NCT Number: NCT02634879
Behavioral Economics in Provider Incentive Design
The shift towards value-based reimbursement in U.S. healthcare is accelerating. Payment reform initiatives have taken many shapes-accountable care organizations, bundled payments, value-based purchasing, medical homes, global payment-but all share the common strategy of tying provider (physician, hospital, health system) reimbursement to performance on costs, outcomes, or both. Yet, pay-for-performance has demonstrated little effect on physician behavior and patient outcomes. Payers and provider groups are in need of novel approaches to structure provider incentives-both financial and non-financial-to better promote the delivery of quality, cost-effective care. In this project, the study team plans to study how behavioral economic principles can improve the effectiveness of physician incentives to deliver higher quality and lower cost care. They will test the application of specific behavioral economic principles including immediacy, social pressure, and loss aversion in incentive design and implementation. The study will contribute to an empirical foundation for re-design of existing physician incentive programs and implementation of new policies through secondary data analyses and a multi-arm experiment that evaluate the impact of promising behavioral economics principles on the effectiveness of provider financial and nonfinancial incentives.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
18 year and older
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Not applicable
About this study
The key goal of this project is to demonstrate how using behavioral economic principles to inform the structure of provider incentives and the practice environment can improve provider performance, especially in settings that are moving away from fee-for-service reimbursement and fragmented care towards new payment and delivery models that emphasize coordination of care and provider accountability. The project will build upon the recently completed 'Phase 1' project in which a set of behavioral economic approaches to provider performance were identified that could meaningfully improve provider performance, a focused research agenda of high-priority tests of these concepts (i.e., content of this proposal) was developed; and information on how behavioral economics can be used to improve incentives for physicians was disseminated. For this phase, an experimental evaluation will be conducted of the impact of social pressure by varying individual and group incentives and the comparative effectiveness of two loss aversion framing methods (endowment versus performance gap) on provider performance via a multi-arm experiment. We will complement the quantitative evaluations with pre- and post-intervention qualitative surveys of physicians and patients to better understand the influence on behavior change, culture, acceptability of the incentive program, and patient reported outcomes on health and experience.
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- Physician at participating provider organization (PCP and specific specialties)
Exclusion criteria
- N/A
Treatment and study plan
Primary outcomes
-
Physician performance
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
Measured by physician-level CI composite quality measure score
Secondary outcomes
-
Physician Practice Behavior
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
Evaluate how practice behavior changes by looking at pre and post survey data.
-
Physician Incentive Payouts
Time frame: Throughout the 12 months
How much incentives the physicians receive throughout the project.
-
Patient satisfaction
Time frame: 6 months to 12 months
Patients will be surveyed to assess their satisfaction with their physician throughout the project period.
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
University of Pennsylvania
Other
Registry information
Important dates
- Study start
- 2016
- Primary completion
- 2017
- Study completion
- 2017
- First posted
- Dec 18, 2015
- Registry last updated
- Dec 12, 2018
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
Genetics of Type 2 Diabetes in West Africans
NCT00837122
Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes
Accra, Ghana
View Trial DetailsUric Acid Lowering Trial in Youth Onset T2D
NCT03899883
Diabetes, Diabetes Complications
Aurora, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsInvestigating the Use of Quercetin on Glucose Absorption in Obesity, and Obesity With Type 2 Diabetes
NCT00065676
Body Weight, Diabetes
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsVitamin E Pharmacokinetics and Biomarkers in Normal and Obese Women
NCT00862433
Body Weight, Diabetes
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details