Language Rehab and Cognition Lab, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15260, United States
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT05653440
Aphasia is a language disorder caused by stroke and other acquired brain injuries that affects over two million people in the United States and which interferes with life participation and quality of life. Anomia (i.e., word- finding difficulty) is a primary frustration for people with aphasia. Picture-based naming treatments for anomia are widely used in aphasia rehabilitation, but current treatment approaches do not address the long-term retention of naming abilities and do not focus on using these naming abilities in daily life. The current research aims to evaluate novel anomia treatment approaches to improve long-term retention and generalization to everyday life.
This study is one of two that are part of a larger grant. This record is for sub-study 1, which will adaptively balance effort and accuracy using speeded naming deadlines.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15260, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Study 1: Evaluate the benefits of balancing effortful and errorless learning via adaptive naming deadlines.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Naming treatment condition in which the target will be immediately provided for repetition at picture onset.
Naming treatment condition in which participants will have up to 10 seconds to respond before the target is provided for repetition.
Naming treatment condition in which naming deadlines will be determined based on the balanced effort-to-accuracy benefit ratio formalized above, calculated on clinician-provided accuracy and response time ratings. Deadlines will be recalculated session-by-session to adjust to participant-specific treatment gains over time.
Time frame: Initial assessment (pre-treatment), 3 months post-treatment
Confrontation naming accuracy of pictures targeted in each training condition will serve as a primary outcome. Individualized lists for each participant will be selected from a corpus of pictured objects. Performance will be evaluated twice at each timepoint. Change in performance from initial assessment to the 3-month follow-up timepoint on the treated items will serve as the primary outcome measure.
Time frame: Initial assessment (pre-treatment), 3 months post-treatment
Confrontation naming accuracy of pictured untreated items (matched for linguistic difficulty to treated items in the primary outcome) for each training condition will serve as a secondary outcome control condition.
Time frame: Initial assessment (pre-treatment), 3 months post-treatment
Production of trained words on the context generalization complex scene description task for each training condition and corresponding untreated items will serve as a secondary outcome. Words from complex scenes and wordless picture books will be chosen for each participant. These words will consist of a subset of those selected for confrontation naming. Performance will be evaluated twice at each timepoint. Change in performance from initial assessment to the 3-month follow-up timepoint on the treated and untreated items will serve as a secondary outcome measure.
Time frame: Initial assessment (pre-treatment), 3-months post-treatment
The Aphasia Bank Discourse Protocol is a brief, but thorough set of language tasks which will characterize participants' language at the discourse level. The protocol requires participants to generate discourse samples within the contexts of free speech, a picture description, a story narrative, and procedural discourse. Change in performance in core lexicon analysis on discourse samples from initial assessment to each post-treatment follow up timepoint will serve as a secondary outcome measure.
Time frame: Initial assessment (pre-treatment), 1 week post-treatment.
The Aphasia Communication Outcome Measure (ACOM) is a measure of patient-reported "communication functioning," defined as the ability to effectively convey and receive personally relevant messages in natural environments. Results are provided in T scores (sample mean of 50 with a standard deviations of 10), with higher scores indicating better communication functioning.
Time frame: 1 week post-treatment
The adapted intrinsic motivation Inventory for aphasia is a brief instrument comprised of 7 subscales with a total of 45 items intended to characterize intrinsic motivation in people with aphasia. Each item is scored on a scale of 1-7. Higher total score is associated with higher intrinsic motivation.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
University of Pittsburgh
Other
Integrating Complementary Learning Principles in Aphasia Rehabilitation Via Adaptive Modeling (Sub-study 1: Balancing Effortful and Errorless Learning Via Adaptive Naming Deadlines)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04375722
Aphasia, Behavior
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05425615
Aphasia, Behavior
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06048159
Aphasia, Brain Diseases
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06974279
Aphasia, Behavior
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
View Trial Details