University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106, United States
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT06754046
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if retropubic midurethral sling (RP-MUS) or bulkamide injection (PAHG) at the time of pelvic organ prolapse repair is better from the patient's perspective. The main questions it aims to answer are:
What is the average difference in the urogenital distress inventory (UDI) long form score 24 months after surgery for each procedure? Which procedure has the fewest complications and lowest short- and long-term morbidity profile?
Participants will:
Be blinded and randomized to one of two procedures for the duration of the study, 24 months.
Complete 6 total visits for the clinical trial including validated questionnaires.
Few participants will be selected to complete a qualitative interview at 3 timepoints over 24 month duration of the study.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106, United States
Location status: Recruiting
This will be a double-blinded, non-inferiority, controlled trial utilizing a 1:1 randomization scheme to assign patients to each treatment arm (PAHG vs. RP-MUS). Patients undergoing PAHG will be given sham incisions in order to mask the type of SUI procedure they underwent. This will consist of two "earring-hole" sized superficial scratches in the epidermis and fibrin glue applied to the expected suprapubic exit sites for the RP-MUS. Sham incisions are not associated with an increased risk of infection and are considered low risk. Validated symptom questionnaires will be administered to the patient by a study investigator prior to surgery and at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months. At the final study visit, patients will be un-blinded and provided information on which SUI procedure they underwent. Unless it is necessary for subsequent care, as in the case of a procedure specific complication like a mesh erosion, patients who might require additional intervention for recurrent SUI during the study period will remain blinded to their initial treatment assignment. If patients request this information, they will be informed that they would need to exit the study, however their data would still be analyzed as part of the intention to treat protocol. Data of patients who dropout will be analyzed in the same manner. Pelvic organ prolapse procedures will be limited to native tissue repairs only and may include either or both apical and non-apical repair procedures; selection of appropriate POP repair procedure will be at the surgeon's discretion. All randomized patients will complete surveys at 12 and 24 months will assess patient recovery, satisfaction with care, and calibrating surveyed and clinically assessed outcomes to their daily life experiences. Based on prior similar studies, this number is sufficient to ensure saturation of themes83. Between 8 to 20 participants in each arm will be randomly selected from across all sites to participate in individual semi-structured telephone interviews preoperatively, at 12 months and at 24 months after surgery.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
a standard urethral sling placement for treatment of stress urinary incontinence
A standard 2 mL dose injection of bulkamid (order and number will be at the discretion of the surgeon) will be given. Patients undergoing PAHG will be given sham incisions consisting of superficial suprapubic epidermal scratches with a needle and fibrin glue at expected sling exit sites.
Time frame: 24 months postoperatively
a questionnaire used to assess the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms like incontinence, particularly in women, by measuring the impact of these symptoms on their quality of life. Scores range from 0 to 100, higher number indicates worse symptoms.
Time frame: 1, 6 and 12 months postoperatively
a questionnaire used to assess the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms like incontinence, particularly in women, by measuring the impact of these symptoms on their quality of life. Scores range from 0 to 100, higher number indicates worse symptoms.
Time frame: 1 month, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months postoperatively
Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) score is a rating on a scale from 1 to 7 that measures a patient's perception of how their condition has changed in response to treatment
Time frame: up to 24 months post operatively
Time frame: preoperatively, 1, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively
A patient-centric questionnaire developed to provide a comprehensive assessment of lower urinary tract symptoms including symptoms of overactive bladder and voiding dysfunction. Scoring ranges from 0 (least severe) to 100 (most severe).
Time frame: preoperatively, 1, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively
This 19 item questionnaire will assess sexual function and body image. It has a scoring range from 2 to 36 with higher scores indicating better sexual functioning.
Time frame: Up 24 months postoperatively
Perioperative morbidity will be assessed using the Clavien-Dindo classification. The classification is a system for grading the severity of postoperative complications based on the level of intervention required to treat them. The CD classification uses five grades of severity, with Grade I being low and Grade V being death.
Time frame: preoperatively, 1, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively
Recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse is assessed utilizing the POP-Q system classifies pelvic organ prolapse into four stages. It ranges from Stage I (most distal part of the prolapse is more than 1 cm above the hymen) to Stage IV (Complete procidentia or vault eversion)
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Other
BELIEVE Trial: Bulking vErsus sLing for Treating Stress Urinary IncontinEnce at the Time of Vaginal prolapsE Repair
Acronym: BELIEVE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06416982
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06161506
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04133675
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Royal Oak, Michigan, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04829175
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
View Trial Details