Rituximab
BiologicalGiven IV
Other names: IDEC-C2B8, Chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, Rituxan
NCT Number: NCT01216683
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as bendamustine hydrochloride, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Monoclonal antibodies, such as rituximab, can block cancer growth in different ways. Some block the ability of cancer cells to grow and spread. Others find cancer cells and help kill them or carry cancer-killing substances to them. Bortezomib may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Biological therapies, such as lenalidomide, may stimulate the immune system in different ways and stop cancer cells from growing. It is not yet known whether giving bendamustine hydrochloride and rituximab together alone is more effective than giving bendamustine hydrochloride and rituximab together with bortezomib or lenalidomide in treating follicular lymphoma.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying giving bendamustine hydrochloride and rituximab together with or without bortezomib followed by rituximab with or without lenalidomide to see how well they work in treating patients with high-risk stage II, stage III, or stage IV follicular lymphoma.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Marin Cancer Care Inc, Greenbrae, California, United States
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
Secondary
OUTLINE: Patients are stratified according to FLIPI-1score (0-2 vs 3 vs 4-5) and Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes Folliculaires (GELF) tumor burden (low vs high). Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms.
Quality of life (including fatigue, neurotoxicity, anxiety, and depression) is assessed by questionnaire at baseline and periodically during study therapy.
Blood, bone marrow, and tissue samples may be collected periodically for correlative studies and for a repository.
After completion of study therapy, patients are followed up periodically for 15 years.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
(Induction):
Exclusion criteria
(Induction):
Inclusion criteria
(Continuation):
Exclusion criteria
(Continuation):
Given IV
Other names: IDEC-C2B8, Chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, Rituxan
Given IV
Other names: Bendamustine hydrochloride, CEP-18083, TREANDA
Given IV
Other names: MLN341, LDP-341, Velcade®, PS-341
Given orally
Other names: IMiD compound CC-5013, Revlimid®
Time frame: Assessed every 4 weeks during induction treatment and every 8 weeks during continuation treatment, up to 2 years
Complete remission is defined as complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy.
This analysis was conducted among 222 evaluable patients for the primary analysis. The purpose of this analysis is to compare the complete remission rate of rituximab + bendamustine vs. bortezomib + rituximab + bendamustine as induction therapy, therefore, the proportion of patients with complete remission was compared between Arm B (bortezomib + rituximab + bendamustine) and Arms A and C combined (rituximab + bendamustine).
Time frame: Assessed at 1 year post-induction, approximately 1.5 years
1-year post induction disease-free survival rate is defined as the proportion of patients achieving complete remission during induction treatment and are alive and maintaining complete remission at 1 year after induction completion.
The purpose of this analysis is to compare the 1-year post-induction disease-free survival (DFS) rate with rituximab plus lenalidomide to rituximab alone as continuation therapy following induction treatment of bendamustine+rituximab, therefore, patients with induction treatment of bendamustine + rituximab + bortezomib were not included in this analysis.
Time frame: Assessed every cycle during treatment and every 6 months between 2 and 5 years from study entry
Progression-free survival is defined as the time from registration of induction treatment to progression, relapse or death, whichever occurs first. Patients alive without documented progression are censored at last disease assessment. 3-year progression-free survival rate is the proportion of patients who were progression-free and alive at 3 years estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier.
Progression/relapse is defined as appearance of any new lesion more than 1.5 cm in any axis during or at the end of therapy, >=50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously involved nodes or extranodal masses or the size of other lesions, or >=50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node or extranodal mass more than 1 cm in its short axis.
Time frame: Assessed every cycle during treatment and every 6 months between 2 and 5 years from study entry
Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to death or date last known alive. 5-year overall survival rate is the proportion of patients who were alive at 5 years estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier.
Time frame: Assessed every 4 weeks during induction treatment and every 8 weeks during continuation treatment, up to 2 years
Complete remission is defined as complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy.
This analysis was conducted among 222 evaluable patients. The proportion of patients with complete remission was compared between patients with Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) of 3-5 and patients with FLIPI of 0-2/unknown.
The FLIPI was developed in order to predict prognosis of patients with newly diagnosed follicular lymphoma (FL). The five FLIPI risk factors were: age > 60 years, Ann Arbor stage III-IV, hemoglobin level < 12 gm/dL, >4 nodal areas, and serum LDH level above normal. The FLIPI score was calculated by summing the number of risk factors. The higher the FLIPI score, the worse the prognosis.
Time frame: Assessed at 1 year post-induction, approximately 1.5 years
1-year post induction disease-free survival rate is defined as the proportion of patients achieving complete remission during induction treatment and are alive and maintaining complete remission at 1 year after induction completion.
This analysis was conducted among 203 evaluable patients in the continuation treatment portion of the study. The 1-year post induction disease-free survival rate was compared between patients with FLIPI of 3-5 and patients with FLIPI of 0-2/unknown.
The FLIPI was developed in order to predict prognosis of patients with newly diagnosed follicular lymphoma (FL). The five FLIPI risk factors were: age > 60 years, Ann Arbor stage III-IV, hemoglobin level < 12 gm/dL, >4 nodal areas, and serum LDH level above normal. The FLIPI score was calculated by summing the number of risk factors. The higher the FLIPI score, the worse the prognosis.
Time frame: Assessed every cycle during treatment and every 6 months between 2 and 5 years from study entry
Progression-free survival is defined as the time from registration of induction treatment to progression, relapse or death, whichever occurs first. Patients alive without documented progression are censored at last disease assessment. Progression/relapse is defined as appearance of any new lesion more than 1.5 cm in any axis during or at the end of therapy, >=50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously involved nodes or extranodal masses or the size of other lesions, or >=50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node or extranodal mass more than 1 cm in its short axis.
The five FLIPI risk factors were: age > 60 years, Ann Arbor stage III-IV, hemoglobin level < 12 gm/dL, >4 nodal areas, and serum LDH level above normal. The FLIPI score was calculated by summing the number of risk factors. The higher the FLIPI score, the worse the prognosis.
Time frame: Assessed every cycle during treatment and every 6 months between 2 and 5 years from study entry
Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to death or date last known alive. 5-year overall survival rate is the proportion of patients who were alive at 5 years estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier.
The FLIPI was developed in order to predict prognosis of patients with newly diagnosed follicular lymphoma (FL). The five FLIPI risk factors were: age > 60 years, Ann Arbor stage III-IV, hemoglobin level < 12 gm/dL, >4 nodal areas, and serum LDH level above normal. The FLIPI score was calculated by summing the number of risk factors. The higher the FLIPI score, the worse the prognosis.
Time frame: Assessed every 4 weeks during induction treatment and every 8 weeks during continuation treatment, up to 2 years
Complete remission is defined as complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy.
This analysis was conducted among 250 evaluable patients with Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) data available. The proportion of patients with complete remission was compared between patients with CIRS <10 and patients with CIRS >=10. Higher CIRS scores indicate higher severity with max score of 56 points.
Time frame: Assessed at 1 year post-induction, approximately 1.5 years
1-year post induction disease-free survival rate is defined as the proportion of patients achieving complete remission during induction treatment and are alive and maintaining complete remission at 1 year after induction completion.
This analysis was conducted among 250 evaluable patients with Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) data available. The proportion of patients disease-free and alive at 1 year post induction treatment was compared between patients with CIRS <10 and patients with CIRS >=10. Higher CIRS scores indicate higher severity with max score of 56 points.
Time frame: Assessed every cycle during treatment and every 6 months between 2 and 5 years from study entry
Progression-free survival is defined as the time from registration of induction treatment to progression, relapse or death, whichever occurs first. Patients alive without documented progression are censored at last disease assessment. 3-year progression-free survival rate is the proportion of patients who were progression-free and alive at 3 years estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier.
Progression/relapse is defined as appearance of any new lesion more than 1.5 cm in any axis during or at the end of therapy, >=50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously involved nodes or extranodal masses or the size of other lesions, or >=50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node or extranodal mass more than 1 cm in its short axis.
The 3-year progression-free survival rate is reported by Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) score (<10 vs. >=10). Higher CIRS scores indicate higher severity with max score of 56 points.
Time frame: Assessed every cycle during treatment and every 6 months between 2 and 5 years from study entry
Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to death or date last known alive. 5-year overall survival rate is the proportion of patients who were alive at 5 years estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier.
The 5-year overall survival rate is reported by Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) score (<10 vs. >=10). Higher CIRS scores indicate higher severity with max score of 56 points.
Time frame: Assessed every cycle during treatment and for 30 days after discontinuation of treatment, up to 15 years
Peripheral neuropathy was assessed using NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. Proportion of patients with grade 3 or higher peripheral neuropathy was compared between patients with subcutaneous bortezomib and patients with intravenous bortezomib.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) is a 27-item questionnaire that has four areas of measurements (physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being and functional well-being) with a scale of 0-4. The FACT-G total score ranges between 0 and 108. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
Time frame: Assessed at cycle 3 or cycle 4, approximately 3 or 4 months
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) is a 27-item questionnaire that has four areas of measurements (physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being and functional well-being) with a scale of 0-4. The FACT-G total score ranges between 0 and 108. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
FACT-G total score at cycle 3 is considered as mid-treatment score. If FACT-G total score at cycle 3 is not available, the score at cycle 4 will be used as the mid-treatment score.
Time frame: Assessed at cycle 6, approximately 6 months
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) is a 27-item questionnaire that has four areas of measurements (physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being and functional well-being) with a scale of 0-4. The FACT-G total score ranges between 0 and 108. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) is a 15-item questionnaire that evaluates disease-related symptoms and concerns specific to lymphoma with a scale of 0-4. The FACT-Lym subscale score ranges between 0 and 60. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
Time frame: Assessed at cycle 3 or cycle 4, approximately 3 or 4 months
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) is a 15-item questionnaire that evaluates disease-related symptoms and concerns specific to lymphoma with a scale of 0-4. The FACT-Lym subscale score ranges between 0 and 60. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
FACT-Lym subscale score at cycle 3 is considered as mid-treatment score. If FACT-Lym subscale score at cycle 3 is not available, the score at cycle 4 will be used as the mid-treatment score.
Time frame: Assessed at cycle 6, approximately 6 months
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) is a 15-item questionnaire that evaluates disease-related symptoms and concerns specific to lymphoma with a scale of 0-4. The FACT-Lym subscale score ranges between 0 and 60. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline
The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) is comprised of 13 items that assess fatigue and its impact with a scale of 0-4. The FACIT-Fatigue subscale score ranges between 0 and 52. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
Time frame: Assessed at cycle 3 or cycle 4, approximately 3 or 4 months
The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) is comprised of 13 items that assess fatigue and its impact with a scale of 0-4. The FACIT-Fatigue subscale score ranges between 0 and 52. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
FACIT-Fatigue subscale score at cycle 3 is considered as mid-treatment score. If FACIT-Fatigue subscale score at cycle 3 is not available, the score at cycle 4 will be used as the mid-treatment score.
Time frame: Assessed at cycle 6, approximately 6 months
The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) is comprised of 13 items that assess fatigue and its impact with a scale of 0-4. The FACIT-Fatigue subscale score ranges between 0 and 52. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group - Neurotoxicity (FACT-GOG-NTX) subscale is comprised of 11 items that assess neurotoxicity with a scale of 0-4. The FACT-GOG-NTX subscale score ranges between 0 and 44. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
Time frame: Assessed at cycle 3, approximately 3 months
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group - Neurotoxicity (FACT-GOG-NTX) subscale is comprised of 11 items that assess neurotoxicity with a scale of 0-4. The FACT-GOG-NTX subscale score ranges between 0 and 44. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
Time frame: Assessed at end of induction treatment (cycle 6), approximately 6 months
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group - Neurotoxicity (FACT-GOG-NTX) subscale is comprised of 11 items that assess neurotoxicity with a scale of 0-4. The FACT-GOG-NTX subscale score ranges between 0 and 44. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group
Network
A 3-Arm Randomized Phase II Trial of Bendamustine-Rituximab (BR) Followed by Rituximab vs Bortezomib-BR (BVR) Followed by Rituximab vs BR Followed by Lenalidomide/Rituximab in High Risk Follicular Lymphoma
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00641381
Burkitt Lymphoma, DNA Virus Infections
Duarte, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00428142
Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases, Immune System Diseases
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT00006721
Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases, Immune System Diseases
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00278408
Burkitt Lymphoma, DNA Virus Infections
Copenhagen, Denmark
View Trial Details