Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06584864

Bedside Ultrasound on the Effectiveness of Lumbar Puncture in Children.

The aim of the study is to assess the influence of ultrasound examination of the lumbar spinal canal on the effectiveness of lumbar puncture. An open-label, randomized interventional study.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

Up to 18 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Medcial Univeristy of Warsaw

Warsaw, 02-091, Poland

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Agata - Ćwiek, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

22-317-95-37

Agata Ćwiek, MD

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Maciej - Kołodziej, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

22-317-95-37

Maciej Kołodziej, MD

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

About this study

Lumbar puncture is a common procedure performed in pediatric departments. The most common purpose of the examination in the pediatric patient population is to exclude infectious diseases of the central nervous system: meningitis and encephalitis. Risk factors for traumatic or unsuccessful puncture include, among others: patient age less than 3 months, difficulty in identifying anatomical structures by palpation, lack of local anesthesia, lack of experience of the person performing the procedure, and patient movement during puncture. The use of spinal canal ultrasonography before performing lumbar puncture brings promising benefits. Ultrasound imaging can be helpful in visualizing key anatomical structures within the spinal canal and increasing the certainty of correct performance of the procedure, especially in inexperienced physicians.

The study objective is to assess the effect of ultrasound imaging of the lumbar spinal canal on the effectiveness of lumbar puncture.

We plan to include every child <18 years old with an indication for lumbar puncture to the one of the two groups (ultrasound group and standard group)

Before the procedure, doctors performing the lumbar puncture in both groups will complete a questionnaire regarding their previous experience In the USG group, before performing the lumbar puncture, one of the two researchers will perform a bedside ultrasound examination of the lumbar spinal canal.

The ultrasound examination will be performed using a Lumify linear probe (frequency range 4-12 MHz). In the longitudinal projection, the doctor will assess the sites of the spinal cord endings by marking them with a sterile marker - a horizontal line on the patient's back. In the same projection, the doctor will designate a safe and optimal site (the greatest width of the dural sac) for performing a lumbar puncture by marking it with a sterile marker. Additionally, in the longitudinal projection, the researcher will measure the depth from the skin surface to the dura mater. Then, in the transverse projection, the doctor will confirm the absence of the spinal cord at the planned puncture site and the optimal amount of cerebrospinal fluid in the selected space. This information will be passed on to the operator, who will ultimately decide on the location of the lumbar puncture.

In patients in the control group, the lumbar puncture will be performed by palpation, without additional interventions. The position of the patient in both groups will depend on the preferences of the physician performing the puncture. The procedure time will be measured from the moment the needle pierces the skin until the moment of obtaining cerebrospinal fluid or removing the needle if the fluid is not obtained. In the research group, the time of the ultrasound examination will be additionally measured.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • children <18 years of age
  • patients who are scheduled to undergo lumbar puncture
  • consent of legal guardian

Exclusion criteria

  • infection of skin and tissues in the area of planned puncture
  • developmental defects of the spine and spinal cord
  • lack of consent of legal guardian
  • contraindications to lumbar puncture

Treatment and study plan

bedside ultrasound examination of the lumbar spinal canal

Diagnostic Test

The ultrasound examination will be performed using a Lumify linear probe (frequency range 4-12 MHz). In the longitudinal projection, the doctor will assess the spinal cord endings by marking them with a sterile marker - a horizontal line on the patient's back. In the same projection, the doctor will designate a safe and optimal place (the greatest width of the dural sac) for performing a lumbar puncture by marking it with a sterile marker. Additionally, in the longitudinal projection, the researcher will measure the depth from the skin surface to the dura mater. Then, in the transverse projection, the doctor will confirm the absence of the spinal cord at the planned puncture site and the optimal amount of cerebrospinal fluid in the selected space. This information will be passed on to the operator, who will ultimately decide on the lumbar puncture site.

Primary outcomes

  1. Obtaining cerebrospinal fluid after the first attempt at lumbar puncture

    Time frame: 1 day

    Obtaining cerebrospinal fluid after the first attempt at lumbar puncture (at least 0.5 ml in volume, with a red blood cell count of <10,000/mm3).

Secondary outcomes

  1. obtaining cerebrospinal fluid - < 10,000/mm3 - at any attempt

    Time frame: 1 day

    obtaining cerebrospinal fluid (volume min. 0.5 ml, with erythrocyte count < 10,000/mm3) in subsequent puncture attempts

  2. obtaining cerebrospinal fluid - > 10,000/mm3 - at any attempt

    Time frame: 1 day

    obtaining bloody cerebrospinal fluid (volume min. 0.5 ml, with erythrocyte count > 10,000/mm3)

  3. total number of puncture attempts to obtain cerebrospinal fluid

    Time frame: 1 day

    total number of puncture attempts to obtain cerebrospinal fluid in each patient (next puncture will be understood as another puncture of the skin with a needle)

  4. unsuccessful puncture - failure to obtain cerebrospinal fluid

    Time frame: 1 day

    total number of participants with unsuccessful puncture - failure to obtain cerebrospinal fluid

  5. duration of puncture

    Time frame: 1 day

    Mean duration of puncture for each patient Measured from the moment of puncturing the skin with the needle to the moment of obtaining cerebrospinal fluid or removal of the needle in the case of unsuccessful puncture.

    Measured in seconds.

  6. assessment of the impact of ultrasound imaging on the effectiveness of lumbar puncture depending on the experience of the physician performing the lumbar puncture

    Time frame: 1 day

    Difference in success rate depending on experience - measured by the number of punctures performed so far) puncture: 0-5 low experience, 6-15 medium experience, >15 high experience.

  7. assessment of the impact of ultrasound imaging on the effectiveness of lumbar puncture depending on the patient's BMI z-score

    Time frame: 1 day

    Difference in success rate depending onthe patient's BMI z-score

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Agata - Ćwiek, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

22-317-95-37

Maciej - Kołodziej, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

22-317-95-37

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Medical University of Warsaw

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Bedside Ultrasound on the Effectiveness of Lumbar Puncture in Children - Open-label Randomized Trial

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Sep 5, 2024
Registry last updated
Jul 30, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.