Balanced crystalloid solution
DrugMultiple electrolyte solution as boluses would be administered.
Other names: Plasma-Lyte A 148, Multiple electrolyte solution
NCT Number: NCT02835157
Fluid resuscitation is the cornerstone of pediatric shock management; current practices of fluid resuscitation in children are not evidence based. Normal saline is the preferred crystalloid recommended during initial resuscitation in shock, as the incidence of hyponatremia is lower with normal saline compared to all other fluids available and commonly used. However, normal saline has its own set of undesired physicochemical actions. Emerging data strongly indicate the increased incidence of hyperchloremia, metabolic acidosis and consequently, acute kidney injury associated with infusion of large volumes of normal saline. Balanced salt solutions or crystalloids, which have composition resembling plasma but lower chloride concentrations than normal saline, clearly decrease the risk of hyperchloremia and metabolic acidosis in adult as well as pediatric studies when used during the peri-operative period. The results favored balanced solutions in comparison to normal saline. Recent systematic reviews comparing balanced or buffered versus non-buffered fluids for surgery in adults favored the former solution as the metabolic derangements were less with the use of this type of fluid. In adult patients, the two solutions have been compared in various other settings as well such as in traumatic brain injury and in shock. The results favored balanced solutions in comparison to normal saline. However, in the non-surgical setting there is a paucity of evidence on the use of these solutions in children with shock and more evidence needs to be generated to support or refute the use of this fluid as compared to normal saline.
Given this background, the investigators decided to compare the effect of two solutions on the incidence of acute kidney injury in children resuscitated with either of the two fluids. Children receiving at least one fluid bolus at 20 ml/kg in the first hour would be enrolled and followed up for the proposed outcome variables. The investigators plan to enroll 708 patients over a period of 3 years. The investigators believe that the proposed study will provide answer to the research question of which of the fluids could be preferred for resuscitation.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me2 month–15 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
St Johns Medical College and Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
Background
Fluid resuscitation is the cornerstone of pediatric shock management; current practices of fluid resuscitation in children are not evidence based. Emerging data strongly indicate the increased incidence of hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis and consequently, acute kidney injury associated with infusion of large volumes of normal saline in critically ill adults in shock. Balanced salt solutions or crystalloids, which have composition resembling plasma but lower chloride concentrations than normal saline, have shown to decrease the risk of hyperchloremia and metabolic acidosis in adult as well as pediatric studies when used during the peri-operative period. In adult patients, the two solutions have been compared in various other settings as well such as in traumatic brain injury and in shock. The results favored balanced solutions in comparison to normal saline. However, in the non-surgical setting there is a paucity of evidence on the use of these solutions in children with shock and more evidence needs to be generated to support or refute the use of this fluid as compared to normal saline.
Objectives
Primary To examine if use of 'balanced crystalloids (multiple electrolyte solution)" results in lower incidence of new or progressive Acute kidney injury (defined as increase in serum creatinine by > 0.3mg/dL within 48 hours or to 1.5 times baseline or more within the last 7 days or urine output less than 0.5 mL/kg/h for 6 hours) in the first seven days after initial fluid resuscitation as compared to saline.
Secondary
To evaluate the difference if any, between two fluid types with regard to the following secondary objectives such as:
Site of study
Pediatric emergency and PICU, Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of medical Sciences,New Delhi
Other sites
PGIMER, Chandigarh, JIPMER Puducherry and St Johns Medical College Bengaluru
Study Design
Randomized controlled trial (safety and superiority for kidney injury). Multicenter trial.
Study Duration
3 years
Study definitions
Septic shock is defined as children who have a suspected infection manifested by hypothermia or hyperthermia and have at least two clinical signs of decreased perfusion with or without hypotension such as decreased mental status, prolonged capillary refill of >2 secs (cold shock) or flash capillary refill (warm shock), diminished (cold shock) or bounding (warm shock) peripheral pulses, mottled cool extremities (cold shock), or decreased urine output of <1 ml/kg/hr).
Therapeutic end points
Hyperchloremia: Defined as serum chloride value of >108 meq/L, based on our laboratory cut off of 98-108 meq/L Metabolic acidosis: pH of less than 7.35 with serum bicarbonate < 24 meq/L with low to normal pCO2 (<40 mm Hg)
Acute kidney injury: An abrupt (within 48-hr) reduction in kidney function defined as an absolute increase in serum creatinine of more than or equal to 0.3 mg/dl, an increase in serum creatinine of more than or equal to 1.5 fold from the value preceding the abnormal value, or reduction in urine output (oliguria of less than 0.5 ml/kg per hour for >6-hr).
Enrollment
All children with features of shock as per standard definitions will be screened for eligibility. Of these, children who require at least one fluid bolus of 20 ml/kg will be enrolled. The eligible participants would be enrolled after obtaining informed consent from one of the parents.
Randomization
Once enrolled, the participants would be randomized into 2 groups. 'MES' or 'study group' will receive the balanced fluids and 'saline' or 'control group' will receive 0.9% saline. Process of randomization will be done by an investigator who will have no further role in collecting the baseline variables, applying intervention or analysis of outcome(s). Block randomization will be done in varying block sizes of 2 to 8. The random number table generated from computer software would be used for this purpose.
Sample size estimation
The investigators calculated that a sample size of 354 patients in each group (708 total) would be required to detect an absolute reduction in incidence of AKI from 25% (current incidence in children with shock in the unit) to 15% assuming a two-sided α level of 0.05 and a statistical power of 90%. The sample size was calculated using Stata 11. The investigators expect the required sample size to be collected within 3 years period in the three centers.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Multiple electrolyte solution as boluses would be administered.
Other names: Plasma-Lyte A 148, Multiple electrolyte solution
saline as boluses would be administered
Other names: Saline
Time frame: From the time of randomization/intervention to 7 days of admission
Incidence of new or progressive AKI in first 7 days after randomization/ intervention
Time frame: At 6, 24, 48 and 72 hours after randomization
Incidence of hyperchloremia
Time frame: From the time of randomization to 6 hours
Total number of fluid boluses received in the first 6 hours after randomization/intervention
Time frame: From the time of randomization to 72 hours
Total fluids received in first 24 hours, 24-48 hours and 48-72 hours
Time frame: From the time of randomization till death or discharge from ICU, whichever came first assessed upto 100 days
Death during ICU course
Time frame: From the time of onset of AKI after randomization till death or discharge from hospital, whichever came first assessed upto 100 days
Time taken for resolution of AKI
Time frame: At 24 and 48 hours after randomization
Comparison of SOFA scores in both groups at 24 hours and 48 hours after randomization
Time frame: At 24 and 48 hours after randomization
Comparison of PELOD scores in both groups at 24 hours and 48 hours after randomization
Time frame: At admission and at 6, 24, 48 and 72 hours after randomization
Comparison of number of children in both groups with acidosis at 6, 24, 48 and 72 hours after randomization
Time frame: From the time of randomization/intervention to 7 days of admission
New or progressive AKI requiring dialysis (serious adverse event)
Time frame: From the time of randomization/intervention to mortality
IN-ICU mortality in patients with AKI (serious adverse event)
Time frame: From the time of initiating the bolus to its completion
Infusion related adverse events- fever, rash, extravasation, hypervolemia/fluid overload
All India Institute of Medical Sciences
Other
Multiple Electrolyte Solution vs. Saline in Pediatric Septic Shock
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04089098
Hemodynamic Instability, Infections
Leipzig, Saxony, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT02558166
Acute Kidney Injury, Cardiogenic Shock
Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands
View Trial DetailsNCT07616817
Infections, Inflammation
Albany, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07203833
Biomarker, Infection
Amiens, France
View Trial Details