UPMC Hillman Cancer Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15232, United States
Location contact
Amy Rose, RN, BSN
CONTACT
Dannielle Bednarz, RN, BSN
CONTACT
John M Kirkwood, MD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NCT Number: NCT07631325
This first-in-human study will evaluate the safety, clinical activity, and immunologic effects of combining axelopran with nivolumab in patients with PD-1-refractory unresectable or metastatic cutaneous melanoma. Exploratory analyses incorporating opioid exposure history and post-hoc OPRM1 genotyping will inform future precision immuno-oncology strategies.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15232, United States
Amy Rose, RN, BSN
CONTACT
Dannielle Bednarz, RN, BSN
CONTACT
John M Kirkwood, MD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Immune checkpoint inhibitors have substantially improved outcomes in melanoma; however, resistance to PD-1 blockade remains a major clinical limitation. Approximately 60% of patients with metastatic melanoma fail to achieve an objective response to anti-PD-1 therapy, and many initial responders ultimately develop acquired resistance. These limitations highlight the need to identify additional, biologically grounded mechanisms of immune escape that can be therapeutically targeted. Importantly, pharmacologic inhibition of MOR with axelopran, a peripherally acting MOR antagonist restores T-cell effector function and enhances antitumor responses to PD-1 inhibition in preclinical oral squamous cell carcinoma models exposed to exogenous opioids. Notably, endogenous μ-opioid signaling in melanoma suppresses antitumor immunity via MOR, providing a rationale for evaluating peripheral MOR antagonism to enhance checkpoint inhibitor efficacy in melanoma. These findings suggest that constitutive MOR signaling may represent a distinct and targetable pathway of immune resistance that has not been addressed in current immunotherapy strategies.
To date, the role of MOR antagonism has not been evaluated clinically in melanoma, and the OPRM1-MOR axis has not been studied as a mechanism of immune escape in humans. This first-in-human study will evaluate the safety, clinical activity, and immunologic effects of combining axelopran with anti-PD-1 therapy in patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma who have progressed on prior PD-1-based treatment. Post hoc analyses incorporating exogenous opioid exposure and OPRM1 genotype will explore biologically relevant heterogeneity in treatment response and inform future precision-based approaches. Given the strong mechanistic rationale, consistent preclinical evidence of synergy, and the lack of effective options for patients with PD-1-refractory melanoma, this study addresses a critical unmet need and may establish MOR antagonism as a novel therapeutic strategy to overcome immune resistance in melanoma.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
a. Permanent sterilization (hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy, or bilateral oophorectomy) or documented postmenopausal status (defined as 12 months of amenorrhea in a woman > 45 years-of-age in the absence of other biological or physiological causes). Note: Documentation may include review of medical records, medical examination, or medical history interview by study site staff.
Exclusion criteria
i. Subjects that require intermittent use of bronchodilators or local steroid injections would not be excluded from the study. Subjects with stable hypothyroidism or Sjogren's syndrome will not be excluded from the study.
ii. Physiological replacement doses of steroids are permitted.
i. Note: Gastroesophageal reflux disease under medical treatment is allowed (assuming no drug interaction potential).
A peripherally restricted mu-opioid receptor antagonist (PAMORA) designed to mitigate the undesirable peripheral effects of opioids without compromising their central analgesic action.
An immune checkpoint inhibitor that helps the immune system attack cancer cells by blocking PD-1 receptors.
Other names: OPDIVO Qvantig
Time frame: Up to 30 days post end of treatment
Adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), AEs leading to discontinuation or death, and severity of AEs as assessed by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 (CTCAE v5.0) determined to be possibly, probably or definitely related to study treatment.
Time frame: Up to 3 years
The proportion of subjects with a confirmed best objective response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) based on RECIST v1.1. CR: Disappearance of all target lesions. Pathological lymph nodes must decrease to a short axis of < 10 mm. All non-target lesions must have disappeared, and tumor markers must have normalized. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, using baseline measurements as a reference.
Time frame: Up to 3 years
Time from date of first documented response Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) to date of documented Progressive Disease (PD) or death from any cause, based on RECIST v1.1. CR: Disappearance of all target lesions. Pathological lymph nodes must decrease to a short axis of < 10 mm. All non-target lesions must have disappeared, and tumor markers must have normalized. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, using baseline measurements as a reference. PD: At least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking the smallest sum on study (nadir) as the reference. In addition to the 20% relative increase, the sum must also show an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The unequivocal progression of non-target lesions or the appearance of any new lesion also classifies as PD.
Time frame: Up to 3 years
Best treatment response in target lesions based on RECIST v1.1. CR: Disappearance of all target lesions. Pathological lymph nodes must decrease to a short axis of < 10 mm. All non-target lesions must have disappeared, and tumor markers must have normalized. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, using baseline measurements as a reference.
Time frame: Up to 3 years
Time from date of first dose of study treatment to date of first documented Progressive Disease (PD) based on RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. PD: At least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking the smallest sum on study (nadir) as the reference. In addition to the 20% relative increase, the sum must also show an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The unequivocal progression of non-target lesions or the appearance of any new lesion also classifies as PD. iUPD (Unconfirmed Progressive Disease) requires a follow-up scan to confirm whether it is true tumor growth or temporary.
Time frame: Up to 4.5 years
Overall survival, defined as the time from date of first dose of study treatment to date of death from any cause.
Time frame: Up to 3 years
Proportion of subjects with a confirmed best objective response to immunotherapy of CR or PR based on iRECIST . CR: Disappearance of all target lesions. Pathological lymph nodes must decrease to a short axis of < 10 mm. All non-target lesions must have disappeared, and tumor markers must have normalized. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, using baseline measurements as a reference. CR or PR iUPD (one or more instances), but not iCPD, before iCR, iPR.
Time frame: Up to 3 years
Time from date of first documented response (CR or PR) to date of documented PD or death from any cause, based on iRECIST. CR: Disappearance of all target lesions. Pathological lymph nodes must decrease to a short axis of < 10 mm. All non-target lesions must have disappeared, and tumor markers must have normalized. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, using baseline measurements as a reference. CR or PR iUPD (one or more instances), but not iCPD, before iCR, iPR.
Time frame: Up to 3 years
Time from date of first dose of study treatment to date of first documented PD based on iRECIST, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. PD: At least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking the smallest sum on study (nadir) as the reference. In addition to the 20% relative increase, the sum must also show an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The unequivocal progression of non-target lesions or the appearance of any new lesion also classifies as PD. iUPD (Unconfirmed Progressive Disease) requires a follow-up scan to confirm whether it is true tumor growth or temporary.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Amy Rose, RN, BSN
CONTACT
Danielle Bednarz, RN, BSN
CONTACT
John Kirkwood
Other
A Phase II Trial of MOR Antagonism With Axelopran and Nivolumab in PD-1-Refractory Metastatic Melanoma (MORALE-MM)
Acronym: MORALE-MM
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07576725
Adenocarcinoma, Bronchial Neoplasms
Kampala, Uganda
View Trial DetailsNCT05098210
Anatomic Stage IV Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Bronchial Neoplasms
Seattle, Washington, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06265285
Adenocarcinoma, Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07155317
Advanced Acral Melanoma, Advanced Cutaneous Melanoma
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
View Trial Details