Chemotherapy
DrugRandomization to either Osimertinib or platinum-based doublet-chemotherapy on Day 1 of every 21d cycle in a 2:1 (Osimertinib:platinum-based doublet-chemotherapy) ratio
Other names: Osimertinib, Platinum-based Doublet-Chemotherapy
NCT Number: NCT02151981
A Phase III, Open Label, Randomized Study of Osimertinib versus Platinum-Based Doublet Chemotherapy for Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer whose Disease has Progressed with Previous Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy and whose Tumours harbour a T790M mutation within the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–130 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Research Site, Darlinghurst, Australia
This is a phase III, open label, randomized study assessing Osimertinib (80 mg, orally, once daily) versus platinum-based doublet chemotherapy (standard of care) in subjects with confirmed diagnosis of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) mutation positive NSCLC, who have progressed following prior therapy with an approved Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) agent and whose tumours harbour a T790M mutation within the EGFR Gene. Subjects must be chemotherapy naive and must agree to provide a biopsy for central confirmation of T790 mutation status following confirmed disease progression on their first line EGFR-TKI treatment (e.g. erlotinib, gefitinib or afatinib). Suitable subjects will then be randomized to receive either Osimertinib (80mg orally, once daily) or platinum-based doublet chemotherapy (pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 + carboplatin area under the plasma concentration-time curve AUC 5 or pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 + cisplatin 75 mg/m2) on Day 1 of every 21-day cycle in a 2:1 (Osimertinib: platinum-based doublet chemotherapy) ratio. Once subjects on the platinum-based doublet chemotherapy arm are determined to have objective radiological progression according to RECIST 1.1 by the investigator and confirmed by independent central imaging review, they will be given the opportunity to begin treatment with Osimertinib 80mg, once daily. These subjects may continue treatment with Osimertinib even after disease progression, as long as they are continuing to show clinical benefit, as judged by the investigator. The primary objective of the study is to assess the efficacy of Osimertinib compared with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy by assessment of Progression Free Survival (PFS), using investigator assessments according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST 1.1), as well as asensitivity analysis of Progression Free Survival using Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
For subjects who cross-over to Osimertinib:
Randomization to either Osimertinib or platinum-based doublet-chemotherapy on Day 1 of every 21d cycle in a 2:1 (Osimertinib:platinum-based doublet-chemotherapy) ratio
Other names: Osimertinib, Platinum-based Doublet-Chemotherapy
Once subjects on the platinum-based doublet chemotherapy arm are determined to have objective radiological progression according to RECIST 1.1 by the investigator and confirmed by independent central imaging review, they will be given the opportunity to begin treatment with Osimertinib 80mg, once daily. These subjects may continue treatment with Osimertinib even after disease progression, as long as they are continuing to show clinical benefit, as judged by the investigator.
Subjects who stop platinum-based doublet chemotherapy for reasons other than objective disease progression according to RECIST 1.1 will not be eligible to cross-over to Osimertinib.
Time frame: RECIST tumour assessments every 6 weeks from randomisation until objective disease progression up to 19 months (at the time of the primary PFS analysis).
Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST v1.1) assessed by MRI or CT: Progressive Disease (PD): >= 20% increase in the sum of diameters of TLs and an absolute increase in sum of diameters of >=5mm (compared to the previous minimum sum) or progression of NTLs or a new lesion. PFS is the time from date of randomisation until the date of PD (by investigator assessment) or death (by any cause in the absence of progression) regardless of whether the patient withdrew from randomised therapy or received another anti-cancer therapy prior to progression. Patients who had not progressed or died at the time of analysis were censored at the time of the latest date of assessment from their last evaluable RECIST 1.1 assessment.
Time frame: RECIST tumour assessments every 6 weeks from randomisation until objective disease progression up to 19 months (at the time of the primary PFS analysis).
Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST v1.1) assessed by MRI or CT: Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions; Partial Response (PR): >= 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of Target Lesions (compared to baseline) and no new lesions. ORR is the percentage of patients with at least 1 visit response of CR or PR prior to progression or any further therapy.
Time frame: RECIST tumour assessments every 6 weeks from randomisation until objective disease progression up to 19 months (at the time of the primary PFS analysis).
Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST v1.1) assessed by MRI or CT: Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions; Partial Response (PR): >= 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of Target Lesions (compared to baseline) and no new lesions. DoR is the time from the date of first documented response until the date of documented progression or death in the absence of disease progression.
Time frame: RECIST tumour assessments every 6 weeks from randomisation until objective disease progression up to 19 months (at the time of the primary PFS analysis).
Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST v1.1) assessed by MRI or CT: Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions; Partial Response (PR): >= 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of Target Lesions (compared to baseline) and no new lesions; Stable disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify as a response nor sufficient growth to qualify as progression; Progressive Disease (PD): >= 20% increase in the sum of diameters of TLs and an absolute increase in sum of diameters of >=5mm (compared to the previous minimum sum) or progression of NTLs or a new lesion. DCR is the percentage of patients with best response of CR, PR or SD at >=6 weeks, prior to any progressive disease (PD).
Time frame: RECIST tumour assessments every 6 weeks from randomisation until objective disease progression up to 19 months (at the time of the primary PFS analysis).
Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST v1.1) assessed by MRI or CT: Tumour size was calculated as the sum of the longest diameters (SLD) of the Target Lesions. Tumour shrinkage is percentage change in tumour size from baseline using RECIST v1.1 tumour response.
Time frame: From date of randomization until time of final OS analysis, a median follow-up of 43 months
Time frame: From date of randomisation until time of final OS analysis, a median follow-up of 43 months
Time from randomisation to first subsequent anti-cancer therapy (FST) following randomised treatment discontinuation, or death if no FST administered. Any patient not known to have died nor received any subsequent anti-cancer therapy (ST) was censored at the last time known not to have received ST, ie, the last follow-up visit this was confirmed.
Time frame: From date of randomisation until time of final OS analysis, a median follow-up of 43 months
Time from randomisation to second subsequent anti-cancer therapy (SST) following randomised treatment discontinuation, or death if no SST administered. Any patient not known to have died nor received any SST was censored at the last time known not to have received SST, ie, the last follow-up visit this was confirmed.
AstraZeneca
Industry
A Phase III, Open Label, Randomized Study of AZD9291 Versus Platinum-Based Doublet Chemotherapy for Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Whose Disease Has Progressed With Previous Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy and Whose Tumours Harbour a T790M Mutation Within the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene (AURA3).
Acronym: AURA3
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07621289
Anticancer Treatment, Cancer
View Trial Details