Assiut University Urology Hospital
Asyut, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT06939062
This is a comparative study of the efficacy and safety of endoscopic bipolar transurethral resection and enucleation of the prostate in management of benign prostatic hyperplasia patients with medium-sized prostates
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me45 year–80 year
Male
Interventional
Not applicable
Asyut, Egypt
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a highly prevalent condition among aging males, with incidence rates escalating progressively with age. Epidemiological data indicate that approximately 8% of men in their fourth decade are affected, a proportion that rises to 50% by the sixth decade and exceeds 80% in individuals reaching their ninth decade. BPH may induce bladder outlet obstruction (BOO), leading to lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). LUTS are one of the most frequent urological complaints in aging males. LUTS are typically categorized into obstructive and storage subtypes, with clinical BPH representing the predominant underlying etiology.
Approximately 20% of men with BPH will eventually require surgical intervention. Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) remains the gold-standard surgical treatment, offering both immediate relief of intravesical obstruction and durable improvement in voiding parameters and symptoms. However, the procedure carries significant risks, including perioperative bleeding and transurethral resection syndrome (TUR syndrome), with complication rates increasing proportionally to prostate size.
The recent technological advancements in urological equipment have led to increased adoption of bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (B-TURP) for BPH management. This technique employs a plasma kinetic system that provides superior coagulation capabilities. A significant advantage of B-TURP is its use of normal saline irrigation, which substantially reduces the risk of TUR syndrome compared to conventional methods. Clinical studies have demonstrated B-TURP's efficacy in relieving bladder outlet obstruction secondary to BPH, with outcomes comparable to traditional approaches.
Despite advancements in TURP technology, incidence of complications such as postoperative recurrence remained unchanged, necessitating surgical innovation. In this context, bipolar enucleation of the prostate (BipoLEP) has emerged as an alternative technique designed to address these challenges. Our study was designed to conduct a comparative analysis of BipoLEP versus bipolar B-TURP in the treatment of medium-sized BPH patients.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Endoscopic transurethral enucleation of the prostate using bipolar energy
Endoscopic transurethral resection of the prostate using bipolar energy
Time frame: At 6 months after the procedure (BipolEP or B-TURP)
Treatment efficacy will be evaluated by comparing the change in international prostate symptom score (IPSS) between the two groups
Time frame: At 6 months after the procedure (BipolEP or B-TURP)
Treatment safety will be evaluated by collecting and analyzing any reported complication within the first 6 postoperative months. Complications will be reported using the modified Clavien-Dindo classification system.
Assiut University
Other
Efficacy and Safety of Bipolar Resection Versus Enucleation of the Prostate in Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Patients With Medium-sized Prostates: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07103278
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Genital Diseases
Seoul, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT06589154
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Genital Diseases
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07715448
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Ejaculatory Dysfunction
Banī Suwayf, Beni Suef Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT05200065
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Genital Diseases
Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt
View Trial Details