Pôle Cardio-Thoracique - Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque - CHU de Bordeaux - Avenue de Magellan
Pessac, 33604, France
NCT Number: NCT00506870
To evaluate the benefit economic and medical of self-monitoring of coagulation compared with conventional follow-up of anticoagulation in a population recently fitted with mechanical heart valves.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Pessac, 33604, France
Rationale/context:
Long term management of anticoagulant treatment is not straightforward, especially in patients bearing mechanical heart valves due to the requirement of maintaining a high INR over a narrow range.
Due to the narrow therapeutic window of AVK, undesirable events (hemorrhages, thromboembolic accidents) tend to be both serious and common leading to frequent admissions to hospital The self-monitoring of AVK, in addition to conventional monitoring of INR in the laboratory, is now being introduced in several countries (USA and Europe).
Main objective To evaluate the benefit economic and medical of self-monitoring of coagulation compared with conventional follow-up of anticoagulation in a population recently fitted with mechanical heart valves.
Secondary objectives
To compare over one year the effect of self-monitoring of coagulation with conventional follow-up of anticoagulation on:
A national, multicenter, randomized, blind trial, designed to examine the type of strategy used for monitoring anticoagulation in two parallel groups:
Inclusion criteria
Treatments/Strategies/Procedures:
1.1. Strategies of anticoagulation monitoring
After signature of informed consent and verification of criteria of eligibility, patients are randomly allocated into the following groups:
1.1.1. Conventional follow-up of anticoagulation In this group, the patients are instructed in the use of oral anticoagulants. INR is measured once a month in the laboratory. INR must lie in the therapeutic range designated by the investigative center as a function of the type and the location of the valve and any associated risk factors. If necessary, the family doctor adjusts INR on the day of the blood test and a new measurement is taken 48 hours later if dosage has been changed.
This algorithm is applied until the INR comes into the designated range.
1.1.2. Self-measurement of anticoagulation In this group, the patients are instructed in the use and monitoring of oral anticoagulants. They are further trained in the use of the self-monitoring test system.
Reference INR will be INR labo during first post operatives weeks up to the return at home because the self-measurement of anticoagulation maybe for lack of the fact of the anaemia, the inflammatory syndrome and the residues of heparin.
When the patients return at home, they take a measurement every week and if the result is abnormal, inform their family doctor. The INR must lie within the therapeutic range designated by the investigative center as a function of the type and the location of the valve and any associated risk factors. If necessary, the family doctor adjusts the INR on the same day as the self-measurement. A measurement is taken 48 hours later if the dosage has been changed.
This algorithm is applied until the INR comes into the designated range. INR is measured in the laboratory every month.
Main evaluation criteria:
Economic and medical evaluation of self-monitoring of coagulation compared with conventional follow-up of anticoagulation in a population recently fitted with mechanical heart valves.
Main secondary evaluation criteria:
Planned population size: 1050 patients, i.e.
Time-line:
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
INR measured by patient himself using INRation or Coaguchek device. And one follow-up of INR per month, measured in laboratory.
Time frame: 12 months
Time frame: 12 months
Time frame: 12 months
Time frame: 12 month
University Hospital, Bordeaux
Other
Economic and Medical Evaluation of Self-monitoring of Anticoagulation in a Population of Patients Recently Fitted With a Mechanical Heart Valve Compared to Conventional Anticoagulation Follow-up
Acronym: 4A
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.