CHU de NICE
Nice, Alpes Maritimes, 06000, France
NCT Number: NCT07326501
"Artificial intelligence (AI), including large language models and conversational tools, is increasingly being used in medical research. These tools may assist researchers at different stages of the scientific process, such as generating research ideas, reviewing the literature, analyzing data, writing manuscripts, and preparing articles for publication. While interest in AI is growing rapidly, there is still limited information on how these tools are actually perceived and used by leading medical researchers. This study aims to better understand the attitudes, perceptions, and self-reported uses of artificial intelligence among corresponding authors who have published in six major international medical journals. These authors play a key role in shaping scientific standards and editorial practices, and their views are essential to understanding how AI may influence the future of medical research. Participants are invited to complete an anonymous online questionnaire that asks about their familiarity with AI tools, how and when they use or plan to use them in the research process, the potential benefits they perceive, and the concerns or limitations they identify. The survey also explores participants' expectations regarding transparency, ethical guidance, and journal policies related to the use of artificial intelligence in scientific work.The study is observational and does not involve any medical intervention or collection of personal or health-related data. Participation is voluntary, and responses are fully anonymous.
Interested in participating?
Request InfoAll sexes
Observational
Nice, Alpes Maritimes, 06000, France
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
This is an observational, non-interventional study based on an anonymous online questionnaire. No intervention is administered to participants.
Time frame: At the inclusion
Participants report their attitudes and perceptions regarding the use of artificial intelligence in the scientific research process through multiple-choice and Likert-scale items. Responses are analyzed descriptively; higher scores indicate more favorable attitudes toward the use of artificial intelligence.
Time frame: At the inclusion
Participants report their attitudes and perceptions regarding the use of artificial intelligence in the scientific research process through multiple-choice and Likert-scale items. Responses are analyzed descriptively; higher scores indicate more favorable attitudes toward the use of artificial intelligence.
Time frame: At the inclusion
Anonymous online questionnaire developed for this study Responses are collected using multiple-choice questions and Likert-scale items. Higher scores reflect greater reported use of artificial intelligence and more positive evaluations of its benefits, while higher concern scores reflect greater perceived risks or limitations
Time frame: At the inclusion
Anonymous online questionnaire developed for this study Responses are collected using multiple-choice questions and Likert-scale items. Higher scores reflect greater reported use of artificial intelligence and more positive evaluations of its benefits, while higher concern scores reflect greater perceived risks or limitations
Time frame: At the inclusion
Anonymous online questionnaire developed for this study Responses are collected using multiple-choice questions and Likert-scale items. Higher scores reflect greater reported use of artificial intelligence and more positive evaluations of its benefits, while higher concern scores reflect greater perceived risks or limitations
Time frame: At the inclusion
Anonymous online questionnaire developed for this study Responses are collected using multiple-choice questions and Likert-scale items. Higher scores reflect greater reported use of artificial intelligence and more positive evaluations of its benefits, while higher concern scores reflect greater perceived risks or limitations
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice
Other
Acronym: AISurvey6 A+
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07551947
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Artificial Intelligence
Třinec, Czechia
View Trial DetailsNCT05810428
Artificial Intelligence, Cranial Nerve Diseases
Milan, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT07341906
Artificial Intelligence, Skin Diseases
Nice, Alpes Maritimes, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06968533
Artificial Intelligence, Asymptomatic Diseases
Taipei, Taiwan
View Trial Details