Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University
Shiyan, Hubei, 442000, China
NCT Number: NCT07055035
This is a prospective, randomized study to compare the effects of Bachmann bundle pacing (BBP) versus conventional right atrial appendage (RAA) pacing on atrial electromechanical synchrony in patients with sick sinus syndrome (SSS). The study utilizes two-dimensional speckle tracking imaging (2D-STI) to assess improvements in cardiac function and synchrony, aiming to determine a more optimal pacing site for SSS patients.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me30 year–90 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Shiyan, Hubei, 442000, China
Sick sinus syndrome (SSS) is a common indication for permanent pacemaker implantation. Conventional right atrial appendage (RAA) pacing, however, is non-physiological and may lead to atrial conduction delays, atrial remodeling, and an increased risk of atrial fibrillation. Bachmann bundle pacing (BBP) is emerging as a more physiological pacing strategy that may correct atrial conduction delays and improve electromechanical synchronization. This study prospectively enrolled and randomized 72 patients with SSS to receive either BBP or RAA pacing. The primary objective is to evaluate the differences in atrial synchrony, cardiac function, and pacing parameters between the two groups at baseline, 1-month, and 3-month follow-ups, using electrocardiography and two-dimensional speckle tracking imaging (2D-STI). The study aims to provide evidence for BBP as a superior treatment option for improving long-term outcomes in SSS patients.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Implantation of a permanent pacemaker system. The atrial lead (Medtronic 3830 active electrode) is surgically positioned and fixed in the Bachmann bundle region, located at the angle between the superior vena cava and the atrium in the mid-posterior position of the high atrial septum. Successful placement is confirmed by achieving a P-wave width shortening of at least 30ms compared to the preoperative P-wave. The ventricular lead is positioned in the mid-to-lower portion of the ventricular septum. Pacing parameters are measured and confirmed to be good.
Implantation of a permanent pacemaker system using the conventional technique. The atrial active electrode is surgically positioned and fixed in the right atrial appendage. The ventricular lead is placed in the mid-to-lower portion of the ventricular septum. Pacing parameters (sensing > 2.0mV; impedance between 300 to 1000Ω; threshold < 1.5mV) are confirmed to be good.
Time frame: Baseline, 1 Month Post-procedure, 3 Months Post-procedure
Measured by two-dimensional speckle tracking imaging (2D-STI) as the time difference between the onset of the P-wave on the electrocardiogram (ECG) and the peak longitudinal strain of the lateral walls of the right and left atria. A smaller value indicates better inter-atrial synchrony.
Time frame: Baseline, 1 Month Post-procedure, 3 Months Post-procedure
Measured by 2D-STI as the standard deviation of the time-to-peak longitudinal strain of six segments of the left atrium. A smaller value indicates better intra-atrial synchrony.
Time frame: Baseline, 1 Month Post-procedure, 3 Months Post-procedure
Measured by 2D-STI as the time difference between the earliest and latest peak longitudinal strain within the right atrium segments.
Time frame: Baseline, 1 Month Post-procedure, 3 Months Post-procedure
Measured from the 12-lead surface ECG, including P-wave duration (P-AT, P-Am) and P-wave axis (P-aI, P-aL).
Time frame: Baseline, 1 Month Post-procedure, 3 Months Post-procedure
Measured from the 12-lead surface ECG.
Time frame: Baseline, 1 Month Post-procedure, 3 Months Post-procedure
Measured by standard 2D echocardiography.
Time frame: Baseline, 1 Month Post-procedure, 3 Months Post-procedure
Measured by standard 2D echocardiography.
Time frame: Baseline, 1 Month Post-procedure, 3 Months Post-procedure
Includes left atrial reservoir strain (LASr), conduit strain (LAScd), and contraction strain (LASct), measured by 2D-STI.
Time frame: Up to 1 year
Number of patients experiencing newly developed or recurrent atrial fibrillation or atrial tachycardia.
Time frame: 1 Month Post-procedure, 3 Months Post-procedure
Measured via pacemaker programmer interrogation. Unit: millivolts (mV).
Time frame: 1 Month Post-procedure, 3 Months Post-procedure
Measured via pacemaker programmer interrogation. Unit: millivolts (mV).
Time frame: 1 Month Post-procedure, 3 Months Post-procedure
Measured via pacemaker programmer interrogation. Unit: Ohms (Ω).
Time frame: 1 Month Post-procedure, 3 Months Post-procedure
Measured via pacemaker programmer interrogation. Unit: millivolts (mV).
Time frame: 1 Month Post-procedure, 3 Months Post-procedure
Measured via pacemaker programmer interrogation. Unit: millivolts (mV).
Time frame: 1 Month Post-procedure, 3 Months Post-procedure
Measured via pacemaker programmer interrogation. Unit: Ohms (Ω).
Time frame: 1 Month Post-procedure, 3 Months Post-procedure
Measured via pacemaker programmer interrogation. Unit: Percentage (%).
Shiyan City Renmin Hospital
Other Gov
Clinical Study on the Application of Two-dimensional Speckle Tracking Imaging to Evaluate the Atrial Synchrony of Bachmann Bundle Pacing in Patients With Sick Sinus Syndrome
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02154750
Arrhythmia, Sinus, Arrhythmias, Cardiac
La Jolla, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07078487
Arrhythmia, Sinus, Arrhythmias, Cardiac
Tallinn, Harju, Estonia
View Trial DetailsNCT00478933
Arrhythmia, Sinus, Arrhythmias, Cardiac
View Trial DetailsNCT03843242
Arrhythmia, Sinus, Arrhythmias, Cardiac
Daegu, South Korea
View Trial Details