Bo Wu
Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China
Location contact
Bo Wu
CONTACT
Tianxiang Lan
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT07318948
Elevated blood pressure (BP) is nearly universal in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and critically influences eligibility for intravenous thrombolysis; however, current guidelines-requiring BP reduction to below 185/110 mmHg before treatment-lack robust evidence and may delay reperfusion in a time-sensitive therapy, potentially worsening outcomes. Emerging data suggest that aggressive pre-thrombolysis BP lowering does not reduce hemorrhage risk and might impair recovery, highlighting the need to avoid large BP fluctuations. Yet it remains uncertain whether initiating thrombolysis concurrently with antihypertensive therapy is safer and more effective than the standard sequential approach, particularly in patients with markedly elevated but not extreme BP (systolic <220 mmHg).
To address this gap, the BALANCE trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled study enrolling AIS patients within 4.5 hours of onset whose pre-thrombolysis BP exceeds regional guideline thresholds (e.g., >180/100 mmHg in China or >185/110 mmHg internationally) but is <220 mmHg and who are otherwise eligible for thrombolysis. Patients are randomized to either: (1) concurrent management-immediate thrombolysis with simultaneous IV antihypertensive therapy to gradually lower BP-or (2) sequential management-antihypertensive treatment first, followed by thrombolysis only after BP reaches target. The primary endpoint is a hierarchical composite analyzed using the win ratio, prioritizing: (1) functional outcome (90-day mRS distribution), (2) major safety (symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage within 7 days per SITS-MOST criteria), and (3) process efficiency (door-to-needle time).
Conducted across 80-100 global stroke centers, BALANCE aims to provide definitive evidence to optimize BP management and improve outcomes in AIS patients with elevated BP.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China
Bo Wu
CONTACT
Tianxiang Lan
CONTACT
Hypertension is the most common physiological abnormality in patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke (AIS), and elevated blood pressure (BP) plays a critical role in determining eligibility and timing for intravenous thrombolysis.
Current international guidelines recommend lowering BP to below 185/110 mmHg before administering thrombolytic therapy, a process that requires antihypertensive treatment and inevitably delays thrombolysis. However, this recommendation lacks robust evidence. Meanwhile, because the effectiveness of thrombolysis is highly time-dependent, these BP-lowering delays may worsen clinical outcomes by prolonging door-to-needle time and delaying reperfusion.
On the other hand, recent prospective studies on blood pressure management before and after thrombolysis and thrombectomy have shown that lower BP levels do not significantly reduce the risk of hemorrhage and may lead to poorer long-term outcomes. Although these studies compared BP ranges below 180 or 185 mmHg, it remains unclear whether this pattern applies to patients with severely elevated BP. These findings suggest the importance of avoiding large and rapid BP fluctuations. Initiating thrombolysis after BP reduction could result in significant BP fluctuations and prolonged periods of low BP post-thrombolysis.
Given the lack of high-quality evidence on optimal treatment strategies for patients with pre-thrombolysis hypertension, an alternative concurrent BP management strategy has been proposed. This approach involves initiating thrombolysis and antihypertensive treatment simultaneously. By doing so, it aims to minimize treatment delays while maintaining BP control within accepted post-thrombolysis targets. However, concerns exist about whether initiating thrombolysis at higher-than-recommended BP levels increases the risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage or other complications. Consequently, substantial clinical uncertainty exists regarding which strategy-concurrent or sequential BP management-is superior for patients.
The BALANCE trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled study compare the effectiveness and safety between concurrent and sequential strategies. The concurrent strategy involves immediate initiation of intravenous thrombolysis, accompanied by simultaneous IV antihypertensive therapy to gradually lower BP during and after thrombolysis. In contrast, the sequential strategy starts with antihypertensive treatment, and thrombolysis is withheld until BP falls within guideline-recommended limits. AIS patients presenting within 4.5 hours of symptom onset with pre-thrombolysis BP exceeding guideline-recommended ranges (e.g., China: 180/100 mmHg; U.S./Canada/Europe: 185/110 mmHg) but below 220 mmHg, and who are otherwise eligible for intravenous thrombolysis, will be enrolled across 80-100 stroke centers worldwide. The primary endpoint is a hierarchical composite outcome analyzed using the win ratio method. It comprises three components, prioritized in the following order: (1) functional outcome, defined as the distribution of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at 90 days after randomization; (2) major safety, defined as the occurrence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) within 7 days after randomization according to the SITS-MOST criteria; and (3) process efficiency, defined as door-to-needle time (DNT)-the interval from emergency department arrival to the start of thrombolytic infusion. In pairwise comparisons between treatment groups, a patient "wins" if they have a better outcome on the highest-priority component where a difference exists.
By evaluating these two fundamentally different management pathways, the BALANCE trial seeks to generate definitive evidence that may inform future guideline recommendations and optimize care for patients with acute ischemic stroke and elevated blood pressure.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
*The qualifying blood pressure must be confirmed by two separate measurements taken at least one minute apart from the same arm, using an appropriately sized cuff while the patient is in a supine or semi-recumbent position.
Exclusion criteria
Lowering the blood pressure and undergoing thrombolysis at the same time while the partipants blood pressure is higher than 185/110 mmHg or 180/100 mmHg.
Time frame: 90-day
The win ratio is a patient-centered statistical method that allows for the comparison of treatment arms across several prioritized outcomes. It provides a more holistic assessment of the net clinical benefit. The hierarchy is ordered based on clinical importance:
Process Efficiency: Defined as the time between emergency department entry to thrombolysis start (DNT).
Time frame: 90-day
The proportion of patients with an mRS score of 0-1 at 90 days.
Time frame: 90-day
The proportion of patients with an mRS score of 0-2 at 90 days.
Time frame: 90-day
The mRS score at 90 days and the utility weighted mRS.
Time frame: 90-day
Quality of Life measured using the EQ-5D-5L at 90 days.
Time frame: 72±12 hours
The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score assessed between 72±12 hours post-randomization.
Time frame: 72±12 hour
Defined as achieving an NIHSS score of 0-1 or a decrease of ≥4 points from the baseline NIHSS score at the 72±12 hour assessment.
Time frame: 90-day
All-cause mortality at 90 days.
Time frame: 90-day
The incidence of malignant edema, adjudicated by the central imaging core lab according to follow-up imaging and medical history.
Time frame: 24-hour
DNT, the time between emergency department entry to thrombolysis start.
Time frame: 7-day
The primary definition of sICH is based on SITS-MOST criteria. sICH will be diagnosed only when both radiological and clinical criteria are met:
Radiological criterion: Presence of parenchymal hematoma type 2 (PH2) on follow-up neuroimaging, defined as a dense hematoma.
Clinical criterion: Neurological deterioration of ≥4 points on the NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) compared with baseline, or death.
The sensitivity analysis for sICH will use the NINDS definition. sICH will be diagnosed only when both radiological and clinical criteria are met: Radiological criterion: Any intracranial hemorrhage (including hemorrhagic infarction or parenchymal hematoma). Clinical criterion: Any worsening of neurological status, with no minimum NIHSS threshold specified.
Time frame: 7-day
Any evidence of ICH on follow-up imaging up to 7 days.
Time frame: 7-day
All follow-up imaging will be systematically assessed by the central core lab using the Heidelberg Bleeding Classification to categorize any hemorrhagic event.
Time frame: 7-day
All-cause mortality at 7 days and in-hospital mortality.
Time frame: From randomization through Day 4 or hospital discharge, whichever occurs first.
In line with the pragmatic design of the trial, the formal collection and reporting of SAEs will be limited to the period from randomization through Day 4 or hospital discharge, whichever occurs first.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Bijoy Menon, MD, PhD
CONTACT
Bo Wu
CONTACT
Bo Wu
Other
BALANCE Trial Protocol - Blood Pressure Lowering and Thrombolysis: Concurrent vs Sequential Management in Acute Ischemic Stroke
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07739160
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Brain Diseases
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07013396
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Anterior Cerebral Artery Stroke
Richmond, Virginia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07682922
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Brain Diseases
Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07672795
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Basilar Artery Occlusion
View Trial Details