Anti-OX40 Antibody PF-04518600
BiologicalGiven IV
Other names: PF-04518600
NCT Number: NCT03971409
This phase II trial studies how well the combination of avelumab with liposomal doxorubicin with or without binimetinib, or the combination of avelumab with sacituzumab govitecan works in treating patients with triple negative breast cancer that is stage IV or is not able to be removed by surgery (unresectable) and has come back (recurrent). Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors like avelumab require activation of the patient's immune system.
This trial includes a two week induction or lead-in of medications that can stimulate the immune system. It is our hope that this induction will improve the response to immunotherapy with avelumab. One treatment, sacituzumab Govitecan, is a monoclonal antibody called sacituzumab linked to a chemotherapy drug called SN-38. Sacituzumab govitecan is a form of targeted therapy because it attaches to specific molecules (receptors) on the surface of tumor cells, known as Tumor-associated calcium signal transducer 2 (TROP2) receptors, and delivers SN-38 to kill them. Another treatment, liposomal doxorubicin, is a form of the anticancer drug doxorubicin that is contained in very tiny, fat-like particles. It may have fewer side effects and work better than doxorubicin, and may enhance factors associated with immune response. The third medication is called binimetinib, which may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth, and may help activate the immune system. It is not yet known whether giving avelumab in combination with liposomal doxorubicin with or without binimetinib, or the combination of avelumab with sacituzumab govitecan will work better in treating patients with triple negative breast cancer.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 active arms. The three previous study arms are closed to further accrual.
ARM A: Patients receive binimetinib orally (PO) twice daily (BID) for a lead-in period of 15 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients then receive binimetinib PO BID on days 1-28, avelumab intravenously (IV) over 60 minutes on days 1 and 15, and liposomal doxorubicin IV over 60 minutes on day 1. Cycles repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
ARM B: Patients receive sacituzumab govitecan IV on days -15 for a lead-in period in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients then receive sacituzumab govitecan day 8 and day 15 of Cycle (C) 1; day 1, 8, and 21 of C2; day 1, 15 and 21 of C3; day 8 and 15 of C4, and the schedule continues with two weeks on, one week off for 21-day cycles which repeat in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Participants also receive avelumab IV over 60 minutes on days 1 and 15. Cycles repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
ARM C: Patients receive liposomal doxorubicin IV over 60 minutes on day -15 for a lead-in period of 15 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients then receive liposomal doxorubicin IV over 60 minutes on day 15 and avelumab IV over 60 minutes on days 1 and 15. Cycles repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 30 days, then every 6 months for a minimum of 1 year. Participants will be followed every 3 months after experiencing disease progression to assess for survival/anti-cancer therapy status until death or 1 year after Cycle 1 Day 1.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. Anti-tumor effect of avelumab in combination with different therapeutic agents explored in the sub-protocols of the trial.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Additional anti-tumor effects.
II. Safety and tolerability of avelumab in combination with different therapeutic agents explored in the sub-protocols of the trial.
III. Patient reported outcomes (PRO) between baseline and cycle 3 day 1 across arms.
IV. Longitudinal trends in PRO outcomes across treatment arms.
V. Differences in PRO outcomes for patients who respond compared to those who do not respond.
CORRELATIVE OBJECTIVES:
I. To determine the therapeutic predictive role of the following on clinical outcome as well as changes with induction therapy with either liposomal doxorubicin or targeted agents:
II. To determine if circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) (ctDNA) results will discriminate pseudo-progression from true progression.
III. To determine if certain genomic alterations detected in tumor tissue or ctDNA are potentially associated with resistance to the tested drug combinations.
IV. To correlate the composition of the pretreatment microbiome with response and secondary endpoints in each arm of the trial.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 arms.
ARM A: Patients receive binimetinib orally (PO) twice daily (BID) for a lead-in period of 15 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients then receive binimetinib PO BID on days 1-28, avelumab intravenously (IV) over 60 minutes on days 1 and 15, and liposomal doxorubicin IV over 60 minutes on day 1. Cycles repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
ARM B: Patients receive sacituzumab govitecan IV on days -15 and -8 as a lead-in period in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients then receive sacituzumab govitecan IV on days 1 and 8 and avelumab IV over 60 minutes on days 1 and 15. Cycles repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
ARM C: Patients receive liposomal doxorubicin IV over 60 minutes on day -15. Patients then receive liposomal doxorubicin IV over 60 minutes on day 15 and every 4 weeks thereafter. Patients also receive avelumab IV over 60 minutes on days 1 and 15. Cycles repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 30 days, then every 6 months for a minimum of 1 year.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Given IV
Other names: PF-04518600
Given IV
Other names: Bavencio, MSB-0010718C, MSB0010718C
Given PO
Other names: ARRY-162, ARRY-438162, MEK162
Given IV
Other names: PF 05082566, PF 5082566, PF-05082566, PF-2566
Given IV
Other names: Caelyx, Lipodox
Given IV
Other names: Trodelvy, Sacituzumab Govitecan-hziy
Time frame: From treatment initiation until disease progression, an estimated average of 1 year
BORR is defined as the percentage of patients achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 and will be reported for each arm along with 95% two-sided confidence intervals.
Time frame: From treatment initiation until disease progression, an estimated average of 1 year
ORR is defined as the percentage of patients achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) assessed by Immune-Related RECIST (iRECIST) and will be reported by arm with 95% two-sided confidence intervals
Time frame: 6 months
CBR is defined as the percentage of patients achieving complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) using RECIST version 1.1 at 6 months and will be reported by arm with 95% two-sided confidence intervals
Time frame: From treatment initiation until disease progression, an estimated average of 1 year
The median duration of progression-free survival in weeks by arm will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method with censoring used as needed. Median time to event and corresponding confidence intervals will be reported.
Time frame: 12 months
OS is defined as the time from treatment initiation until disease progression or death, whichever comes first and will be reported by arm with 95% two-sided confidence intervals .
Time frame: Up to 30 days after completion of study treatment, approximately 13 months
An unacceptable toxicity is defined as any unexpected and clinically relevant drug-related grade 3 toxicity, or any drug-related grade 4-5 adverse event within the first cycle of therapy assessed via National Cancer Institute CTCAE version 5 criteria. Safety will be evaluated by estimating the percentage of patients who experience a clinically relevant toxicity (both patient and physician reported) for each arm with 95% two-sided confidence intervals.
Time frame: Baseline up to 8 weeks
Will be measured the PROMIS Global Short Form. Change scores will be compared across treatment arms using one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni adjustment for post-hoc multiple comparisons. In the instance that distributional assumptions are not valid, Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA will be used with Dunn's adjustment for multiple comparisons.
Time frame: From baseline until the date disease progression is first observed, an estimated average of 1 year
Will be measured the PROMIS Global Short Form. Change scores will be compared across treatment arms using one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni adjustment for post-hoc multiple comparisons. In the instance that distributional assumptions are not valid, Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA will be used with Dunn's adjustment for multiple comparisons.
Time frame: Baseline up to 8 weeks
Will be measured by the PRO-CTCAE criteria . The data will be presented descriptively using summary statistics and graphical representations across time points. Will assess symptom burden using Likert scores. Each attribute will be presented descriptively using summary statistics and graphical representations across time points.
Time frame: From baseline until the date disease progression is first observed, an estimated average of 1 year
Will be measured by the PRO-CTCAE criteria . The data will be presented descriptively using summary statistics and graphical representations across time points. Will assess symptom burden using Likert scores. Each attribute will be presented descriptively using summary statistics and graphical representations across time points.
Time frame: Baseline up to 8 weeks
The data will be presented descriptively using summary statistics and graphical representations across time points. Change scores will be compared across treatment arms using one way ANOVA with Bonferroni adjustment for post-hoc multiple comparisons. In the instance that distributional assumptions are not valid, Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA will be used with Dunn?s adjustment for multiple comparisons.
Time frame: From baseline until the date disease progression is first observed, an estimated average of 1 year
The data will be presented descriptively using summary statistics and graphical representations across time points. Change scores will be compared across treatment arms using one way ANOVA with Bonferroni adjustment for post-hoc multiple comparisons. In the instance that distributional assumptions are not valid, Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA will be used with Dunn?s adjustment for multiple comparisons.
Time frame: Baseline up to 8 weeks
Will be assessed by TSQM Questionnaire. Change scores will be compared across treatment arms using one way ANOVA with Bonferroni adjustment for post-hoc multiple comparisons. In the instance that distributional assumptions are not valid, Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA will be used with Dunn?s adjustment for multiple comparisons.
Time frame: From baseline until the date disease progression is first observed, an estimated average of 1 year
Will be assessed by TSQM Questionnaire. Change scores will be compared across treatment arms using one way ANOVA with Bonferroni adjustment for post-hoc multiple comparisons. In the instance that distributional assumptions are not valid, Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA will be used with Dunn?s adjustment for multiple comparisons.
Laura Huppert, MD, BA
Other
Innovative Combination Immunotherapy for Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC): A Multicenter, Multi-Arm Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium Study
Acronym: InCITe
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02445391
Breast Diseases, Breast Neoplasms
Mobile, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01750073
Breast Diseases, Breast Neoplasms
Bellevue, Nebraska, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02157051
Breast Diseases, Breast Neoplasms
Seattle, Washington, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02860000
Breast Diseases, Breast Neoplasms
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
View Trial Details