Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07497230

Asymmetric High-Flow Nasal Cannula During Pulmonary Rehabilitation in COPD

This randomized pilot trial evaluated the feasibility and preliminary effects of using asymmetric high-flow nasal cannula (A-HFNC) during exercise-based pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Thirty patients were randomly assigned to conventional PR or PR supplemented with A-HFNC during aerobic training, completing 12 supervised sessions. The study assessed whether A-HFNC could be safely and acceptably incorporated into PR, and whether it enabled higher training intensity and improved exercise performance. Results showed that the intervention was feasible and safe, with 83% adherence in both groups and no adverse events. Patients in the A-HFNC group trained at significantly higher treadmill inclination and showed a clinically meaningful trend toward greater improvement in maximal exercise tolerance. These findings support the design of a larger definitive trial.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major cause of disability worldwide. Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is the most effective non-pharmacological intervention for COPD, but adherence is limited by exercise intolerance and dyspnea. Strategies that reduce ventilatory demand during exercise may help patients tolerate higher training intensities, potentially improving outcomes.

Asymmetric high-flow nasal cannula (A-HFNC) delivers heated and humidified gas at high flow rates through an asymmetric nasal interface, promoting dead-space washout and reducing the work of breathing. These mechanisms may facilitate higher exercise intensity during PR.

This pilot trial randomized 30 patients with COPD to two groups. The control group received a conventional 12-session supervised PR program including treadmill aerobic exercise, resistance training, and patient education. The experimental group followed the same program with A-HFNC applied during all aerobic training sessions. Flow rate, temperature, and fraction of inspired oxygen were individualized according to oxygen saturation and patient tolerance.

Primary feasibility outcomes were recruitment rate, protocol adherence, and absence of serious adverse events. Exploratory clinical outcomes included six-minute walk distance, incremental load test performance (modified Bruce protocol), and COPD Assessment Test score, assessed at baseline and after the 12-session program. Secondary outcomes included heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, rate-pressure product, and perceived dyspnea.

The study was conducted at the cardiopulmonary rehabilitation center of Hospital Clínico San José, Santiago, Chile, between May and September 2025. Ethics approval was obtained from the institutional review board (No. 276/2025). The trial was registered retrospectively upon manuscript preparation.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 40 years or older
  • Spirometry-confirmed COPD diagnosis (post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio less than 0.70)
  • Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea grade 2 or higher
  • Spirometry performed within the preceding 12 months

Exclusion criteria

  • Acute respiratory exacerbation within the preceding three months
  • Uncontrolled respiratory symptoms or any acute condition compromising clinical stability
  • Current use of home non-invasive mechanical ventilation or artificial airway
  • Hospitalization within the preceding three months
  • Neuromuscular or osteoarticular conditions limiting physical activity
  • Cognitive or communication difficulties precluding adherence to instructions
  • Recent acute cardiovascular events
  • Decompensated comorbidities

Treatment and study plan

Asymmetric High-Flow Nasal Cannula (A-HFNC)

Device

Experimental:

Asymmetric high-flow nasal cannula (A-HFNC) applied during aerobic training sessions of a 12-session supervised pulmonary rehabilitation program. Flow rate was set at 50 L/min, temperature at 31-34°C, and FiO₂ at 21-36%, individualized according to oxygen saturation and patient tolerance. Aerobic exercise was performed on a treadmill with progressive intensity adjustment based on cardiorespiratory response.

Control:

Conventional 12-session supervised pulmonary rehabilitation program including treadmill aerobic exercise, upper and lower limb resistance training, and patient education. Aerobic workload was determined from baseline incremental load test and progressively adjusted based on cardiorespiratory response. No supplemental device was used during training.

Conventional Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program

Other

Twelve supervised pulmonary rehabilitation sessions including treadmill-based aerobic exercise, upper and lower limb resistance training, and patient education. Aerobic workload was determined from baseline incremental load test results and progressively adjusted according to each participant's cardiorespiratory response. Heart rate, oxygen saturation, and perceived dyspnea were continuously monitored during all sessions. No supplemental device was used during training.

Primary outcomes

  1. Incremental Load Test Duration

    Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention (week 6)

    Total exercise duration in seconds achieved during an incremental load test using the modified Bruce protocol on a treadmill. Reflects maximal cardiorespiratory exercise capacity.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Universidad de Santiago de Chile

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Feasibility and Preliminary Effects of Asymmetric High-flow Nasal Cannula During Exercise-based Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients With COPD: a Randomized Pilot Trial

Acronym: A-HFNC-PR

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Mar 27, 2026
Registry last updated
Apr 1, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.