Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00595413

Atacicept in Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha-naïve Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis (AUGUST II)

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of atacicept compared to placebo in the treatment of signs and symptoms in a subject population with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA), inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX) and no previous exposure to anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFalpha) therapy.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Please contact the Merck KGaA Communication Center, Darmstadt, Germany

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female subjects greater than or equal to (>=) 18 years of age at the time of informed consent who have RA satisfying American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria with a disease history of at least 6 months
  • Subjects must have active disease, defined by >=8 swollen joints (out of 66), >=8 tender joints (out of 68) and CRP >=10 milligram per liter (mg/L) and/or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) >=28 millimeter per hour (mm/hr), despite treatment with MTX at a dose of >=15 milligram per week (mg/week) for greater than (>) 3 months
  • Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria could apply

Exclusion criteria

  • Inflammatory joint disease other than RA
  • Previous or concurrent treatment with any approved or investigational biological compound for RA, including but not restricted to any anti-TNFalpha agents, rituximab, abatacept, tocilizumab, interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra) and belimumab
  • Treatment with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARDs) other than MTX
  • Participation in any interventional clinical trial within 1 month before study Day 1
  • MTX dose >25 mg/week, prednisone dose >10 mg/day (or equivalent), or change in steroid or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) dosing regimen within 28 days before study Day 1
  • Immunization with live vaccine or immunoglobulin (Ig) treatment within 28 days before study Day 1 or need for such treatment during the study (including follow-up)
  • Any history or presence of active or latent tuberculosis, major infection requiring hospitalization or intravenous anti-infectives within 28 days before study Day 1
  • Other major concurrent illness or organ dysfunction as specified in the protocol
  • Serum IgG below 6 gram per liter (g/L)
  • Known hypersensitivity to atacicept or to any of the components of the formulated atacicept
  • Other protocol-defined exclusion criteria could apply

Treatment and study plan

Placebo matched to atacicept

Drug

Placebo matched to atacicept will be administered subcutaneously twice a week for initial 4 weeks, followed by once a week for subsequent 21 weeks.

Atacicept: with loading dose

Drug

Atacicept will be administered subcutaneously at a dose of 150 milligram (mg) twice a week for initial 4 weeks as loading dose, followed by 150 mg once a week for subsequent 21 weeks.

Atacicept

Drug

Atacicept will be administered subcutaneously at a dose of 150 mg once a week for 25 weeks.

Adalimumab

Biological

Adalimumab (Humira®) will be administered subcutaneously at a dose of 40 mg every other week for 25 weeks.

Other names: Humira®

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 Response Based on C-reactive Protein (ACR20-CRP) at Week 26

    Time frame: Week 26

    ACR20-CRP response is defined as greater than or equal to (>=) 20 percent (%) improvement from Baseline in both tender joint counts (based on a total of 68 joints) and swollen joint counts (based on a total of 66 joints) together with >=20% improvement from Baseline in at least 3 of the following 5 measures: 1) participant's assessment of pain; 2) participant's global assessment of disease activity; 3) physician's global assessment of disease activity; 4) participant's assessment of physical function; and 5) acute-phase marker (CRP).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 Response Based on CRP (ACR50-CRP) at Week 26

    Time frame: Week 26

    ACR50-CRP response is defined as >=50% improvement from Baseline in both tender joint counts (based on a total of 68 joints) and swollen joint counts (based on a total of 66 joints) together with >=50% improvement from Baseline in at least 3 of the following 5 measures: 1) participant's assessment of pain; 2) participant's global assessment of disease activity; 3) physician's global assessment of disease activity; 4) participant's assessment of physical function; and 5) acute-phase marker (CRP).

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70 Response Based on CRP (ACR70-CRP) at Week 26

    Time frame: Week 26

    ACR70-CRP response is defined as >=70% improvement from Baseline in both tender joint counts (based on a total of 68 joints) and swollen joint counts (based on a total of 66 joints) together with >=70% improvement from Baseline in at least 3 of the following 5 measures: 1) participant's assessment of pain; 2) participant's global assessment of disease activity; 3) physician's global assessment of disease activity; 4) participant's assessment of physical function; and 5) acute-phase marker (CRP).

  3. Percentage of Participants With Good or Moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Responses at Week 26

    Time frame: Week 26

    The EULAR response criteria evaluate change in DAS28 scores represented as "good response", "moderate response", or "no response" considering both the current DAS28 score and the observed improvement from baseline. Participants were considered to have "good" or "moderate" EULAR response if at the time of assessment, their DAS28 score was less than or equal to (<=) 5.1 and the improvement from baseline in their DAS28 score was greater than (>) 0.6; or if at the time of assessment, their DAS28 score was >5.1 and improvement from baseline in their DAS28 score was >1.2.

  4. Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs

    Time frame: From the first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug, assessed up to Week 38

    An adverse event (AE) was defined as any new untoward medical occurrences/worsening of pre-existing medical condition without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

EMD Serono

Industry

Collaborators

  • Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Multi-centre Phase II Study of Atacicept in Anti-TNFα-naïve Patients With Moderate to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate

Acronym: AUGUST II

Important dates

Study start
2007
Primary completion
2009
Study completion
2009
First posted
Jan 16, 2008
Registry last updated
Feb 17, 2016

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.