University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, 98115, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Aaron Lyon, PhD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NCT Number: NCT05989568
For the approximately one in five children with social, emotional, and behavioral (SEB) challenges, accessible evidence-based prevention practices (EBPPs) are critical. In the United States, schools are the primary service setting for children's SEB service delivery but EBPPs are rarely adopted or implemented by educators (e.g., teachers) with sufficient fidelity to see effects. Given that individual behavior change is ultimately required for successful implementation, focusing on individual-level processes holds promise as a parsimonious approach to enhance adoption. Beliefs and Attitudes for Successful Implementation in Schools for Teachers (BASIS-T) is a pragmatic, multifaceted pre-implementation strategy targeting volitional and motivational mechanisms of educators' behavior change to enhance implementation and student SEB outcomes. This study protocol describes a hybrid type 3 effectiveness-implementation trial designed to evaluate the main effects, mediators, and moderators of the BASIS-T implementation strategy in the context of Positive Greetings at the Door (PGD), a universal school-based EBPP previously demonstrated to reduce student disruptive behavior and increase academic engagement.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Seattle, Washington, 98115, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Aaron Lyon, PhD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
BASIS-T is designed to address the behavioral components often missing from standard EBPP training and consultation that relate to motivation prior to receiving EBPP training, and volition after EBPP training. It is an EBPP-agnostic implementation strategy designed to be delivered within the Preparation/Adoption phase, immediately prior to Active Implementation (CITE EPIS). BASIS-T targets behavioral intentions via improvement in attitudes, subjective norms, and self-efficacy.
Teachers assigned to the ACC will receive pre- and post-training experiences designed to mirror those received in the BASIS-T condition. These training experiences will be virtual, delivered by the same interventionist, and be approximately the same length as the BASIS-T experiences, but will not contain any of the BASIS-T content or mechanisms of change. The ACC pre-training experience will define, describe, and advocate for EBP implementation in schools. Content will be didactic, as is typical in professional development training for teachers.
Time frame: Baseline, 2-weeks, 4-weeks, 2-months, 3-months, 4-months, 5-months, 6-months, 9-months, 15-months
Evidence-Based Attitudes Scale - a 15-item tool that captures attitudes toward evidence-based practices. The scale includes internally consistent scores including total score and subscale scores: (1) appeal of EBP, (2) openness to new practices, (3) likelihood of adopting an evidence-based practice, and (4) perceived divergence between current and evidence-based practices. Minimum Score 0, Maximum Score 4. Higher Scores mean better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline, 2-weeks, 4-weeks, 2-months, 3-months, 4-months, 5-months, 6-months, 9-months, 15-months
Subjective Norms about EBPP Implementation will be measured via 6-item self-report measure developed based on established guidelines to capture injunctive and descriptive norms regarding specific behaviors. Minimum Score 0, Maximum Score 800. Higher Scores mean better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline, 2-weeks, 4-weeks, 2-months, 3-months, 4-months, 5-months, 6-months, 9-months, 15-months
Modified Teacher Self-Efficacy Scale. A modified version of the Teacher Self-Efficacy Scale will be used to assess educators' self-efficacy belief. This scale includes 10-items that assess teachers' confidence and self-efficacy regarding teaching practices. This measure will also be used to assess maintenance self-efficacy after teachers initiate implementation of PGD. Minimum Score 0, Maximum Score 4. Higher Scores mean better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline, 2-weeks, 4-weeks, 2-months, 3-months, 4-months, 5-months, 6-months, 9-months, 15-months
Modified-Intentions to Use Scale (Intentions). The Modified-Intentions to Use Scale is based on work investigating practitioners' intention to adhere to measurement-based care. The survey includes 5-items modified to be consistent with educators' intentions to use SEB EBPs. This survey is qualitative, and therefore does not have numerical scoring.
Time frame: 2-weeks, 4-weeks, 2-months, 3-months, 4-months, 5-months, 6-months, 9-months, 15-months
Adoption data will be gathered via monthly self-report checklist of fidelity. Minimum Score 0, Maximum Score 15. Higher Scores mean better outcome.
Time frame: Beginning of School Year, Mid-School Year, End of School Year
School administrative staff will be trained to conduct PGD fidelity observations and complete a PGD observation form 3 times per teacher over the course of the school year. Minimum Score 0, Maximum Score 6. Higher Scores mean better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline, 2-weeks, 4-weeks, 2-months, 3-months, 4-months, 5-months, 6-months, 9-months, 15-months
A self-report checklist will be used to capture adherence to delivering core PGD practices as planned. Teachers will complete the checklist monthly both years. Minimum Score 0, Maximum Score 15. Higher Scores mean better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline, 2-weeks, 4-weeks, 2-months, 3-months, 4-months, 5-months, 6-months, 9-months, 15-months
Reach will be computed using the fidelity data to determine the proportion of students who are receiving PGD practices. Specifically, teachers who are delivering PGD practices with 75% or greater fidelity will be classified as classrooms where students are receiving PGD. The number of students in these classrooms will be divided by the total students across classrooms of teachers who have received PGD training.
Time frame: 9-months
Schools will complete a survey on student educational outcomes for the year, including questions related to grades, test scores, and attendance. There is no reporting on a scale.
Time frame: Baseline, 2-weeks, 4-weeks, 2-months, 3-months, 4-months, 5-months, 6-months, 9-months, 15-months
Survey measure including questions related to classroom on-task behavior, classroom disruptive behavior, and classroom prosocial behavior. These questions all are part of the same scale.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
University of Washington
Other
Supporting Teachers in Implementing Classroom Practices to Build Better Student-Teacher Relationships
Acronym: BASIS-T
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05201534
Behavior, Behavior and Behavior Mechanisms
Palo Alto, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06209060
Behavior, Behavior, Animal
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT05525962
Adolescent - Emotional Problem, Adolescent Behavior
Canteleu, France
View Trial DetailsNCT05987761
Autism, Autism Spectrum Disorder
Palo Alto, California, United States
View Trial Details