AXER-204
Drughuman NoGo Trap fusion protein
Other names: human NoGo Trap, human Nogo Receptor decoy
NCT Number: NCT03989440
This two-part trial will assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of AXER-204 administered by lumbar puncture and slow bolus infusion. Part 1 will evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of single ascending doses of AXER-204. Part 2 will evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of repeated doses AXER-204 in comparison to placebo.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California, United States
AXER-204 is a human fusion protein that acts as a soluble decoy/trap for the myelin-associated inhibitors of axonal growth known as Nogo-A, MAG, and OMgp. AXER-204 and a surrogate protein used in early preclinical studies have been found to promote axon growth and recovery of function in animal models of spinal cord injury.
Part 1 of the trial is a multicenter, open-label, single ascending dose study in participants with chronic cervical spinal cord injury. Four cohorts of 6 participants each are planned, with participants within each cohort expected to receive the same dose of AXER-204.
Part 2 is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, repeat dose study in chronic cervical spinal cord injury participants. Approximately 32 participants will be randomized (ratio 1:1) to receive repeated doses of AXER-204 or placebo (a phosphate buffered saline formulation). The dose level and dose frequency will be dependent upon outcomes from Part 1.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Key Inclusion Criteria:
Key Exclusion Criteria:
Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.
human NoGo Trap fusion protein
Other names: human NoGo Trap, human Nogo Receptor decoy
Phosphate buffered saline formulation
Time frame: Up to Day 29 for Part 1 and Day 253 for Part 2
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, is a life-threatening event, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in a significant disability/incapacity or congenital anomaly, or is a medically important event.
Time frame: Part 1: pre-dose and 1 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h post-dose, Day 4, 8, 15, and 29, Part 2: pre-dose and 4 h post-dose on days 1, 21, 42, 63, and 104; and on Study Days 169 and 253.
Time frame: Part 1: pre-dose and 1 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h post-dose, Day 4, 8, 15, and 29, Part 2: pre-dose and 4 h post-dose on days 1, 21, 42, 63, and 104; and on Study Days 169 and 253.
Time frame: Part 1: pre-dose and 1 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h post-dose, Day 4, 8, 15, and 29, Part 2: pre-dose and 4 h post-dose on days 1, 21, 42, 63, and 104; and on Study Days 169 and 253.
Time frame: Part 1: pre-dose and 1 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h post-dose, Day 4, 8, 15, and 29, Part 2: pre-dose and 4 h post-dose on days 1, 21, 42, 63, and 104; and on Study Days 169 and 253.
Time frame: Day 1 pre-dose up to Day 29 in Part 1, Pre-dose up to Day 253 in Part 2
Time frame: Part 1: pre-dose and 1 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h post-dose, Day 4, 8, 15, and 29, Part 2: pre-dose and 4 h post-dose on days 1, 21, 42, 63, and 104; and on Study Days 169 and 253.
Volume of distribution calculated from serum exposure data
Time frame: Part 1: pre-dose, post-dose at 24 h, 72 h, Days 8 and 29, Part 2: pre-dose on Days 1, 21, 42, 63, and 104, and on Day 253.
Time frame: Part 1: pre-dose, post-dose at 24 h, 72 h, Days 8 and 29, Part 2: pre-dose on Days 1, 21, 42, 63, and 104, and on Day 253.
Time frame: Part 1: pre-dose, post-dose at 24 h, 72 h, Days 8 and 29, Part 2: pre-dose on Days 1, 21, 42, 63, and 104, and on Day 253.
Time frame: Part 1: pre-dose, post-dose at 24 h, 72 h, Days 8 and 29, Part 2: pre-dose on Days 1, 21, 42, 63, and 104, and on Day 253.
Time frame: Baseline to Day 169
The ISNCSCI bilateral Upper Extremity Motor Score (UEMS) is determined by examining the muscle function within each of the 5 myotomes encompassing arm and hand function on each side of the body. A score ranging from 0 to 5 can be given to each myotome tested resulting in a maximum score of 50. Higher values indicate greater strength.
Time frame: Baseline to Day 169
The GRASSP Bilateral Prehension Performance Score is determined based on performance of four tasks with each hand with scores ranging from 0 to 5 for each task resulting in a maximum score of 40. Higher scores indicate better function.
Time frame: Baseline to Day 169
The SCIM III questionnaire self-care score assesses activities of daily living including feeding, bathing, dressing, and grooming. The self-care score ranges 0-20 with higher scores correspond to better ability to carry out these self-care activities.
Time frame: Day 169
The PGIC instrument captures the patient's overall evaluation of response to treatment. Specifically, the PGIC asks: "Since beginning this clinical trial, how would you describe the overall change (if any) related to your chronic spinal cord injury?" The patient is asked to report the degree to which they have changed since entering the treatment period using a 7-point Likert scale (1='Much worse', 2='Worse', 3='A little worse', 4='No change', 5='A little better', 6='Better', 7='Much better') and "If better or worse, what has changed?". Patients that have evaluation results including "Much better", "Better", or "A little better" are considered Responders.
ReNetX Bio, Inc.
Industry
A Multicenter, Two Part Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of AXER-204 in Subjects With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Acronym: RESET
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05965700
Central Nervous System Diseases, Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04074616
Chronic Spinal Cord Injury, Female Urogenital Diseases
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04697472
Chronic Spinal Cord Injury, Nervous System Diseases
Englewood, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05284201
Chronic Spinal Cord Injury, Nervous System Diseases
Englewood, Colorado, United States
View Trial Details