Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05948722

Behavioral Intervention Program Based on Motivational Interview

The best way for dental professionals act using dialogue methods and individual approaches in daily clinical practice to change behavioral is still inconclusive. Thus, the objective will be evaluate the effect of using motivational interviewing as part of the treatment of periodontitis in order to increase the adherence of adults to adequate oral health behavior.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Carlos Heitor Moreira

Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, 97015-900, Brazil

About this study

Patient-related approaches may show better results in treatment of periodontal diseases. The best way for the dental surgeon to act using these methods is still inconclusive. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of using motivational interviewing as part of the treatment of periodontitis in order to increase adult adherence to adequate oral health behavior. A randomized clinical trial, with a sample size of at least 72 subjects, >18 years of age and with at least 18 teeth, will be investigated. Individuals in the test group will receive a collaborative communicative approach, inspired by the motivational interview, while the control group will receive the information/instructions in a conventional approach. The efficacy variables for evaluating the pattern of self-control of periodontal infection will be the bleeding on probing (BoP), gingival index (GI, primary efficacy variable), the plaque index (PI) and patient-based outcomes will be assessed using quality of life questionnaires. Additionally, questionnaires will be applied to obtain sociodemographic, behavioral and self-perception of oral health data. Univariate and multivariate analyzes will be performed and conducted in the Statistical Products Service Solutions software (SPSS, version 25). Thus, it will be possible to assess whether brief oral health education interventions centered on the individual can be used by dental surgeons in order to effectively improve oral hygiene behaviors in adults, obtaining better clinical results and a better quality of life for patients.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults, over 18-year-old;
  • BoP (Bleeding on probing) in at least 30% of sites;
  • Diagnosed periodontitis.

Exclusion criteria

  • Smoking;
  • Diabetes;
  • Pregnancy (or the planning of pregnancy);
  • Immunosuppressive illness or a medication, hepatitis, HIV, a bleeding illness or a anticoagulant;
  • A need for the antibiotic prophylaxis;
  • Hyposalivation or use of medications that cause hyposalivation

Treatment and study plan

Motivational Interview Group (MIG)

Behavioral

Brief MI intervention with the conventional treatment

Conventional treatment group (CTG)

Procedure

Conventional treatment

Primary outcomes

  1. The change in Bleeding on Probing to evaluate the improvement in hygiene behavior

    Time frame: baseline, 15 days after supragingival treatment, 30 and 60 days after subgingival treatment and through study completion, an average of 1 year

    BoP - Dichotomic response after probing the gingival sulcus. High values mean worst condition.

  2. The change in Plaque Index to evaluate the improvement in hygiene behavior

    Time frame: baseline, 15 days after supragingival treatment, 30 and 60 days after subgingival treatment and through study completion, an average of 1 year

    PI - Each of the 6 sites of the tooth is given a score from 0 to 3. High values mean worst condition.

  3. The change in Gingival index to evaluate the improvement in hygiene behavior

    Time frame: baseline, 15 days after supragingival treatment, 30 and 60 days after subgingival treatment and through study completion, an average of 1 year

    GI - Each of the 6 sites of the tooth is given a score from 0 to 3. High values mean worst condition.

  4. Patient satisfaction assessed by the change in Quality of Life questionnaire

    Time frame: baseline, 60 days after subgingival treatment and through study completion, an average of 1 year

    Quality of life - % of patients with better scores (lowest values) of quality of life. It can vary from 0 to 56.

  5. Patient perception assessed by the change in autoperception of oral health questionnaire

    Time frame: baseline, 60 days after subgingival treatment and through study completion, an average of 1 year

    Autoperception of oral health - rate of patients with better condition of oral health perception. The answer options are: Great; Good; Regular; Bad; Terrible. 0-4 (lower scores mean better self-perception).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Oral hygiene-related self-efficacy assessed by the oral hygiene-related selfefficacy (OHSE) questionnaire

    Time frame: 60 days after subgingival treatment and six months later

    Oral hygiene-related self-efficacy: % of patients with higher scores of self-efficacy. It ranges from 19 to 76, higher scores mean better self-efficacy.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Universidade Federal de Santa Maria

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Behavioral Intervention Program Based on Motivational Interview to Improve Oral Hygiene in Adults - a Randomized Clinical Trial

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2025
First posted
Jul 17, 2023
Registry last updated
Mar 27, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.