Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01574534

Basel Stent Kosten Effektivitäts Trial Drug Eluting Balloons vs. Drug Eluting Stents in Small Vessel Interventions

The investigators hypothesize that in a real-world population undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for de-novo stenoses in small native vessels with a diameter <3 mm, drug eluting balloons (DEB) are non inferior to third-generation drug eluting stents (DES).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Medizinische Universität Graz Kardiologie, Graz, Austria

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Drug-eluting balloons are an established treatment for in-stent stenoses and showed good results in small vessels. Moreover, the available data suggest that DEB are a promising new technique for the treatment of de-novo stenoses in small vessels if pre-dilatation is performed and geographical mismatch is avoided.

The aim of this study is to demonstrate that DEB is non-inferior to DES in a real-world population with respect to the combined clinical endpoint Major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization after 12 months.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Angina pectoris Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) 2 to 4 or silent ischemia as assessed by stress echocardiography, stress cardiac magnetic resonance, myocardial perfusion scintigraphy, or fractional flow reserve
  • PCI of de-novo stenosis in vessels ≥2.0 to <3.0 mm in diameter irrespective of the indication (concomitant PCI of a vessel ≥3.0 mm in diameter is permitted if the stenosis is located in a coronary artery other than the culprit vessel)
  • No flow-limiting dissection (TIMI ≤2) or residual stenosis >30% after initial dilatation with a standard or non-compliant balloon, as assessed by the physician in charge
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Concomitant large-diameter PCI in the same coronary artery (LAD, Ramus circumflexus (RCX), RCA)
  • PCI of instent-restenosis (culprit lesion)
  • Life expectancy <12 months
  • Pregnancy
  • Enrolled in another coronary intervention study
  • Unable to give informed consent

Treatment and study plan

Drug Eluting Balloon

Device

PCI using paclitaxel-eluting SeQuent® Please balloon, B. Braun Melsungen AG, Berlin, Germany

Drug eluting stent

Device

PCI using paclitaxel-eluting Taxus Element® stent, Boston Scientific Corp, Natick MA

Primary outcomes

  1. Major adverse cardiac events

    Time frame: 12 month

    Major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization after 12 months.

Secondary outcomes

  1. MACE

    Time frame: 24/36 month

    MACE after 24 and 36 months

  2. Revascularization

    Time frame: 12/24/36 month

    The single components of the primary endpoint including target lesion revascularization after 12, 24, and 36 months

  3. Stent Thrombosis

    Time frame: 12/24/36 month

    Possible, probable, and definite stent thrombosis defined according to the ARC criteria after 12, 24, and 36 months; all stent thromboses defined according to the ARC criteria after 12, 24, and 36 months

  4. Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction

    Time frame: 12/24/36 month

    Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) major bleeding after 12, 24, and 36 months

    Net clinical benefit consisting of the primary endpoint and the TIMI major bleeding after 12, 24, and 36 months

  5. Cost-effectiveness

    Time frame: 12/24/36 month

    Cost-effectiveness of DEB vs. DES after 12, 24, and 36 months

  6. Quantitative Coronary Analysis (QCA)

    Time frame: 12 months

    QCA of patients who had events which required CAG/PCI after Baseline PCI

  7. Outcome in patients with high bleeding risk including patients on OAC

    Time frame: 12 months

    Outcome analyis of patients with high bleeding risk with regard to Major bleeding events (BARC)

  8. Outcome in acute versus stable CAD

    Time frame: 12 months

    Difference of the Population with acute versus stable CAD with regard to baseline characteristics, primary and secondary outcome measures (MACE, stent thrombosis, major bleeding)

  9. Outcome in diabetics vs non diabetics

    Time frame: 12 months

    Difference of the diabetic versus non-diabetic population regarding baseline characteristics and primary and secondary outcome measures (MACE, stent thrombosis, major bleeding)

  10. sex specific inequalities in the use of drug coated balloons for small coronary artery disease

    Time frame: 12 months

    sex specific difference in baseline charchteristics, Impact of sex on safety and efficacy in the stent-free strategy regarding primary and secondary endpoint (MACE, stent thrombosis, major bleeding)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Other

Collaborators

  • Clinical Trial Unit, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland

Registry information

Official study title

A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Open Label, Multicenter Trial to Test the Non-inferiority of Drug Eluting Balloon vs. Drug Eluting Stent Treatment in de Novo Stenoses of Small Native Vessels Regarding Efficacy and Safety

Acronym: BASKET-SMALL2

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2020
First posted
Apr 10, 2012
Registry last updated
Jun 24, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.