Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03864354

Asthma and Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment

The effect of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment (OMT) has been studied in adult patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and children with asthma, however, to the authors' knowledge, no current studies have evaluated the non-immediate effects of OMT on pulmonary function in adults with chronic asthma using spirometry. The objective of the current study was to quantify the immediate, intermediate, and long-term effects of OMT on adult patients with a history of asthma. The quantitative effects were measured with a spirometry device and include the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), the forced vital capacity (FVC), the FEV1/FVC ratio, and the peak expiratory flow (PEF). These four values are used clinically in the diagnosis and management of asthma. The long-term, subjective effects were measured via the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire with Standardized Activities (AQLQ(S)).

The study was conducted over a period of eight weeks. During week 0, participants completed the initial AQLQ and performed baseline spirometry testing. During weeks 1, 2, and 3 of the study, a standard OMT protocol was performed on each participant, followed by spirometry testing to measure the immediate effect. Spirometry testing was then performed again three days after each treatment to measure the intermediate effect of OMT. During week 7, participants completed the post-OMT AQLQ(S) and performed spirometry testing once more to measure the long-term effects of OMT. The OMT protocol performed on each patient included treatments to address somatic dysfunctions of the head, cervical spine, thoracic spine, ribs, and respiratory diaphragm. The authors hypothesized that OMT would improve pulmonary function, both subjectively and objectively. The authors predicted an increased overall mean AQLQ(S) score as well as an increased mean score within each domain, including symptoms, activity limitations, emotional function, and environmental stimuli. The authors also predicted a significant increase in the mean FEV1/FVC ratio, and PEF three days after each OMT session and a significant increase four weeks after the final OMT session, but no increase immediately after OMT.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Des Moines University

Des Moines, Iowa, 50312, United States

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years of age or older
  • previously diagnosed with asthma

Exclusion criteria

  • Current smoker
  • Diagnosed with any other respiratory disease besides asthma
  • Receiving OMM from a licensed physician, chiropractic treatment, or massage therapy for 30 days prior to and during the study

Treatment and study plan

Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment

Procedure

Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment (OMT) is a cost-effective, noninvasive treatment that is used to optimize the body's structure and function. By improving the biomechanical, autonomic, and circulatory mechanisms involved in the disease process of asthma, OMT can help maximize respiratory function. The specific OMT protocol used in this study included the following: supine OA joint myofascial release (MFR), supine cervical spine Still technique, supine thoracic inlet MFR, supine rib raising soft tissue, supine rib MFR, supine abdominal diaphragm MFR, seated thoracic spine Still technique, and seated posterior rib Still technique. Treatments were performed by Predoctoral Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine (OMM) Fellows at Des Moines University (DMU) and supervised and checked by one of two board-certified OMM/NMM physicians from the OMM Department at DMU. The treatment lasted an average of 21 minutes and repeated three times, spaced one week apart.

Primary outcomes

  1. Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) measured in liters by a spirometer

    Time frame: Measured during weeks 0 (at baseline), 1, 2, 3, and 7 of the study to assess the change over time. During weeks 1, 2, and 3, spirometry was performed immediately after the OMT protocol was completed as well as three days later.

  2. Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire with Standardized Activities (AQLQ(S))

    Time frame: Participants completed the survey at baseline and four weeks after the last treatment to compare the change.

    The AQLQ asks about a participant's past 2 weeks as they relate to their symptoms, activity limitations, emotional function, and environmental stimuli. Each item is a 7-point Likert scale, with 1 being severely impaired and 7 not impaired at all.

  3. Forced vital capacity (FVC) measured in liters by a spirometer

    Time frame: Measured during weeks 0 (at baseline), 1, 2, 3, and 7 of the study to assess the change over time. During weeks 1, 2, and 3, spirometry was performed immediately after the OMT protocol was completed as well as three days later.

  4. Forced expiratory flow in one second to forced vital capacity ratio (FEV1/FVC ratio) by a spirometer

    Time frame: Measured during weeks 0 (at baseline), 1, 2, 3, and 7 of the study to assess the change over time. During weeks 1, 2, and 3, spirometry was performed immediately after the OMT protocol was completed as well as three days later.

  5. Peak expiratory flow (PEF) measured in liters per minute by a spirometer

    Time frame: Measured during weeks 0 (at baseline), 1, 2, 3, and 7 of the study to assess the change over time. During weeks 1, 2, and 3, spirometry was performed immediately after the OMT protocol was completed as well as three days later.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Des Moines University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

The Immediate, Intermediate, and Long-Term Effects of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment on Pulmonary Function in Adults With Asthma

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Mar 6, 2019
Registry last updated
Mar 6, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.