Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06278597

Automatic Evaluation of the Anterior Chamber Angle Width by a New Non-contact Optical Device

The aim of the study is to evaluate an objective, non-invasive optical device able to quantify, without eye contact, the width of the irido-corneal angle and to better identify cases of narrow angle or angle closure that may be prevented with relatively simple treatments.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

IRCCS Fondazione GB Bietti

Roma, Italy, 00184

About this study

Worldwide, glaucoma has been identified as a leading cause of blindness, second only to cataract. The two most common types of glaucoma are primary open-angle and angle closure glaucoma (PACG), both characterized by progressive and irreversible degeneration of the retinal ganglion cells and axons. In PACG, the optic neuropathy occurs as a consequence of raised intraocular pressure (IOP) resulting from physical obstruction of aqueous outflow or degenerative changes in the trabecular meshwork. Angle closure is the result of an anatomic characteristic that causes closure of the drainage angle by synechial or appositional approximation between the iris and the trabecular meshwork, blocking access to aqueous humor. Although the most common mechanism responsible for angle closure is relative pupillary block, this is not the only one. Angle crowding can be caused by plateaus iris, or by multiple mechanisms such as choroidal thickness and uveal expansion.

A careful analysis of the anterior chamber angle is considered the main management strategy for PACG. The Van Herick grading of limbal anterior chamber depth is considered a screening tool for the estimation of angle width although gonioscopy remains the clinical reference standard for assessing the presence of narrow or closed angle. Ultrasound biomicroscopy, Scheimpflug imaging and anterior segment optical coherence tomography are considered as non-invasive alternatives to gonioscopy. However, these techniques are expensive and also have drawbacks. Therefore, there is a need for an easy and objective method able to evaluate the angle width for screening purposes in clinical practice.

Based on these findings, the purpose of the present study is to evaluate an objective, non-invasive optical device able to quantify, without eye contact, the width of the irido-corneal angle and to better identify cases of narrow angle or angle closure that may be prevented with relatively simple treatments.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Willingness to participate and ability to understand and sign an informed consent.
  • 18 years of age or older.
  • Healthy subjects, patients with PACS or angle closure as defined by the EGS Guidelines.
  • The right eye will be included in the study for all patients, unless a clinical contraindication to the examination is present.

Exclusion criteria

  • Inability to understand and sign an informed consent.
  • Any prior ocular surgery or laser treatment with the potential to alter the natural anatomy of the anterior segment of the eye.
  • Corneal or conjunctival abnormalities that preclude an adequate view of the anterior chamber.

Treatment and study plan

NACA Estimator

Diagnostic Test

Grading of peripheral anterior chamber width with the Narrow Anterior Chamber Angle (NACA) Estimator

Primary outcomes

  1. Agreement between the automatic Narrow Anterior Chamber Angle Estimator grading of peripheral anterior chamber width with clinical grading as performed by Van Herick (VH) test at slit lamp

    Time frame: 12 months

    The angle is graded by the NACA estimator as the ratio between the peripheral anterior chamber depth and limbal-corneal thickness, as observed in the slit lamp by the microscope section. A high-resolution camera will synchronously acquire the images to generate the irido-corneal angle grade that will be classified in four grades following the VH classification.

    The standard VH grading scale will be:

    • 1 = space between iris and corneal endothelium of <¼ corneal thickness (angle closure likely),
    • 2 = space between iris and corneal endothelium of ¼ corneal thickness (angle closure possible),
    • 3 = space between iris and corneal endothelium of ½ corneal thickness (angle closure unlikely),
    • 4 = space between iris and corneal endothelium ≥ 1 (corneal thickness angle closure very unlikely).
  2. Agreement between the automatic Narrow Anterior Chamber Angle Estimator grading of peripheral anterior chamber width with clinical grading as performed by gonioscopy.

    Time frame: 12 months

    The angle will be graded for each quadrant at gonioscopy using the modified Shaffer grading system, by which each grade corresponds to the visibility of the different angle structures.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Reproducibility (intra-session) and repeatability (inter-session) of the peripheral anterior chamber width (PACW) evaluation by the Narrow Anterior Chamber Angle Estimator

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Sensitivity and specificity of NACA Estimator grading of PACW in detecting primary angle closure suspects as classified by clinical gonioscopy.

    Time frame: 12 months

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Fondazione G.B. Bietti, IRCCS

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Feb 26, 2024
Registry last updated
Mar 7, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.