Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06806579

Atezolizumab-bevacizumab and Other Immunotherapies: Real-life Experience for Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

- Background Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the third leading cause of cancer-related death. In most cases (about 80%), HCC develops in a cirrhotic liver - a condition where the liver has been damaged over time, leading to scarring. This makes treatment more challenging.

This study will gather and analyze data from patients treated in real-world settings to:

1. Understand the effectiveness and safety of new treatment combinations (e.g., atezolizumab-bevacizumab and durvalumab-tremelimumab).

Identify the best treatment sequences for patients with advanced liver cancer. 2. Discover clinical and laboratory markers that predict treatment responses, helping personalize care and optimize outcomes.

By addressing these questions, this study will provide valuable information to healthcare providers and guide future treatment decisions for patients with liver cancer.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Ospedali Riuniti Ancona, Via Conca, 71, 60126 Torrette AN, Torrette, AN, Italy

Loading trial locations.

About this study

  • Background Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the third leading cause of cancer-related death. In most cases (about 80%), HCC develops in a cirrhotic liver - a condition where the liver has been damaged over time, leading to scarring. This makes treatment more challenging.
  • New Advances in Treatment Options

For many years, sorafenib was the only approved drug for advanced liver cancer when local treatments like surgery were not possible. However, significant advancements have changed the treatment landscape:

  • Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab (Immunotherapy Combination):

In 2019, a groundbreaking study (ImBRAVE-150, Phase 3) demonstrated that combining atezolizumab (an immunotherapy drug) and bevacizumab (an anti-angiogenic drug) significantly improved disease-free survival (time without cancer worsening) and overall survival compared to sorafenib.

This combination was approved in 2019 by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and later by the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) in 2022.

  • Durvalumab and Tremelimumab (Dual Immunotherapy):

In February 2024, another combination-durvalumab and tremelimumab-was introduced following the results of the Phase 3 HIMALAYA trial, which also showed improved outcomes compared to sorafenib.

Several other immunotherapy-based combinations, such as camrelizumab-rivoceranib and nivolumab-ipilimumab, are under evaluation and may become available in the future.

  • Why Is This Study Important?
  • Real-World Effectiveness of Treatments:

While clinical trials have shown promising results for atezolizumab-bevacizumab and durvalumab-tremelimumab, real-world data-information gathered from everyday clinical practice-are still limited. In particular, there is a lack of real-world evidence for the new durvalumab-tremelimumab combination. This study aims to fill that gap by collecting and analyzing data from patients treated in daily clinical practice.

  • Understanding Treatment Sequences:

After completing atezolizumab-bevacizumab or durvalumab-tremelimumab, what is the best next treatment? Currently, the only approved next-line drug is sorafenib, and for third-line treatment in Italy, cabozantinib is the only option. However, there is no clear scientific data on the effectiveness of these treatment sequences.

As more therapies become available, it will be critical to identify the best sequence of treatments to extend survival and improve quality of life.

  • Identifying Predictors of Response:

Some patients respond better to treatment than others. This study seeks to identify clinical and laboratory markers that predict which patients will benefit most from specific therapies.

For example, with sorafenib, the development of certain side effects (like skin reactions) was associated with better survival. It remains unclear whether similar markers exist for newer drug combinations.

Additionally, the study will examine how factors such as treatment intolerance, patterns of disease progression, and second-line therapies influence survival outcomes.

  • What This Study Aims to Achieve

This study will gather and analyze data from patients treated in real-world settings to:

  • Understand the effectiveness and safety of new treatment combinations (e.g., atezolizumab-bevacizumab and durvalumab-tremelimumab).

Identify the best treatment sequences for patients with advanced liver cancer.

  • Discover clinical and laboratory markers that predict treatment responses, helping personalize care and optimize outcomes.

By addressing these questions, this study will provide valuable information to healthcare providers and guide future treatment decisions for patients with liver cancer.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Hepatocellular carcinoma not amenable to locoregional procedures
  • Candidate to frontline systemic treatment with atezolizumab-bevacizumab or other immunotherapies

Exclusion criteria

  • Concurrent treatment with other antineoplastic agents
  • Other active neoplasia

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluate toxicity as first-line therapy

    Time frame: from enrollment up to 3 years from the first dose

    To evaluate toxicity of therapeutic sequences in which atezolizumab-bevacizumab or other immunothrapies were administered as first-line therapy within the standard care pathway for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

    Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0

Secondary outcomes

  1. Progression-free survival

    Time frame: from enrollment up to 3 years from the first dose

    defined as the time between the first administration of atezolizumab-bevacizumab or durvalumab-tremelimumab and radiological progression

  2. Overall survival

    Time frame: from enrollment up to 3 years from the first dose

    defined as the time between the treatment start and the death of the patient, or to the last follow-up evaluation

  3. Objective response rate (ORR)

    Time frame: from enrollment up to 3 years from the first dose

    defined as the percentage of patients who achieve a partial or complete response to the disease on follow-up imaging, according to RECIST 1.1 criteria, out of the total number of patients who undergo at least one radiological assessment.

  4. Rate of Patients Eligible for Second-Line Treatments

    Time frame: from enrollment up to 3 years from the first dose

    defined as the percentage of patients who, after the definitive discontinuation of atezolizumab-bevacizumab or other immunotherapies, have sufficiently good general conditions and liver function to allow the prescription of an additional line of systemic treatment.

  5. Safety monitoring

    Time frame: from enrollment up to 3 years from the first dose

    Incidence of Adverse Events Related to Atezolizumab-Bevacizumab or other immunotherapies

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Francesco Tovoli, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+390512142214

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna

Other

Registry information

Acronym: ARTE

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2030
Study completion
2031
First posted
Feb 4, 2025
Registry last updated
Feb 4, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.