Atezolizumab
DrugGiven IV
Other names: MPDL 3280A, MPDL 328OA, MPDL-3280A, MPDL3280A, MPDL328OA, RG 7446, RG-7446, RG7446, RO 5541267, RO-5541267, RO5541267, Tecentriq
NCT Number: NCT03237780
This phase II trial studies the side effects of atezolizumab with or without eribulin mesylate and how well they work in treating patients with urothelial cancer that has come back (recurrent), spread to nearby tissues or lymph nodes (locally advanced), or spread from where it first started (primary site) to other places in the body (metastatic). Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as atezolizumab, may help the body's immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Chemotherapy drugs, such as eribulin mesylate, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Giving atezolizumab and eribulin mesylate may work better at treating urothelial cancer compared to atezolizumab alone.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
University of Alabama at Birmingham Cancer Center, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To confirm that eribulin mesylate (eribulin), at or close to the single agent recommended phase 2 dose, and atezolizumab at the single agent recommended phase 2 dose, can be given together with an acceptable toxicity profile. (Safety/Run-in) II. To estimate the objective response rate (ORR) based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 for eribulin and atezolizumab in combination, and compare that to the ORR of atezolizumab alone. (Phase 2)
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To summarize and characterize the toxicity associated with this 2-drug combination.
II. To estimate the best overall response rate (immune-related best overall response [irBOR] rate) using the immune-related response criteria (irRC).
III. To estimate the disease control rate (DCR: complete response [CR] + partial response [PR] + stable disease [SD]) based on RECIST 1.1.
IV. To estimate the duration of response and the duration of stable disease. V. To summarize the progression-free survival (PFS). VI. To summarize the overall survival (OS). VII. To evaluate efficacy in subsets of patients determined by PD-L1, CD3 and CD8 expression.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:
I. To assess the pharmacodynamic (PD) profile of eribulin when it is given in combination with atezolizumab, specifically exploring the expression of putative tumor, circulating microenvironment and computed tomography (CT) radiomic correlatives of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)/ (mesenchymal-epithelial transition) MET phenotype at baseline and 6 weeks on therapy.
II. To ascertain the role of expression of PD-L1 using the SP142 assay and potentially other methods as a predictive biomarker for response to treatment with atezolizumab in combination with eribulin.
III. To identify clinical biomarkers that may predict for efficacy and toxicity in this population and with this treatment combination.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM I: Patients receive atezolizumab intravenously (IV) over 30-60 minutes on day 1 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also undergo collection of blood and CT with contrast throughout the trial. Patients may undergo biopsy during screening and on study.
ARM II: Patients receive atezolizumab IV over 30-60 minutes on day 1 of each cycle and eribulin mesylate IV over 2-3 minutes on days 1 and 8 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also undergo collection of blood and CT with contrast throughout the trial. Patients may undergo biopsy during screening and on study.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 or 6 months for 52 weeks.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Given IV
Other names: MPDL 3280A, MPDL 328OA, MPDL-3280A, MPDL3280A, MPDL328OA, RG 7446, RG-7446, RG7446, RO 5541267, RO-5541267, RO5541267, Tecentriq
Undergo biopsy
Other names: Biopsy, BIOPSY_TYPE, Bx
Undergo blood sample collection
Other names: Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Sample Collection, Specimen Collection
Undergo CT scan
Other names: Contrast Enhanced Computed Tomography, CONTRAST ENHANCED CT SCAN, Contrast-enhanced Computed Tomography, CT Scan With Contrast, CT with Contrast
Given IV
Other names: B1939 Mesylate, E7389, ER-086526 Mesylate, Halaven, Halichondrin B Analog
Time frame: Up to 52 weeks
Will be graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5. Tables will be created to summarize the numbers of patients who experienced toxicities by arm, toxicity system, type, grade and attribution. If helpful, cumulative incidence curves will be constructed to summarize the onset of selected adverse events.
Time frame: Up to 52 weeks
Will be assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. The two arms will be compared using a one-sided, 0.10-level Mantel-Haenszel, stratifying by (a) cisplatin ineligible first line vs. having received prior platinum therapy, and PD-L1 status in archival tumor tissue (immunohistochemistry [IHC] 0-1 versus [vs] 2-3). Two-sided 80% confidence intervals will be constructed for the probability of response in each arm, as well as the difference between the two arms (unadjusted for the stratification variables). In addition, a logistic regression (exact, if required based on the numbers) will be used to estimate the odds ratio comparing the 2 arms adjusting for the stratification variables, and also by the Bellmunt risk group (1-2 versus [vs] 3-4).
Time frame: Up to 52 weeks
Tables will be created to summarize the numbers of patients who experienced toxicities (graded according to the CTCAE version 5.0), by arm, toxicity system, type, grade and attribution. If helpful, cumulative incidence curves will be constructed to summarize the onset of selected adverse events.
Time frame: Up to 52 weeks
Analysis of the irBOR will be based on a modified intention-to-treat analysis which will include all eligible, randomized patients who receive any amount of either atezolizumab or eribulin. The proportion of patients in each of the 5 categories above will be calculated for each arm and two-sided 80% confidence intervals will be constructed. Two-sided 80% confidence intervals will be constructed for the probability of response in each arm, as well as the difference between the two arms (unadjusted for the stratification variables). In addition, a logistic regression (exact, if required based on the numbers) will be used to estimate the odds ratio comparing the 2 arms adjusting for the stratification variables, and also by the Bellmunt risk group (1-2 vs 3-4).
Time frame: Up to 52 weeks
Will be assessed based on RECIST 1.1. The two arms will be compared in terms of the DCR using a one-sided, 0.10-level Mantel-Haenszel, stratifying by (a) cisplatin ineligible first line vs having received prior platinum therapy, and PD-L1 status in archival tumor tissue (IHC 0-1 vs 2-3). Two-sided 80% confidence intervals will be constructed for the probability of DCR in each arm, as well as the difference between the two arms (unadjusted for the stratification variables). In addition, a logistic regression (exact, if required based on the numbers) will be used to estimate the odds ratio comparing the 2 arms adjusting for the stratification variables, and also by the Bellmunt risk group (1-2 vs 3-4).
Time frame: From randomization until progression or death, whichever occurs first, assessed up to 52 weeks
Will be displayed using Kaplan-Meier plots. Median PFS will be estimated and 80% confidence intervals constructed; PFS at 6 months and 12 months will be estimated and 80% confidence intervals constructed. The two arms will be compared using a one-sided, 0.10-level, stratified logrank test. If numbers permit, Kaplan-Meier plots will be drawn for patients grouped by the stratification variables. In addition, also, if numbers permit, a Cox proportional hazards regression be used to estimate the hazards ratio comparing the 2 arms adjusting for the stratification variables, and also by the Bellmunt risk group (1-2 vs 3-4).
Time frame: From randomization until death or date last known to be alive, assessed up to 52 weeks
OS will be displayed using Kaplan-Meier plots. Median OS will be estimated and 80% confidence intervals constructed; OS at 6 months and 12 months will be estimated and 80% confidence intervals constructed. The two arms will be compared using a one-sided, 0.10-level, stratified logrank test. If numbers permit, Kaplan-Meier plots will be drawn for patients grouped by the stratification variables. In addition, also, if numbers permit, a Cox proportional hazards regression be used to estimate the hazards ratio comparing the 2 arms adjusting for the stratification variables, and also by the Bellmunt risk group (1-2 vs 3-4).
Time frame: From the time measurement criteria are met for CR or PR (whichever is first recorded) until the first date that progressive disease is objectively documented, assessed up to 52 weeks
Will be displayed using Kaplan-Meier plots. Median DOR will be estimated and 80% confidence intervals constructed; DOR at 6 months will be estimated and 80% confidence intervals constructed.
Time frame: Up to 52 weeks
The analyses described for ORR, DCR, irBOR, PFS, and OS will be repeated, examining patients whose tumors are PD-L1 "positive" (IHC = 2-3) and those whose tumors are PD-L1 "negative (IHC = 0-1). Although numbers will be small, the odds ratio's and hazard ratio's will be compared (using the logistic or Cox regression models) to ascertain whether the impact of eribulin is different based on the PD-L1 status.
Time frame: Baseline
Standard descriptive methods will be used to summarize patterns.
Time frame: Baseline up to 6 weeks
Standard descriptive methods will be used to summarize patterns.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Nih
A Randomized, Phase 2 Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Eribulin Mesylate in Combination With Atezolizumab Compared to Atezolizumab Alone in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Transitional Cell Urothelial Cancer Where Cisplatin-Based Treatment is Not an Option
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04953104
Carcinoma, Carcinoma, Transitional Cell
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04963153
Carcinoma, Carcinoma, Transitional Cell
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04940299
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04848519
Carcinoma, Carcinoma, Transitional Cell
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
View Trial Details