Behavioral therapy
BehavioralPelvic muscle training and exercises
NCT Number: NCT00270998
Stress urinary incontinence is the uncontrollable leakage of urine with physical effort or stress, such as coughing, sneezing, or exercise. Treatment for stress incontinence can be surgical or non-surgical. Different non-surgical treatments include pelvic muscle exercises and pessary use. Pelvic muscle exercises (often known as "Kegel" exercises) train and strengthen the pelvic muscles and improve incontinence. A pessary is a medical device that fits inside the vagina to give the urethra and bladder extra support and prevent or reduce urinary incontinence. Exercises and pessary use can help women with stress incontinence but it is not known which treatment is better, or if a combination of the two treatments at the same time is best. This study will determine whether pelvic muscle training and exercises, pessary use, or a combination of both exercises and pessary is most effective at improving incontinence in women. The study's primary hypothesis is that pessary use is more effective than pelvic muscle exercises after 3 months of treatment.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me21 year and older
Female
Interventional
Phase 3
University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Women commonly have symptoms of stress urinary incontinence (leakage with physical stress such as coughing or sneezing) and urinary urgency or urge incontinence (leakage associated with the overwhelming urge to urinate). Non-surgical treatment is usually offered as first-line therapy, such as pelvic muscle exercises ("Kegel" exercises) or pessary use. A pessary is a small ring that fits inside the vagina. Pelvic muscle training and exercises may help incontinence by increased awareness and strength of the muscles that are used in holding the urethra closed. Pessary use may help incontinence by providing more support to the bladder and urethra. Both treatments can be helpful in reducing or eliminating incontinence, but it is not known which treatment is better. The study will compare the level of improvement with pelvic muscle exercises, pessary use, and a combination of both exercises and pessary.
Women with stress or mixed urinary incontinence will be randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: (1) pelvic muscle training and exercises; (2) pessary use; and (3) both exercises and pessary. Women in the exercises groups will have 4 visits over 8 weeks with a specially trained therapist for pelvic muscle training and exercises. Women in the pessary group will be fitted with a pessary to be worn continuously. Assessments will include questionnaires, bladder diary, and physical examination. Follow-up evaluations occur at 3 months, 6 months (by telephone only), and 1 year after initial treatment.
Comparisons: The level of improvement after treatment will be compared in the 3 groups. In addition, women in the 3 groups will record the number of accidental leakage episodes by bladder diary; and the frequency of those episodes will be compared in the 3 groups. Other aspects of health, including health-related quality of life, will be compared in the 3 groups.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Pelvic muscle training and exercises
Intravaginal pessary
Intravaginal pessary and behavioral therapy
Time frame: Outcome was measured at three months following randomization.
PGI-I, Patient Global Impression of Improvement, is a five-point scale that ranges from "not at all" to "very much better." Participants were considered a success if they responded "much better" or "very much better," or a failure if they responded otherwise.
Time frame: Outcome was measured at three months following randomization.
Success if participants answer either "no" or "yes" with a bother component of "not at all" or "somewhat" to all seven Urogenital Distress Inventory-Stress Incontinence Subscale items of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory, or a failure if they responded otherwise.
Time frame: Outcome was measured at 12 months following randomization.
PGI-I, Patient Global Impression of Improvement, is a five-point scale that ranges from "not at all" to "very much better." Participants were considered a success if they responded "much better" or "very much better," or a failure if they responded otherwise.
Time frame: Outcome was measured at 12 months following randomization.
Success if participants answer either "no" or "yes" with a bother component of "not at all" or "somewhat" to all seven Urogenital Distress Inventory-Stress Incontinence Subscale items of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory, or a failure if they responded otherwise.
Time frame: Outcome was measured at three months following randomization.
Success if participants reported at least 75% reduction in frequency of incontinence episodes on 7-day bladder diary, a failure if they reported otherwise.
Time frame: Outcome was measured at 12 months following randomization.
Success if participants reported at least 75% reduction in frequency of incontinence episodes on 7-day bladder diary, a failure if they reported otherwise.
Time frame: Outcome was measured at three months following randomization.
Success if participant reported being "satisfied" on Patient Satisfaction Question (PSQ), a failure if they reported otherwise.
Time frame: Outcome was measured at 12 months following randomization.
Success if participant reported being "satisfied" on Patient Satisfaction Question (PSQ), a failure if they reported otherwise.
NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network
Network
ATLAS: Ambulatory Treatments for Leakage Associated With Stress, A Randomized Trial of Pelvic Muscle Exercise Versus Incontinence Pessary Versus Both for Women With Stress or Mixed Urinary Incontinence
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03681678
Burning Vagina, Dyspareunia
Royal Oak, Michigan, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06559423
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Ljubljana, Slovenia
View Trial DetailsNCT05341024
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Oslo, Norway
View Trial DetailsNCT05295420
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial Details