelong weight reduction is difficult to sustain. A useful paradigm shift in lifestyle treatment of t2d might be to go from reducing calories to reducing postprandial glucose (PPG), the primary contributor to glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c).
PPG spikes can be prevented by replacing high with low glycemic load foods and dampened by engaging in postprandial physical activity. This is exemplified by the integrated Glycemic load, Exercise and Monitoring glucose (GEM) program. It promotes choices of low glycemic load foods and increased physical activity, directed by glucose monitoring feedback. Glucose feedback can: 1) educate people as to what food choices minimize PPG and what physical activity choices directly lower PPG, 2) activate individuals when glucose is out of their desired range by alerting them to make choices to lower high glucose or raise low glucose, and 3) motivate individuals to repeat those choices that resulted in desirable glucose consequences. The educating, activating and motivating benefits of glucose feedback are thought to be qualitatively and quantitatively enhanced through continuous glucose monitoring (CGM).
It is hypothesized that, compared to Routine Care (RC), GEM with CGM (GEM+CGM) administered to adults with t2d who are failing with oral medication management will result in better diabetes control (lower HbA1c), reduced medication management (less medication), and better psychological functioning (e.g. greater sense of empowerment) in the short term (3 month follow-up). Further, it is hypothesized that their reduction in HbA1c will be driven by a reduction in PPG.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Four treatment sessions of GEM lifestyle modification in 3 months and continuous glucose monitoring during the first 14 days of each of the 3 months.
Subject's current t2d treatment
Time frame: baseline, 3 months post-intervention
Change in HbA1c measured via blood test
Time frame: baseline, 3 months post-intervention
Changes in prescribed medications (type and/or dosage)
Time frame: baseline, 3 months post-intervention
ASA24 survey across 3 separate days
Time frame: baseline, 3 months post-intervention
At assessment visits, subjects will choose between energy bars that do or dont support the intervention principles.
Time frame: baseline, 3 months post-intervention
daily activity will be recorded
Time frame: baseline, 3 months post-intervention
The Food Questionnaire
Time frame: baseline, 3 months post-intervention
WHOQO-BREF Questionnaire
Time frame: baseline, 3 months post-intervention
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
Time frame: baseline, 3 months post-intervention
Numeracy Scale - measures how good one is with numbers
Time frame: baseline, 3 months post-intervention
Diabetes Knowledge Scale - measures diabetes knowledge
Time frame: baseline, 3 months post-intervention
Diabetes Empowerment Scale
Time frame: baseline, 3 months post-intervention
Problem Area In Diabetes scale (PAID) - measures concerns about diabetes
Time frame: baseline, 3 months post-intervention
The Glucose Monitoring Satisfaction Survey (GMSS)
University of Virginia
Other
Benefits of Adding Continuous Glucose Monitoring to Glycemic Load, Exercise, and Monitoring of Blood Glucose (GEM) for Adults With Type 2 Diabetes - Phase 2
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05259449
Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Puerto Real, Cadiz, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT03899883
Diabetes, Diabetes Complications
Aurora, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07251504
Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Puerto Real, Cádiz, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT00445627
Body Weight, Diabetes Mellitus
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details