ASSIP, Attempted Suicide Short Intervention Program. Two Year Follow-Up Study

Background

In the prevention and treatment of suicidality the main emphasis according to the traditional medical model has been on diagnosis and treatment of mental disorders, first and foremost depression. However, it is debatable how far this approach toward the suicidal patient can actually affect suicide rates. It has been argued that the mechanisms of suicidal behavior should be studied independently of any associated psychiatric disorder.

Follow-up studies strongly suggest that when a person has attempted suicide, the risk of future suicidal behavior, including death by suicide, cannot be "cured". Once a person has tried to solve an emotional crisis with a suicide attempt, this behavioral pattern will quickly re-emerge in similar situations in the future, not only because a suicide attempt provides a - temporary - solution, but also because very often it associated with an immediate sense of relief. The prevailing view emerging from recent developments in suicide research is that, following attempted suicide, it is crucial to establish individual safety strategies with patients for coping differently in future emotional crises. For as many patients as possible to benefit, treatments targeting suicidality should be brief and focused, and, of course, effective.

ASSIP combines aspects of action theory, cognitive behavior therapy, and attachment theory. A fundamental assumption is that an action theoretical approach toward the suicidal patient will establish a therapeutic alliance in the sense of a "secure base", which will enhance the effect of the regular letters following the four treatment sessions. ASSIP is not a stand-alone therapy but should be offered to suicidal patients in addition to the usual clinical management and follow-up treatment.

Objective

• How effective is ASSIP, compared to a control group in preventing suicidal behaviour after a suicide attempt?

• Primary outcome measures: Suicidal behaviour, suicidal ideation
• Secondary outcome measures: Depression, coping skills, contact to health care system
• Which parameters have a moderating influence on outcome measures?

• Therapeutic alliance
• Diagnosis
• Previous suicide attempts

Methods

In this treatment study, 120 patients were randomly assigned to either the ASSIP intervention or a control group that received a one-session clinical assessment. Both groups received in- and outpatient treatment as usual. The quality of the therapeutic alliance as a moderating factor for outcome was measured at the therapy sessions 1 (both groups) and 3 (ASSIP group only) using the Helping Alliance Questionnaire (HAq). Regarding outcome measures the study participants completed a set of psychosocial and clinical questionnaires every 6 months during a 24-months follow-up period.

Inclusion criteria

• Male/female
• Inpatient/outpatient, day care treatment
• German language
• All diagnosis (except: psychosis)
• Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

• Psychosis
• Imprisonment
• Foreign languages