New York State Psychiatric INstitute
New York, 10032, United States
NCT Number: NCT01888653
Emerging research implicates biased attention to threat in the pathophysiology of anxiety disorders. Recent findings demonstrate significant associations between attention bias and stress vulnerability. This work has motivated the development of a novel therapy, attention-bias-modification (ABM) treatment . ABM is designed to implicitly modify patients' biased threat attendance via computerized training protocols. Emerging evidence indicates that ABM is effective in modifying threat-related attention biases and in ameliorating anxiety symptoms. However, it is unclear whether ABM is efficacious for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The present pilot study is a double blind trial that seeks to examine feasibility, acceptability, safety, efficacy, and risk/benefit ratio of ABM in individuals with PTSD. In addition this pilot study seeks to identify specific genes associated with anxiety disorders and to examine whether these can predict the success of the ABM.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–60 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
New York, 10032, United States
ABM is designed to implicitly modify patients' biased threat attendance via computerized training protocols. Emerging evidence indicates that ABM is effective in modifying threat-related attention biases and in ameliorating anxiety symptoms.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The training protocol consisted of 160 trials per session with 120 angry-neutral and 40 neutral-neutral trials. Each participant was trained with an alternative set of faces to the one used in the assessment task (i.e. if measured with set A then trained with set B and vice-versa). In the ABM condition, training was contin- gent on the bias measured at pre-treatment. Specifically, for those showing a bias toward the threat, the target appeared at the neutral-face location in 100% of the threat-neutral trials, while for those showing a bias away from the threat, the target appeared at the threat-face location in 100% of the threat-neutral trials.
Other names: ABMT
In the ACT condition, threat- face location, probe location, and probe type were fully counter- balanced with no contingency between face valence and probe location, thus resembling the assessment task.
Other names: ABMT Placebo
Time frame: 4 weeks
Measures severity of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms from 0 (least severe) to 80 (most severe).
Time frame: 4 weeks
Measures severity of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms from 0 (least severe) to 80 (most severe).
Research Foundation for Mental Hygiene, Inc.
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07731906
Mental Disorders, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
Salerno, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT06685965
Dyssomnias, Mental Disorders
Zurich, Canton of Zurich, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT07521020
Mental Disorders, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
Ürümqi, Xinjiang, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06646692
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Pomona, California, United States
View Trial Details