Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02634879

Behavioral Economics in Provider Incentive Design

The shift towards value-based reimbursement in U.S. healthcare is accelerating. Payment reform initiatives have taken many shapes-accountable care organizations, bundled payments, value-based purchasing, medical homes, global payment-but all share the common strategy of tying provider (physician, hospital, health system) reimbursement to performance on costs, outcomes, or both. Yet, pay-for-performance has demonstrated little effect on physician behavior and patient outcomes. Payers and provider groups are in need of novel approaches to structure provider incentives-both financial and non-financial-to better promote the delivery of quality, cost-effective care. In this project, the study team plans to study how behavioral economic principles can improve the effectiveness of physician incentives to deliver higher quality and lower cost care. They will test the application of specific behavioral economic principles including immediacy, social pressure, and loss aversion in incentive design and implementation. The study will contribute to an empirical foundation for re-design of existing physician incentive programs and implementation of new policies through secondary data analyses and a multi-arm experiment that evaluate the impact of promising behavioral economics principles on the effectiveness of provider financial and nonfinancial incentives.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

About this study

The key goal of this project is to demonstrate how using behavioral economic principles to inform the structure of provider incentives and the practice environment can improve provider performance, especially in settings that are moving away from fee-for-service reimbursement and fragmented care towards new payment and delivery models that emphasize coordination of care and provider accountability. The project will build upon the recently completed 'Phase 1' project in which a set of behavioral economic approaches to provider performance were identified that could meaningfully improve provider performance, a focused research agenda of high-priority tests of these concepts (i.e., content of this proposal) was developed; and information on how behavioral economics can be used to improve incentives for physicians was disseminated. For this phase, an experimental evaluation will be conducted of the impact of social pressure by varying individual and group incentives and the comparative effectiveness of two loss aversion framing methods (endowment versus performance gap) on provider performance via a multi-arm experiment. We will complement the quantitative evaluations with pre- and post-intervention qualitative surveys of physicians and patients to better understand the influence on behavior change, culture, acceptability of the incentive program, and patient reported outcomes on health and experience.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Physician at participating provider organization (PCP and specific specialties)

Exclusion criteria

  • N/A

Treatment and study plan

Incentive Change

Behavioral

Primary outcomes

  1. Physician performance

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

    Measured by physician-level CI composite quality measure score

Secondary outcomes

  1. Physician Practice Behavior

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

    Evaluate how practice behavior changes by looking at pre and post survey data.

  2. Physician Incentive Payouts

    Time frame: Throughout the 12 months

    How much incentives the physicians receive throughout the project.

  3. Patient satisfaction

    Time frame: 6 months to 12 months

    Patients will be surveyed to assess their satisfaction with their physician throughout the project period.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Pennsylvania

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2017
First posted
Dec 18, 2015
Registry last updated
Dec 12, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.