Avatar-mediated Therapy Versus Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Persisting Experiences of Hearing Voices

Clinician-rated scale providing an index of overall severity based on 11 aspects of hallucinations (frequency, duration, intensity of distress, etc.), rated masked to treatment allocation. Each of the 11-items are scored on a 5-point scale (0 - 4), scores range from 0 to 44, with increased symptom expression indicated by higher scores.

Follow-up timepoints on the clinician rated scale that is used to measure the primary outcome. Includes 11-items that are scored on a 5-point scale (0 - 4), scores range from 0 to 44, with increased symptom expression indicated by higher scores.

Subscale of the clinician-rated scale that is used to measure the primary outcome. This includes 1-item that is scored on a 5-point scale (0 - 4), score ranges from 0 to 4, with increased symptom expression indicated by a higher score.

Clinician-rated scale to assess presence and severity of hallucinations. This includes 1-item, scored from 1 to 7, with increased symptom expression indicated by higher scores.

Clinician-rated scale to assess overall psychotic symptom severity on total and sub scale scores (Positive, Negative and General Psychopathology). Includes a total of 30-items that are scored on a 7-point scale (1 - 7). Total score ranges from 30 to 210; Positive and Negative sub scale scores range from 7 to 49; General Psychopathology sub scale scores range from 16 to 112. Higher scores are indicative of increased symptom expression.

Clinician-rated scale to assess depressive symptoms in schizophrenia. Includes a total of 9-items that are scored on a 4-point scale (0 - 3). Total score ranges from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicative of increased symptom expression.

Self-report measure to assess depression, anxiety, and stress. Includes a total of 21-items that are scored on a 4-point scale (0 - 3). Scoring is made up of three sub scales that each include 7 items (Depression, Anxiety, and Stress). The scores for each of the three sub scales range from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating increased symptom expression.

A self-report measure to assess consumer-defined recovery from psychosis. Includes 15-items that are rated on a 5-point scale, scores range (0-4), scores range from 0-60, with greater recovery indicated by higher scores.

The 8-item Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) will be administered at the end of treatment to assess and compare participants satisfaction across the two therapies. In addition, a group of participants will be purposively sampled to be invited to take part in a detailed semi-structured qualitative interview (conducted by a non-blinded researcher) about their experiences of the intervention.

Negative psychological effects such as discomfort and anxiety that are relevant to tolerability will be measured using the Negative Effects Questionnaire (NEQ), a 32-item psychometrically validated questionnaire developed for monitoring adverse effects of psychological therapies. The NEQ items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale (0-4) and differentiates between negative effects attributed to treatment and those caused by other circumstances. Potential deterioration in AVHs will be reported for each group by the proportion of participants showing deterioration above a reliable change index for the PSYRATS. Serious adverse events (SAEs) will include participant death, hospital admissions, episodes of crisis, assessment team treatment, attempted suicide, and violent incidents leading to police involvement; these will be recorded systematically.

Cost-effectiveness calculations will use the Assessment of Quality of Life - 8 Dimensions (AQoL-8D) to measure quality of life as an index of utility, expressed in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). The AQoL-8D includes 35-items covering 8 dimensions: Independent Living, Pain, Senses, Mental Health, Happiness, Coping, Relationships, and Self-worth. To both measure treatment as usual (TAU) and determine broader treatment costs, a Resource Use Questionnaire (RUQ), adapted for use in this population, will be used. Consent for administrative data (e.g., Medicare and Pharmaceutical Benefits, MBS/PBS) will also be collected. Prescribed medication will be considered in terms of both cost and chlorpromazine -equivalent antipsychotic medication dose.

Self-report measure of the degree of impact of hearing voices on domains of distress, interference with day-to-day functioning, and positive impacts. Includes 24-items. Each item is individually scored from 0 (disagree completely) to 10 (agree completely) with higher scores on individual items indicating higher agreement with the items listed experience. Not applicable is also available if the item is not relevant.

Self-report process measure of the degree of negative and positive content of auditory verbal hallucinations. Includes 20-items scored on a 5-point rating scale (0 - 4). Two subscales are created: Positive and Negative sub scales with scores for each ranging from 0 to 40. Higher scores indicate increasing symptom expression of either positive or negative content.

Self-report process measure of the extent to which the person listens to and believes AVH content. Each of the 18-items are scored on a 4-point scale (0-3), with items divided between four subscales: Actively listening to nasty voices, passively listening to nasty voices, believing nasty voices, and disregarding nasty voices. Scores for the first three respective subscales range from 0-12 and scores range from 0-20 for the disregarding nasty voices sub scale. Higher scores are indicative of greater engagement in sub scale listening and believing activities.

Self-report process measure. One-item scored on a scale from 1 - 10, with increasing confidence indicated by higher scores.

Self-report process measures of interpersonal appraisals of AVHs (e.g., as malevolent or powerful). Includes 18-items that are scored on a 4-point scale (0-3), with scores ranging from 0-18 for each of the three sub scales: malevolence (6-items), benevolence (6-items), and omnipotence (6-items). Greater malevolent, benevolent or omnipotent beliefs about voices are indicated by higher scores on each of their respective sub scales.

Self-report process measures of interpersonal appraisals of AVHs (e.g., as malevolent or powerful). Includes 7-items measuring the power differential between the voice and voice hearer on dimensions including, power, strength, confidence, respect, ability to inflict harm, superiority and knowledge that are each scored on a 5-point scale (1-5), with scores ranging from 7 to 35. Higher scores indicate greater perceived power differential in favour of the voice.

Self-report process measure of assertive, aggressive and passive interpersonal responses to AVHs. Includes 15-items that are scored on an 11-point scale (0-10), scores range from 0-150, with items divided between three sub scales: one assertive responding sub scale (5-items) and two non-assertive responding sub scales (passive and aggressive; 5-items each). Higher scores on each sub scale are indicative of greater engagement in sub scale behaviours.

Self-report process measure of self-efficacy to respond in a range of different ways in a relationship, adapted to rate responses to AVH. Includes a total of 32-items that are scored from 0 (not at all confident) to 10 (absolutely confident). Eight sub scales (Agnetic, Agnetic & Uncommunal, Uncommunal, Unagnetic & Uncommunal, Unagnetic, Unagnetic & Communal, Communal, Agnetic & Communal) each of which include 4-items are calculated. The score of each sub scale is the sum of the 4-items (ranging from 0 to 40) divided by 4. Higher scores indicate increasing confidence.

Self-report process measure. Includes 24-items that are scored on a 5-point scale (0 - 4), scores range from 0 to 96, with four sub scales: negative-self, positive-self, negative others, and positive-others. Each sub scale includes 6-items, scores range from 0-24, with stronger belief in schemas indicated by higher scores.