Ulm University
Ulm, 89075, Germany
NCT Number: NCT04756219
There is growing evidence that negative attitudes towards persons affected by suicide (i.e. persons who experience suicidality, persons who lost a loved one to suicide), so called public suicide stigma, is harmful for suicide prevention, for example by reducing social support, inhibiting help-seeking for suicidality and increasing distress as well as suicidality among stigmatized persons. Reducing public suicide stigma could therefore be an important factor of successful suicide prevention. However, reducing public suicide stigma could also be harmful, for example by increasing attitudes that suicidal behaviour is a normal and acceptable solution for crisis situations, which could decrease help-seeking for suicidality and encourage suicidal behaviour. This project will (1) develop four interventions (contact-based vs. education based, video vs. text) hypothesized to reduce public suicide stigma, (2) determine the efficacy of the four interventions with regard to reducing public suicide stigma, (3) identify additional harmful (e.g. normalization of suicidal behaviour) and beneficial intervention effects (e.g. improved attitudes to seek help) and (4) investigate pathways explaining intervention effects.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Ulm, 89075, Germany
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Participants need to be at least 18 years old, speak German and provide online informed consent.
Exclusion criteria
Persons who self-report to have experienced suicidality within three months before baseline will be excluded.
No additional information necessary.
No additional information necessary.
No additional information necessary.
No additional information necessary.
Time frame: Immediately after the intervention (t1)
Batterham al. (2013) The Stigma of Suicide Scale. Psychometric properties and correlates of the stigma of suicide. Crisis 34(1):13-21
Time frame: Two weeks after the intervention (t2)
Batterham al. (2013) The Stigma of Suicide Scale. Psychometric properties and correlates of the stigma of suicide. Crisis 34(1):13-21
Time frame: Immediately after the intervention (t1); Two weeks after the intervention (t2)
Batterham et al. (2013) Correlates of suicide stigma and suicide literacy in the community. Suicide Life Threat Behav 43(4):406-417
Time frame: Immediately after the intervention (t1); Two weeks after the intervention (t2)
Cwik et al. (2017) Measuring attitudes towards suicide: Preliminary evaluation of an attitude towards suicide scale. Compr Psychiatry 72:56-65
Time frame: Immediately after the intervention (t1); Two weeks after the intervention (t2)
Wilson et al. (2005) Measuring help-seeking intentions: Properties of the General Help-Seeking Questionnaire. Canadian Journal of Counselling 39(1):15-28
Time frame: Immediately after the intervention (t1); Two weeks after the intervention (t2)
One item adapted from the PHQ-9 (Kroenke et al. 2001; "Do you currently experience thoughts that you would be better off dead or of hurting yourself?" response scale from 1 (not at all) to 7 (very much)
Time frame: Immediately after the intervention (t1); Two weeks after the intervention (t2)
Breyer & Bluemke (2016) Deutsche Version der Positive and Negative Affect Schedule PANAS (GESIS Panel). ZIS - GESIS Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences
Time frame: Two weeks after the intervention (t2)
Löwe et al. (2005) Detecting and monitoring depression with a two-item questionnaire (PHQ-2). Journal of Psychosomatic Research 58(2):163-171
University of Ulm
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06759129
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Valencia, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT05272176
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05657119
Accidental Injuries, Behavior
Kotzebue, Alaska, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05275101
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Columbus, Ohio, United States
View Trial Details