Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States
NCT Number: NCT02887703
This study evaluates the effectiveness of a 12-week in home balance training program with and without sensory augmentation for individuals with ataxia. Subjects wear a belt while performing balance exercises three times per week for 12 weeks. The belt measures body motion and has small vibrating elements called tactors mounted inside that when turned on, feel like a cell phone set to vibrate. The tactors provide information about body motion and indicate when and how to make a postural correction. Subjects will receive six weeks of balance training with the tactors turned on and six weeks of balance training with the tactors turned off.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States
Cerebellar ataxias are a group of degenerative neurological disorders, resulting in deficits in speech, limb control, balance, and gait. Individuals with degenerative cerebellar ataxias are at a high-risk of falling and have progressive impairments in motor coordination resulting in unsteadiness in gait and posture. No definitive treatment options are available for ataxia. There is therefore a critical need to identify strategies to improve motor function and reduce falls in patients with ataxia. Physical therapy has been demonstrated to improve motor function in subjects with cerebellar ataxia, but the gains in performance following balance training are modest. Sensory augmentation is a technique of augmenting or replacing compromised sensory information. In the context of sensory-based balance impairments, a sensory augmentation device provides cues of body motion that supplement an individual's remaining intact sensory systems. The investigators hypothesize that sensory augmentation may improve the effectiveness of balance training in individuals with ataxia, and aid in greater improvement in motor function than traditional physical therapy alone. Sensory augmentation has been shown to decrease body sway during real-time operation in a laboratory setting in individuals with vestibular deficits and peripheral neuropathy, and general age-related declines in balance performance. Preliminary results suggest that persistent improvements in balance performance exist over time periods of hours to days following a small number of training sessions. This study aims to characterize the effects of sensory augmentation in individuals with ataxia during static and dynamic balance exercises over a period of twelve weeks of in home balance training with and without vibrotactile sensory augmentation.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Sensory augmentation is a technique of augmenting or replacing compromised sensory information. In the context of sensory-based balance impairments, a sensory augmentation device provides cues of body motion that supplement an individual's remaining intact sensory systems.
Other names: vibrotactile biofeedback, haptic feedback
Time frame: pre balance training (week 1), mid balance training (week 6), post balance training (week 12)
An 8-item scale including walking, standing, sitting, nose-to-finger movements, and fast alternating movements. Standard assessment scale for determining impairment level in individuals with ataxia.
Time frame: pre balance training (week 1), mid balance training (week 6), post balance training (week 12)
Preferred gait velocity will be measured while walking a 10-meter path.
Time frame: pre balance training (week 1), mid balance training (week 6), post balance training (week 12)
Fast gait velocity will be measured while walking a 10-meter path.
Time frame: pre balance training (week 1), mid balance training (week 6), post balance training (week 12)
A stop watch is used to measure how long it takes a participant to stand up and sit down five times in a row without using their hands.
Time frame: pre balance training (week 1), mid balance training (week 6), post balance training (week 12)
A 16-item questionnaire for participants to self report their balance confidence during activities of daily living.
Time frame: pre balance training (week 1), mid balance training (week 6), post balance training (week 12)
A 14-item scale to assess balance including sit-to-stand, standing, turning and picking up items from the floor.
Time frame: pre balance training (week 1), mid balance training (week 6), post balance training (week 12)
An 8-item test to evaluate gait function including normal and fast walking, changing speeds, stepping over obstacles, pivoting, walking with head turns, and stairs.
Kathleen Sienko
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07352085
Ataxia, Brain Diseases
Kaposvár, Somogy County, Hungary
View Trial DetailsNCT05002218
Ataxia, Behavior
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04750850
Ataxia, Brain Diseases
Cardedeu, Barcelona, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT01307176
Ataxia, Behavior
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details