Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Buffalo, New York, 14263, United States
NCT Number: NCT04548193
This phase I trial investigates how well a healthy eating program works in improving outcomes in patients with bladder cancer. The behavioral dietary program consists of educational materials, live phone calls, and interactive voice response phone messages. Participating in the healthy eating program may improve eating habits and/or reduce the risk of bladder cancer from coming back.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1
Buffalo, New York, 14263, United States
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Develop an evidence-based behavioral intervention to increase cruciferous vegetable intake, with the goal of attaining desirable urinary isothiocyanates (ITC) levels effective for anti-cancer activities.
II. Conduct a feasibility pilot of our dietary behavioral intervention through a hybrid I implementation randomized controlled design in 80 non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) survivors, where the treatment group (n=40) will receive an evidence-based telephone intervention to increase cruciferous vegetable intake and the control group (n=40) will receive a general fruit and vegetable intake intervention based on National Cancer Institute (NCI) guidelines.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To ascertain the level of gene expression changes in urinary exfoliated epithelial cells (due to the intervention) as a surrogate for intermediate efficacy.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVE:
I. Engage the clinical care providers of patients enrolled in our intervention to ascertain the barriers and facilitators of intervention implementation within clinical practice through conducting 20 semi-structured interviews.
OUTLINE:
AIM I: Develop an evidence-based behavioral intervention using a systematic process consisting of information gathering, discussion groups, and mock intervention delivery.
AIM II: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM A (HEALTHY EATING PROGRAM A): Patients receive mailed educational materials about the importance of consuming cruciferae, setting healthier eating goals, and the importance of keeping track of what they eat. Patients also receive one phone call from study staff to make sure they understood the educational materials received and 11 interactive voice response (IVR) phone messages over 6 months.
ARM B (HEALTHY EATING PROGRAM B): Patients receive mailed educational materials about general fruit and vegetable intake, setting healthier eating goals, and the importance of keeping track of what they eat. Patients also receive one phone call from study staff to make sure they understood the educational materials received and 11 IVR phone messages over 6 months.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Receive live phone call
Receive educational materials
Other names: Education for Intervention, Intervention by Education, Intervention through Education, Intervention, Educational
Ancillary studies
Time frame: 6 months
Will be measured using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-based cyclocondensation assay. The outcome is defined as change from baseline in measured levels. Between-group difference of change from baseline was analyzed using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests.
Time frame: 6 months
Will be assessed using a questionnaire adapted from Thomson et al. to capture both intake and cooking styles. The outcome is defined as change from baseline in measured levels. Between-group difference of change from baseline was analyzed using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests.
Time frame: 6 months
Will be evaluated via ribonucleic acid-sequencing (RNA-seq) as a surrogate for intermediate efficacy, conducted at Roswell Park's Genomics Shared Resource using NextSeq500 platform (Illumina Inc.). Will summarize changes between pre- and post-intervention for both arms and calculate point estimates and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Will analyze between-group differences in the change of outcome variables between baseline and post-intervention using ANCOVA.
Time frame: 6 months
Will be evaluated by three non-consecutive 24-hour dietary recalls (two weekdays, one weekday) conducted by trained staff using the interview-administered Nutrition Data System for Research (NDSR). The outcome is defined as change from baseline in measured levels. Between-group difference of change from baseline was analyzed using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests.
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Other
POW-R Health: Power to Redefine Your Health A Pragmatic Dietary Intervention to Improve Bladder Cancer Survivorship
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04501913
Adenocarcinoma, Adnexal Diseases
Duarte, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04496219
Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma in Situ, Female Urogenital Diseases
Seattle, Washington, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05843448
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Sacramento, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07302230
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Seattle, Washington, United States
View Trial Details