Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02319135

Azacytidine (Vidaza®) Versus Fludarabine and Cytarabine (Fluga Scheme) in Elderly Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia

The hypothesis is that the replacement of the standard fludarabine and cytarabine based therapy by azacytidine could result in an improvement of RFS and OS rates in the experimental arm. To fulfill the medical needs in such frail and elderly population, improvements in terms of atileukemic efficacy in the azacytidine experimental arm should be attained without increasing the therapy-related toxicity or decreasing the patients QoL.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

65 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe

Valencia, 46026, Spain

About this study

This is a multicenter, randomized 1:1, open, and at national level, Phase III clinical trial.

This study will be conducted in 3 phases of different duration:

  • Selection phase (up to 14 days from the signature of informed consent): informed consent and review of the inclusion and exclusion criteria performing the relevant assessments.
  • Treatment Phase (from the start of treatment until the end of cycle 9): Induction phase (3 cycles) and consolidation phase (cycles 4-9). Study visits during treatment will be weekly during the induction phase (first 3 cycles) and every 2 weeks until the end of the consolidation phase.
  • Follow-up phase: monthly monitoring will be performed on all patients until they have completed a minimum of 2 years from the start of treatment, whether or not they continue receiving azacitidine cycles or Mini-Fluga according to the protocol. Following these 24 months, follow-up will be carried out at least quarterly. Patients suffering disease progression or relapse of the disease, or being early withdrawn due to any of the reasons specified in the protocol will be followed-up for survival until the end of the study or until the death of all patients, whichever comes first.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • - Having voluntarily given informed consent before performing any test that is not part of

routine care of patients.

  • - Age greater than or equal to 65.
  • - Morphological diagnosis of non-promyelocytic AML according to the WHO criteria.
  • - Newly diagnosed AML.
  • - ECOG performance status <4.
  • - Ability and willingness to comply with the schedule of study visits.

Exclusion criteria

  • - Genetic diagnosis of acute promyelocytic leukemia.
  • - Patients with AML secondary to myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or chronic myeloproloferative syndrome who have been previously treated with antileukemic agents

(hypomethylating or standard chemotherapy). Treatment with hydroxyurea prior to randomization is allowed.

  • - Serum creatinine ≥ 250 mmol / l (≥ 2.5 mg/dL) (unless attributed to AML).
  • - Bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase or ALT > 5 times the value of the upper limit of normal (unless attributed to AML) .
  • - Presence of an active and/or non controlled pathology different to AML which is severe and life-threatening, that in the investigator's opinion, prevents the subject participation in the study.
  • - Other active concomitant malignancy or whose remission is less than one year from the screening day (except carcinoma in situ).
  • - Presence of any psychiatric illness or medical condition that, in the investigator's opinion, prevents the subject participation in the study.
  • - Life expectancy less than X months.
  • - Inability of the patient or his legal representative to understand and voluntarily sign the informed consent form.

Treatment and study plan

Azacitadine

Drug

Fludarabine

Drug

Cytarabine

Drug

Lenograstim

Drug

Filgastrim

Drug

Primary outcomes

  1. Efficacy (overall survival (OS) attained without increasing the therapy-related toxicity or decreasing the patients QoL.

    Time frame: 4 years

    To evaluate the overall survival (OS) in one year treatment with 2 first-line regimens in newly diagnosed elderly patients: 3 cycles of induction chemotherapy based on fludarabine and cytarabine (FLUGA scheme) followed by maintenance with reduced doses(Mini-FLUGA) (standard treatment arm) versus subcutaneous azacitidine cycles (experimental treatment arm).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Efficacy (Event free survival (EFS)

    Time frame: 4 years

    Event free survival (EFS)

  2. Efficacy (Duration of remission.)

    Time frame: 4 years

    Duration of remission.

  3. Efficacy (Overall survival) Efficcacy

    Time frame: 3 years

    Overall survival at 2nd and 3rd year.

  4. Safety (Compare hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity)

    Time frame: 3 years

    Compare hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity in both arms.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

PETHEMA Foundation

Other

Collaborators

  • Dynamic Solutions

Registry information

Official study title

A PHASE III, MULTICENTRE, RANDOMIZED, OPEN LABEL CLINICAL TRIAL OF AZACYTIDINE (VIDAZA®) VERSUS FLUDARABINE AND CYTARABINE (FLUGA SCHEME) IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA.

Acronym: FLUGAZA

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2019
First posted
Dec 18, 2014
Registry last updated
Apr 6, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.